Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 9681 - 9700 of total 10774 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Jun 26, 2016 - 01:42pm PT
Wow, Clinton up by 12 pts., and it's not even July. Adios orange drumpf! Keep sticking your foot in your mouth every chance you get! Maybe your tiny hands will somehow figure out how to yank it out before you're down by 40...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jun 26, 2016 - 01:45pm PT
ask and you shall receive.

Donald J. Drumpf ✔ @realDonaldDrumpf
George Will, one of the most overrated political pundits (who lost his way long ago), has left the Republican Party.He's made many bad calls


Will responded on "Fox News Sunday," saying: "He has an advantage on me, because he can say everything he knows about any subject in 140 characters and I can't."

Baaaazinga! (no, not BENGHAZIIIIIIII!)

What a con man. If Will, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, had come out in support of Drumpf the orange turd would have responded with, "Great Guy Will. Good Friend".

The MO is beyond obvious yet so many continue to be conned.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Jun 26, 2016 - 01:51pm PT
He's busy trying to book a cabin on the ark on the moon for when drumpf loses. Needs to get off planet and into heaven ASAP.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 26, 2016 - 03:03pm PT
Text Generator In Full Force Here Today

Wahhh, wahhh, oh hand-wringing wahhhhhhhhh.

Here, let me find my wahhhmulance report for you, so that you can call in the help you need.

madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 26, 2016 - 03:04pm PT
trump = greed.

clinton = greed.

You guys are not getting the "progressive" you think you are.

Unless Wall Street and big-banking interests are "progressive."
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 26, 2016 - 03:11pm PT
Isn't it great that the masterful troll posing as Klimmer takes the lords day off.

It's confusing. I asked him if he keeps the Jewish Sabbath, and he assured me that he does.

I suspect that he was being disingenuous, as Saturday-keepers are not Sunday-keepers. I think he knew where I was headed with my line of questioning and went with his lame "keep all days holy" line of garbage.

Who knows?
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Jun 26, 2016 - 03:22pm PT
You guys are not getting the "progressive" you think you are.

Well, speaking for myself, I don't think of Clinton as a progressive. I see her as a center or slightly right of center democrat. However, she's not pushing a platform of alienation in our hugely diverse country, and the other candidate is.

I really think it boils down to the lens people see life through.

Personally, I try, and mostly succeed, at seeing life through a lens of love, rather than hate. I'll be voting for the candidate that seems to me to be more inclusive, rather than exclusive.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 26, 2016 - 03:32pm PT
she's not pushing a platform of alienation in our hugely diverse country, and the other candidate is.

There's some truth to that, imo. Although, I think that her efforts to appear "progressive" have pushed her to adopt some stances (that she probably honestly doesn't adhere to) that are entirely hopeless attempts to split the baby. Those stances, then, end up being divisive.

She should, for example, tell the BLM crew: "We need to ensure that law enforcement affords equal protection for all citizens. However, your hobby horse is misguided, as your 'paradigm' cases of police misusing force against blacks are terrible examples. And, you should be first in line to talk about black lives mattering in the top-five most violent cities in America, yet you have nothing to say about that." Instead she panders to them, and mainstream America ain't buying it. Her stance is just kicking the can down the road, as the situation escalates.

But your overarching point seems to be that she's less flagrantly divisive than His Hairness, and on that I would agree.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jun 26, 2016 - 04:57pm PT
Well, speaking for myself, I don't think of Clinton as a progressive. I see her as a center or slightly right of center democrat. However, she's not pushing a platform of alienation in our hugely diverse country, and the other candidate is.

I really think it boils down to the lens people see life through.

Personally, I try, and mostly succeed, at seeing life through a lens of love, rather than hate. I'll be voting for the candidate that seems to me to be more inclusive, rather than exclusive.

Ummm. Start using reason a bit more. Little less emotion.
Tom

Big Wall climber
San Luis Obispo CA
Jun 26, 2016 - 05:23pm PT
At this point, the best we can do is start thinking ahead, to find someone to replace Hillary in 2020. This presidential election cycle is a lost cause, and all we can do is ensure that the lesser of two evils is chosen, and not that Cheeto-faced Shitgibbon who thinks he's the King of the World.


At the Congressional and local level, we can piggy-back on Shitgibbon's insanity to discredit other Republicans and get them out of office.





The fact is, Hillary is far from being an ideal candidate, but she is the only feasible candidate, at this point.


Hillary has shown herself to be on the payroll of the big banks. Earning hundreds of thousands of dollars for "speeches" is bribery, graft, corruption, or whatever you want to call it. If I give a "friend" a $500 "gift", and she reciprocates with a sex act, that is prostitution. If Hillary earns $500,000 to give a fifteen minute pep-talk to a bunch of Wall Street bankers, that is bribery.



Hillary has intentionally and illegally hidden State Department communications from both the government and the public. This is particularly disturbing, given that the Clinton Foundation has received millions and millions of dollars from foreign nations with which Hillary had official business with as Secretary of State. Those missing emails may very well document conflicts-of-interest, and decisions that have benefited Hillary and her cronies directly, while hurting the United States.

Why else would she hide and destroy those emails?


sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Jun 26, 2016 - 05:26pm PT
Vlad Putin 2020, hammer in one hand, sickle in the other
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 26, 2016 - 06:03pm PT
Tom...maybe because of the same reason this guy did...http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/234999-powell-i-retained-none-of-my-state-emails
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Jun 26, 2016 - 06:04pm PT
35 pdf pages worth or facts all researched and sourced with clickable links ...

There are no facts in there, only propaganda. Here is the fact: Hillary will become our next president in November because God wills it. This will be proven on election day, and there will then be no denying that God preferred Hillary over Trump. You will then have to admit it.

Curt
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Jun 26, 2016 - 06:57pm PT



The off-topic marmot on the face of the moon. No Joke.
overwatch

climber
Arizona
Jun 26, 2016 - 07:07pm PT
You're Canadian. Why bother with this thread? Go drink a Beer and watch a hockey game.

sik burn braj
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 26, 2016 - 07:09pm PT

Klimner everybody else knows now.
We will know in November.

What are you gonna do when Trump goes down? BTW this may well be before November.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 26, 2016 - 07:09pm PT
You're Canadian. Why bother with this thread? Go drink a Beer and watch a hockey game.


HaHaHaHaHahHhhhahahahaha Ay!

only sh#t talkin goin on now, the winner will be cuncluded after the one on one debate..
Norton

Social climber
Jun 26, 2016 - 07:27pm PT
how many Electoral College Votes does it take become President again?
Tom

Big Wall climber
San Luis Obispo CA
Jun 26, 2016 - 08:06pm PT
Bob D'A, Powell didn't destroy or hide his emails. He said that he, personally, didn't retain them, or make copies. He used the State Department's email server, and he is not sure if the State Department saved the emails or not.

Hillary intentionally used an unapproved, personal server, and then defied official requests for the contents of the emails. She claimed that she only wanted to use one Blackberry email device, which is absurd. She traveled with a small army of assistants, any one of which could have juggled a dozen phones and email devices.

The email situation is so strange, and Hillary is so evasive, you have to wonder what motivated her to behave in such a manner while Secretary of State.




I am more disturbed by her taking huge sums from corporations and banks.

Those guys are going to want to get something for their money, and not just a Rah-rah-rah, GO TEAM cheerleader show by an aging matron in a shapeless pantsuit.

Does anybody even know how much of the Clinton Foundation money passes directly to Bill and Hillary? Their net worth skyrocketed over the past decade, or so.


The healthcare "reform" that she (and Obama) are pushing serves mostly to further entrench the obscene profitability of the health insurance, pharmaceutical, medical device and corporate hospital industries.

Nowhere in their "reform" is there any real effort to rein in and control the rapacious health care-related corporations. Some of the most powerful lobbyists in Washington represent those corporations, and Congress and the President willingly do their bidding, and increase their profits and their political power.


Hillary will be a disaster, just not at a Trump level of disaster.




What do you want? AIDS, or cancer.

Norton

Social climber
Jun 26, 2016 - 08:09pm PT
Have lots of doubts about both Trump and Clinton?

Then don't vote!

or maybe write in yourself or the Green Party or Libertarian peope.
Messages 9681 - 9700 of total 10774 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta