Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 05:39pm PT
|
This [ http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-09-07/ ] is a great link. I'll take the time to go through it.
Now, when are we gonna get Werner to fly that plane into the Pentagon to see what would actually happen in such a case??
|
|
Big Mike
Trad climber
BC
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 05:44pm PT
|
+1000 Mchale's. I was just going to say, this guy has almost 1800 engineer/architects duped so far! He must be pretty darn convincing!! That article you posted cites the official report lots so its pretty obvious where the bias is on that one... Why didn't they do a real investigation instead of hauling all the evidence away before anyone got the chance??
|
|
McHale's Navy
Trad climber
Panorama City, California & living in Seattle
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:05pm PT
|
Dude, I don't think you are much of a Dr of anything. Want to fess up?
|
|
McHale's Navy
Trad climber
Panorama City, California & living in Seattle
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:08pm PT
|
You mean you just wanna have fun? One does not have to be a demolition expert to understand the forces that would have kept the toppling bldg section intact longer than it was.
|
|
Rudder
Trad climber
Costa Mesa, CA
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:33pm PT
|
Rudder, steel doesn't burn. Not without an agent to make it do so.
That's not what I said.
With your abundant construction knowledge, what made the steel in the WTC buildings "burn?"
Even if melted metal at the WTC didn't have an explanation... assuming the President had the buildings blown up because you've seen videos of melted metal would be as logical as assuming I have abundant construction knowledge. It's just entertaining and extraordinarily whimsical conjecture.
As for the President imploding the buildings as a logical conclusion based on some melted metal videos... have you ever been to or setup a building implosion? There's no melted metal there. Of course, all the utilties are turned off, all the combustibles are removed from the building, and there is no jet fuel.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:35pm PT
|
FWIW there is a large organization of engineers and Architects that dispute the official story on 9-11 based on their scientific analysis
http://ae911truth.org/
over 1700 engineers and Architects (plus bunches of other supporters) are calling for a new investigation of 9-11. Their petition includes their license numbers or degrees
|
|
Toker Villain
Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:53pm PT
|
What impresses the hell out of me is how those devious conspirators were able to figure out exactly where those planes were going to hit the buildings so that they could pre-place the charges in a way so that the charges would resist the fire for the better part of an hour before detonating and collapsing the buildings.
Absolutely brilliant!
Those conspirators must have been evil geniuses (or is that genii ?)!
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:55pm PT
|
^^^^^^^^^^ Now THAT was BRILLIANT! HaHaHaHaHaHa!
|
|
Big Mike
Trad climber
BC
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:56pm PT
|
Agreed Dr F.
|
|
Rudder
Trad climber
Costa Mesa, CA
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 06:59pm PT
|
Is that we need a New 911 Investigation.
More money we don't have to prove more convincingly the same conclusion. Do we really need to do that?
|
|
GDavis
Social climber
SOL CAL
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 07:02pm PT
|
keeping an eye on this thread.
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 07:44pm PT
|
Absolutely shocking that the upper section would tilt towards max damage side. We need a new investigation!
BTW, Chief, Thanks for creating yet another dumbass 911 thread.
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 07:51pm PT
|
That 'explosion' would be supersonic, not the slow speed ejection we see.
And we'd here it thru out manhatten.
Once the backside hinge is broken, there's nothing that would keep it from coming straight down.
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 08:12pm PT
|
Steel can burn. Certain cutting processes rely on steel burning.
Just didn't happen on 911
|
|
bluering
Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 08:24pm PT
|
FWIW there is a large organization of engineers and Architects that dispute the official story on 9-11 based on their scientific analysis
http://ae911truth.org/
over 1700 engineers and Architects (plus bunches of other supporters) are calling for a new investigation of 9-11. Their petition includes their license numbers or degrees
Are these the same as the Global Warming scientists?
And people say my theories are crazy...It was f*#king planes!!!!
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Nov 29, 2012 - 08:25pm PT
|
Granite, that's pretty cool [steel wool burning]!
But what's the point?
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|