Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2008 - 05:17pm PT
|
I don't believe homosexuals care all that much about accceptance, but they are definitely about equal rights for all.
|
|
Grant Meisenholder
Trad climber
CA
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2008 - 05:29pm PT
|
"Heterosexuals are not trying to get homosexuals to allow them acceptance and legal marriage."
Uh, hello? (sound of knuckles rapping on granite bust being carried on a pair of shoulders somewhere in southern idunno)
Please try and cogitate before submitting commentary to this thread.
Thanks
|
|
Jaybro
Social climber
wuz real!
|
|
Lois and DMT arguing with themself, Pagan and Blue, going Deliverence™ in the bed of a pick em up truck; More laws, Already! Hurry!
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Homo sex is definately not natural.
Take it up your azz and tell me again it's so natural.
Oooooh aaaahhhh like WTF man!
Two guys getting married? Most definitely weird.
|
|
Doug Buchanan
Mountain climber
Fairbanks Alaska
|
|
All things are natural, by design, even the idiots who claim knowledge beyond their current understanding to be unnatural, much to the howling laugher of the observers.
DougBuchanan.com
|
|
Grant Meisenholder
Trad climber
CA
|
|
If you're going to try and support an argument with a point like that, you'd better stay out of politics, Cleitus.
|
|
L
climber
Soy latte center of the Known Universe
|
|
Gay Couples I Have Known:
Mom, Dad...you might want to sit down. We've got something to tell you...
You sexy floppy-eared thing you! Whatta ya say we head up to my bedroom, I put on the theme from Catz, show you my autographed photo of Morris...and we let Nature take Its course?
They laughed at us. Said it would never work. And now look, 52 dog-years later...just a couple of old flamers still mad for each other...
NO! NO! A thousand times NO! It will NEVER work! You're a vegetarian for godsake!
Felix! Stop it--you sex-crazed kitten you! They're looking at us!
Yes I wuv my wittle bunny munchiken! I wuv you, wuv you, wuv you!
Stephie...I think I'll get a pedicure and highlight today. Would you like me to make an appointment for you to get your tail fluffed?
Grrrrrr...grrrrr.....you want the Big Carrot, my little love-bunny? You got to come and get it!
Pssssst...Alfred, Darling--would you just look at those shoes Maurice is wearing!
Beauford! Beauford! Wake up! It's time for Oprah!
Whadda ya mean they're mine??? We're GAY!
|
|
Grant Meisenholder
Trad climber
CA
|
|
"t must be considered a lifelong incurable affliction, JUST LIKE PEDOFILLIA"
?!! The embellishing of feet with gold and silver paints?!!! Wow, we're really off-topic now...
RJ- I'll leave you to your rants with this one last point- You've never put forth a single argument that answers the question of what precedent in either the Constitution or the Bill of Rights you think applies to this "aberrant behavior" - which is present in both straight and gay populations (and in terms of percentage of human population is far, far greater in heterosexuals) - that it should be legislated against only for gays.
Just because it goes against your personal morality doesn't make it a defensible legal argument.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Heterosexual SC/SD has coexisted forever - in fact, they often coexist with homosexual SC/SC, often all four in the same Republican and Evangelical bodies.
Your arguments relative to the whole SC/SD thing is patently ridiculous and rooted in so much bias you don't even realize it. There is no uniquely gay behavior relative to your examples, just different degrees of publicity and percentages of practice within heterosexual/homosexual worlds. You have zero argument based on merit - it's all based on what you happen to find repugnant. Hey, I find most SC and fundamentalist behavior both repugnant and dangerous to our nation and constitution, but it's covered so despite how f*#ked up it is I tolerate it. You should learn to do the same.
Marriage is a 'right' of individuals and should be available to any and all individuals - no dicking around with the language, just a straightforward "proposition that all men are created equal." It's easy to tell that backing up in time you'd also have been able to write a similar tract on why women should never be allowed to vote.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!