People? Women!?!! (OT)

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 20 of total 256 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Lollie

Social climber
I'm Lolli.
Topic Author's Original Post - Jul 1, 2014 - 06:23am PT
A thread for women's rights and stuff like that. (Post positivity too!)
Doesn't fit into any existing thread.

sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Jul 1, 2014 - 06:31am PT
SCOTUS making decisions based on fairy tales. Unreal.
Jan

Mountain climber
Colorado, Nepal & Okinawa
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:01am PT
Typical. In Japan the scenario was that birth control pills were not available until a few years ago, the government's argument being that they were unsafe. Abortion however was, and the average Japanese woman had had almost three of those. The difference? Doctors made a lot more money off of abortions than pills.

Then Viagra came along and that was cleared by the government in less than six months.Even in Japan, that was a little too much hypocrisy, so after women's organizations protested, the government finally allowed birth control pills.



jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:10am PT
Religion's fine as long as it doesn't supercede federal law.
Jan

Mountain climber
Colorado, Nepal & Okinawa
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:11am PT
No, place the blame on male chauvinism where it belongs. Religion had absolutely nothing to do with the stance of the Japanese government.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:17am PT
Bull. Maybe there, but here it carries tremendous influence.

As to women, my better half is all for equality. And we'll be raising our daughter to be strong and independent.
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:21am PT
Religious people suck.

Yup. And they're more dangerous than other religious freaks like the Taliban, because they're already in this country and they're already influencing policy.

Yes, christians are more dangerous than crazy fanatical islamists, and christians constitute a very real threat to America.
fluffy

Trad climber
Colorado
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:22am PT
Probably has something to do with $$ too DMT

Certainly those justices were paid for, to a large extent, by corporations.

Fcuk a partisan Supreme Court
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:24am PT
It has its place. That place is not telling everyone else how to live.
Flip Flop

Trad climber
Truckee, CA
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:26am PT
When can we start discriminating against religious people based on the fact that they are clearly insane. Imaginary friends? Gods book of lies? Fancy creation mythology? Authoritarian rule books written by angry slavers. C'mon! Any set of religious beliefs is a crazy fantasy if viewed with discrimination. Willfull ignorance and anti-intellect as a governing theology! C'mon!
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:26am PT
On the other hand, the religion of the Left is a pervasive government that controls our lives and thoughts.


You're living in a different millenium. Maybe that's how it used to be last century, but nowadays...

The Left is champion of individual freedom and individual rights.

The Right is the voice of fanatical religious ideology and the substitution of religious laws for Constitutional rights.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:27am PT
On the other hand, the religion of the Left is a pervasive government that controls our lives and thoughts.

It would be cool if that were true!
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:29am PT
Regardless of your ideology or political preferences....

The bottom line is that supreme court now permits discrimination against women. Men do not suffer at all from the ruling.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:36am PT
What if said corporation doesnt believe in any healthcare at all? Then what? Do we protect that too?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 1, 2014 - 07:41am PT
To start with the statements on the op are completely at odds with the facts.

First of all, Hobby Lobby (really the family that owns it) had no problem with birth control coverage, it was paying for abortions that they objected too. (both surgical and chemically induced)

Second, the courts made the distinction between a closely held corporation, that really is no different than a sole proprietorship and a publicly traded company.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 08:01am PT
Slippery slope? Nah... doesn't exist, per other thread topics. So says the liberal left. Try not to use that argument here, eh? Thanks.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 08:10am PT
Oh goody! Next time you (or anyone else) tells me there's no slippery slope in gun control, can I point back at your post above and assure them it does, indeed, exist just as much as the slippery slope in healthcare denial that you're proclaiming here? That would just be ubercool!

Now, carry on with telling me how my logic is faulty and i'm an idiot. You know you want to.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 1, 2014 - 08:14am PT
To start with the statements on the op are completely at odds with the facts.

First of all, Hobby Lobby (really the family that owns it) had no problem with birth control coverage, it was paying for abortions that they objected too. (both surgical and chemically induced)

Second, the courts made the distinction between a closely held corporation, that really is no different than a sole proprietorship and a publicly traded company.

So, the taxpayers end up picking up the slack. If that's the case, then we need universal health care.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 08:18am PT
Oh right, I forgot. We were bellyaching over the trumping of equality and women's rights by fanatical religios BS, in favor of corporate america.

Weren't we also supposed to be celebrating the strong woman role model or something? My buddy's wife just got her CA CCW, and my better half plans on joining her group of girls she meets for coffee to do the same here in NV. Now, my girl is often accused of being super green/liberal, but I guess people can learn to compromise. That, and you could say they're treading upon a world mostly comprised of old conservative white guys. Yay girl power!

Except we shouldn't compromise to allow discrimination based on individual religious beliefs when it comes to corporate conduct.
jonnyrig

climber
Jul 1, 2014 - 08:26am PT
Condoms fail, and plenty of people are allergic to latex. But then, abstinence shouldn't be such a big deal either, right?

What next, you going to tell us Hobby Lobby can deny employment of single unwed mothers because they think that's immoral too?
Messages 1 - 20 of total 256 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta