OWS is bringing war with Iran (OT duh)

and about the part of a covert war....duh. its better than an all out war. i would rather us use stuxnet than boots on the ground. a whole let less collateral damage.

war,

Although oil cost would rise, my guess 30%, the world has enough resources for some time if the Straight of Hormuz was closed for six months. Venezuela, Canada, offshore California, oil sands, and we have more natural gas than we know what to do with.


The evil one

...Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States cooperations -- corporations.

Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together....

At this point OWS is still just a nuisance relative to things like the euro crisis, the 2012 election, Chinese monetary policy, and the ME in general. Its challenge is to remain relevant and viable through the run up to the 2012 election. It, and other backlashes from the banking crisis and this year's over-reaching of the republican state-level agenda are worrisome to republicans and rightfully so as it acts as a natural political balance to the Tea Party.

But conspiracies of the [very real] fabric of bankers and corporate directors being able to micro-manage political decisions across a web of nations (at what would amount to hyper-velocities under the best of circumstances) is 'fanciful' at best.