palin thinks the world is coming to an end

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 21 - 40 of total 80 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
WBraun

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:16pm PT
So Lois? Next question .....

Who knows how to run the world perfectly?

If you say no one can then your post above is tainted with hypocrisy.
dirtbag

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:22pm PT
"It is because they are very into running everyone's life. They, and the government they would create, knows what is best for you - and everyone else, for that matter. It bugs the sh#t out of them that they cannot control what you do and how you think. "


So that's why you're supporting an anti-choice book-banner?

Because those are ways she is trying to stay out of our lives?



Flashlight

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:25pm PT
The unborn children don't have a choice.

Call it what it is dirtbag, it is "pro-abortion", not "pro-choice".
dirtbag

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:28pm PT
No. That's wrong.

Pro-choice means we believe women should have freedom over their bodies. It means pro-reproductive freedom. It doesn't mean we think women should have abortions or that abortions are good for everyone: that would be pro-abortion.
WBraun

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:36pm PT
Pro-reproductive freedom

What's that mean?
Jaybro

Social climber
wuz real!
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:38pm PT
Lois, change the religous part and you just described the last 8yrs of the Bushdom to a T! Thank you
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Sep 8, 2008 - 01:55pm PT
Tomcat,
Most Americans are Christians and clearly have no impediment to worshipping freely. The Palin/Obama distinction you're pointing at just doesn't exist. Rather, you're missing the issue.

Palin's form of Christianity seeks to impose her views on her faith on others and made them public policy and/or law. Obama does not. HUGE distinction. Unfortunately, most on the religious right simply refuse to see the issue.

IMHO, and spoken as a life long practicing Catholic, there's very little christian about Palin and her policies. She may want to return the country to the dark ages when (ahem) the Catholic Church controlled Europe and influenced and controlled the law, but we've all moved past that point a long time ago. She needs to fast forward about 500 to 600 years and get with the program. You should too.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, Ca
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:10pm PT
Is there anyone out there who would propose that the world is not coming to an end? Either there is some huge asteroid or comet out there with our name on it, or some intergalactic Attilla The Hun is having his chef come up with the best recipe for serving man before he blows the earth to smithereeens, or eventually our own sun will consume us. A predictable event...

Of course I am not advocating that we all will need to be "ministered to" at such a time. It will simply suck.

Maybe when they hit the button on that black hole experiment in Europe there...
WBraun

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:15pm PT
"Werner, nobody knows it all or has the right answers to everything."

That's not true. That means more hypocrisy.

That means you are saying that you know everything and there is no such person that exists in the the entire cosmic creation that knows everything but you do.
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
up Yonder (the edge of Treason)
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:15pm PT
Actually Palin is correct...The world is coming to an end.




In about 4.5 billion years or so.
Flashlight

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:16pm PT
LEB, my semi-official stance is this: Abortion should be illegal, but unenforced. In other words, the government should not sanction abortion by making it legal. We must then work on peoples hearts to stop abortion, you won't stop abortion by making it illegal, IMHO.
dirtbag

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:19pm PT
"as you Dems just love to do"

Sarah Palin is a book banner. She is a Republican too.

Tell me how that is not an attempt to exercise control.

You once said you didn't see Bush's disastrous policies and incompetence coming when you voted for him 8 years ago. I can see why.
dirtbag

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:21pm PT
"Pro-reproductive freedom

What's that mean? "

The freedom to make choices concerning your body and whether or not you'd like to reproduce.
John Moosie

climber
Beautiful California
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:30pm PT
By stating unequivocally that no one has complete knowledge, you are implying that you have complete knowledge on this subject. Otherwise, if you do not have complete knowledge, then you can not know for certain that no one else does.

It would be more correct to say that to you, it appears that no one has complete knowledge.

Lois, you should perhaps look closer at what Jaybro is saying. You are complaining that dems want to control you. Yet so do republicans. Unless of course republicans plan on paying for this war out of their own pockets.

Even the notion of closing public schools is an effort to control those who want public schools or even see the need for them.

What you call freedom is only your version of freedom. Perhaps you are not as free as you think you are.
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:38pm PT
"Bush was a failure. The ideology was not necessarily a failure. If you blow a case as an attorney or I screw up a patient as a nurse, is the underlying profession at fault or are we (you and I as individual practitioners) f*#k-ups?"

This is a really poor analogy. You're making the underlying assumption that the underlying policies are sound, and there's clearly alot of debate over that point.

I, for one, find the policies very unsound, which is why I vote democrat. I just believe that the policies espoused the by Republican party are fundamentally wrong: tax breaks don't trickle down; you don't protect consumers and tax payers by protecting business; lack of environmental regulations, while good for business bottom lines in the short run, ultimately hurt consumers and taxpayers, particularly when they fit the bill for cleanup, etc., etc, etc.

I could a few more etcs. but I think you get my point.
WBraun

climber
Sep 8, 2008 - 02:48pm PT
Yes, thanks for clarifying that Moosie.

"Pro-reproductive freedom"

The freedom to make choices concerning your body and whether or not you'd like to reproduce.

That means you are giving the woman the free license to kick anyone out as she so wishes from her womb.

The soul is sent to the womb of the prospective mother thru the male sperm. Contraceptives create an uncomfortable environment for that soul and thus will be forced to leave.

The karmic reaction for that is being enforced dilengently unbeknownst.

Even from a mundane materialistic view we can see that there are laws in this country from kicking people out of their apartments indiscriminately.

Mighty Hiker

Social climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Sep 8, 2008 - 03:09pm PT
Palin's youngest son is named Trig Paxson Van Palin (rhymes with "Van Halen"). At the time he was born, the Alaska news media reported that he was named for his grandfather, presumably his paternal grandfather. KTUU television reported "Trig is named after his great uncle, a Bristol Bay fisherman". (http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=8194634);

However, the story of the name seems to be evolving. More recently, Trig has been reported as being named for a Norse word meaning strength. This isn't quite true. There is no word in Norwegian spelt "trig". There is a word "trygg", meaning secure, safe or confident. Perhaps "Trig" is an unusual spelling of "trygg", for Americans unused to other tongues. Or perhaps it is as much based on the word "trigger", which seems more consistent with Ms. Palin's background.

The name Tryggve is found in Norway, and has trygg as its root. (Perhaps Tryggve was in fact the grandfather's name.) Olav Tryggvason was king of Norway from 995 - 1000 CE, but a much better known person with that name was Tryggve Lie, the first Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Tomcat

Trad climber
Chatham N.H.
Sep 8, 2008 - 03:27pm PT
For the record,I'm pro-choice.I'm also not the least bit worried women's reproductive rights are about to be overturned.

Fat Dad,your post appears to say Palin is not a Christian but is trying to impose her Christian views on everyone.Which is it?

How many books has she banned?



Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Sep 8, 2008 - 03:42pm PT
"How many books has she banned?"

That's become the standard answer for the right's defense. She didn't actually succeed in banning the books, therefore no harm, no foul. Sorry but pretty lame.

The issue is she wanted to and made efforts through her authority as mayor to ban books. The fact she actually [edit: did not] succeed is immaterial. As a nation, we hold freedom of expression and freedom of thoughts as guiding principles. That any public official would attempt to infringe on those rights says that they're unqualified for office because they believe their opinion is more valid than the Constitution. That's kind of a flaw, wouldn't you say. Somehow I think all those brave men and women who have fought and died for this country did not do so so that a dimwit mayor from a podunk town could decide what books we could or could not read. That's not America. That's the Soviet Union or something out of an Orwell novel.

Also, please reread my post. Very clearly, I didn't say she wasn't a Christian. I said her acts are unchristian. Obviously (though not to you) there's a difference.
happiegrrrl

Trad climber
New York, NY
Sep 8, 2008 - 03:51pm PT
I just can't keep reading these "Palin this, Palin that" posts. They make my head spin.

SHE AIN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!

But this talk about abortion; that is something that concernes me.

Lois wrote:
" If abortion once again becomes illegal then instead of babies dying, mothers AND babies will die from back room abortions - abortions will continue. The only difference will be where they occur and who performs them "

While it is true that women will be dying from illegal abortions, who performs abortions would hardly be "the only difference" should Roe vs. Wade be overturned.

The repercussions of such an overturn are so vast as to be nearly uncomprehendable. Times have changed in the last several decades and the safety net that a pregnant teenager or young lady could fall into has long evaporated.

The only possible positive change I can think of having occurred is that it is more difficult for men whose sperm are half the equation in a pregnancy to skip out when it comes time for accountability.

Mark my words - if Roe vs. Wade is overturned, those laws will also change. Heaven f*#king forbid a guy's life is "ruined" by having to pay for some tramp's kid for twenty years, right?
Messages 21 - 40 of total 80 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta