Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
raymond phule
climber
|
|
If the graphic that shows the drawn-in 757 is correct, then Houston, we have a problem.
Why? The damage on the building seems to correspond well to the shape of the airplane. A lot of damage where the fuselage and engines hit and only a little damage where the wing tips hit the walls.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
We can also ignore testimony from eye witnesses.
I guess that you mean the eyewitnesses that saw an airplane flying into pentagon?
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
"...only a little damage where the wing tips hit the walls. "
You mean 'zero' damage where the wing tips should have hit the walls. Look again, there is no sign of any impact where the wing tips should have hit.
As for eye witnesses, there were many who saw different things. But the ones who claim seeing other than an 575 are ignored. Also ignored are those from the other two sites (WTC & Flight 93 crash site).
Cheers, out.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
But the ones who claim seeing other than an 575 are ignored.
Obviously ignored by everyone because I do not think that there are information about any .
You mean 'zero' damage where the wing tips should have hit the walls. Look again, there is no sign of any impact where the wing tips should have hit.
I don't know what you see but I see damage.
Do you also think that the collapse of wtc 1 and wtc 2 looks exactly like controlled demolition?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
You may argue that the wing tips were just flimsy aluminum shells but those big ol wads of titanium known as jet engines, where are they and where is there damage?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
^^^ Well that blew my mind ^^^
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
You may argue that the wing tips were just flimsy aluminum shells but those big ol wads of titanium known as jet engines, where are they and where is there damage?
Sorry but I don't know what to say. There are big holes and a lot of damage where the jet engines would have hit the building in the picture I look at.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
But where are the tons of titanium?
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
I have found that people in the 'minority within the minority' have really not taken the time they should to consider everything.
Agree, they should watch the "box video" if they are not already convinced. All needed to understand that the towers couldn't fell like that is a simple application of conservation of momentum.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
But where are the tons of titanium?
Inside the building? Maybe under the foam? In the pile of debris?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Inside the building? Maybe under the foam? In the pile of debris?
Nope, never found. Check out the melting temperature of titanium as compared ton the burn temps jet fuel.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Sorry but i have to laugh uproariously. If you think that teeny part came off a 757 jet engine then you are seriously fooled.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Nope, never found. Check out the melting temperature of titanium as compared ton the burn temps jet fuel.
I discussed a picture and you made an obviously incorrect claim about that picture and instead of acknowledging that you start talking about something else.
This is so typical about these discussions. There are a million different conspiracy claims that very often contradicts each other. When one of their claims is disproved they just continue to the next claims and ignoring the first claim. After a while they get back to the old claims again and the circle continues.
What about trying to come up with a single coherent theory that is in agreement with the evidence? There are for example several witnesses that saw a low flying plane heading towards pentagon. There are no witnesses (that I know about) that saw a missile heading towards pentagon.
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
Read the link Philo. Most of the diameter of an engine is the fins and the cowling. The parts shown are the core of the engine, without fins.
Funny how the universally agreed parts of an engine confuse the conspiracy boyz.
You guys thinking that the conspirators would plant parts of a tiny engine to fool the investigators is beyond me.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
And yet curiously the inner core of a 757 engine dwarfs that part you presented as fact. Do you know what engine it matches perfectly? Not a twin engine 757.
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
I haven't seen any proof that hamsters didn't do it.
Caught redhanded leaving the scene.
Why was this left out of the report?
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
If there is nothing to hide then why continue to keep the Pentagon surveillance videos hidden?
Werner, because they are trying to hide that it was done by hamsters.
Unless, they are hiding the alternative explanation?
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
You have to wonder why Bush and Cheney INSISTED that they testify together for the commission, behind closed doors, not recorded, and not under oath
asshats of the first degree
peace
Karl
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!