Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Bob is correct - if you run analysis on the posts from a couple of years back and now you get some fairly significant differences. They even read different as if the creator felt constrained / bored by the earlier voice.
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
Are you telling me that the problem stems from the fact that they are reputedly actively expanding beyond the original allotment of land given to them after WWII .
Yes.. that is part of the problem.
|
|
Gary
climber
Desolation Row, Calif.
|
|
1. Was not this land originally theirs in the very first place - way back when. Correct me if I am wrong but did they (the Jews) not get expelled from their own land somewhere in the biblical times and it was really their land, in the very first place.
2. Are you telling me that the problem stems from the fact that they are reputedly actively expanding beyond the original allotment of land given to them after WWII .....OR is all of this squabbling over the fact that it was given to them in the first place. Don’t they deserve a home like everyone else has (esp after all they have been through) and was not it really their home, in the first place.
Lois, my family lived on your property 2000 years ago. I'm moving back, be gone by tomorrow. Or else.
Also one more point. Is this really about land or is it really more about the fact that Arabs hate Jews - always have and always will. Is there not an element of irrational hatred of these people just by virtue of the fact that they are Jews. That is how it comes across to me.
It's about land. The three religions have been living together there for hundreds of years.
And before you turn this into a Muslim versus Jew thing, did you know that the founder of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and most vocal proponent of the use of terror, George Habash, was a Christian?
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
They were just pushed out. Yes, it should have been settled by now, but it hasn't been. That is what the palestinians are trying to do. Some with force, and some by negotiations. But the Israeli's are not negotiating in good faith as some of their people believe just like some Muslims believe, that all of the middle east should be theirs.
It is vastly more complicated then that, but that is the nutshell.
Don't try to make it black and white. It is not.
yes.. the Jews have been persecuted, but then so have the Palestinians.
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
Because Israel has not been playing fair and the republicans don't really seem to care.
And you don't need to say.. "Liberals hate Jews". That is a gross distortion and a very very broad stroke. We don't hate Jews, we hate some of the actions Israel has taken. They have been incredibly cruel at times and that has made the situation even more tense. It played right into the radicals hands. Radicals hands on both sides of the equation, because they do exist.
If Israel does it.. the news says.. "they are just protecting themselves".
If a Palestinian does something.. the news says.." another terrorist attack".
It is a terrorist attack, but then so are many of the things Israel has done.
For instance, If you had a kid, and he grew up in Palestine, and you tried very very hard to raise him well. To be kind, to be honest, to be decent and to work hard, But one day his friend is killed in a retaliation by Israel, and nothing you did caused him to get over his anger, until one day he attacked Israel in retaliation for his friends death and is caught.
Even though you tried and tried to stop him, Israel would bulldoze your home and all of your families homes. No questions asked, no court of law.. simply.. he is your son, and we will bulldoze all of his families homes. It didn't even matter if you denounced him and he hadn't lived at home for 20 years.
That is one way they have waged war on terrorism.
|
|
Bob D'A
Trad climber
Taos, NM
|
|
Lois wrote: Bob,
The reason is that he (Karl) has better powers of discernment than you. He is able to tell when I am seriously looking for information. Apparently you cannot. I hate to say this but just maybe he is smarter and can tell the difference. Maybe you can't
Maybe he is...so what is your point?
You are still the biggest troll (20,000 non-climbing posts) that this site has ever seen.
You make bookworm, Skip and SUAP look like midgets.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Lois
XYZ land was given to Israel way back after WW2 and the people who were living in the land were then resentful because they got displaced. Is that correct?
The land was "given" to them buy the British, who were a colonial power. They had just as much right to give away Palestine as they would have had to give India to the Brazilians but even so, the original size of Israel "given" by the British was MUCH smaller than the current state of Israel.
OK, so I have two more questions for you.
1. Was not this land originally theirs in the very first place - way back when. Correct me if I am wrong but did they (the Jews) not get expelled from their own land somewhere in the biblical times and it was really their land, in the very first place.
Well, if you are a bible believer Lois, the Jews conquered the Holy Land by force about 3000 years ago. They had no right to this land except (according to them) God gave it to them (I think the Muslims say God gave them some too) They were told by God to kill every man, woman and child in the cities they sacked. (that's in our bible, not the Koran or something)
It wasn't long before the kingdom was divided and other countries like Babylon (Iraq) and later Rome conquered the same land. By that token, Saddam Hussien had equal claim to Israeli land and the Italians might want it back too (and they took it back during the crusades)
2. Are you telling me that the problem stems from the fact that they are reputedly actively expanding beyond the original allotment of land given to them after WWII .....OR is all of this squabbling over the fact that it was given to them in the first place. Don’t they deserve a home like everyone else has (esp after all they have been through) and was not it really their home, in the first place.
They are much expanded Lois. The excuse is that countries that were upset over Israel being established on land they considered theirs attacked them and Israel thus expanded their borders by military force in response.
Also one more point. Is this really about land or is it really more about the fact that Arabs hate Jews - always have and always will. Is there not an element of irrational hatred of these people just by virtue of the fact that they are Jews. That is how it comes across to me.
Jews were living peacefully in the Land of Israel with Arabs before carving out their Jewish state. When the Muslims ruled the area during history, they were kinder to the Jews than when the Crusader Christians conquered it. That changed when the state of Israel was foisted upon the area by Colonial Power. Two wrongs don't make a right and thus we have a conflict where there is no side without lots of blood on their hands.
Peace
Karl
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
And to make things even worse with the bulldozing.
Lets say that your grandfather was just tired of moving. This was his home. He built it, but his grandson attacked Israel, so Israel will bulldoze his home. Your grandfather doesn't like this and is stubborn and wont move. So you go in to try and get him out and while you are in there, the bulldozers show up and bury you alive. They don't wait, they just show up and start bulldozing.
Maybe you are lucky and get out alive, but your grandfather dies.
Do you think you would just say.. Oh well, he was a stubborn man and deserved to die?
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
Lois, Israel retaliates any kind of attack, such as a rocket attack, a suicide bomber, whatever, by sending troops into Palestine. So yes, the rocket attacks might have originated in Palestine, but not all Palestinians support this. In fact most do not. So there are terrorist attacks, but Israel's response is to make things worse.
Everyone there says their attack is a "retaliation" for an attack by the other side.
That doesn't matter in the case I stated above.
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
There is no due process for Palestinians. If your son commits an attack, then his whole family is deemed to be at fault and they all lose their homes to bulldozers.
At this point I believe that practice has been stopped, but I use it to point out one reason people are upset with Israel.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Lois wrote
I don't hear the same sort of hatred and desire for annihilation coming from the mouths of Jews as I do from Arabs, but so be it.
So then, how, did this thing become a lib versus conservative issue. Just about every lib I know is anti-Jew in this conflict and passes condescending remarks about them with respect to this issue as well as the USA's support of Israel. Just about every conservative I know (including me) seems to have sympathies on the side of the Jewish people. How did this become a lib versus conservative issue over here in the US?
Cause they already won Lois. They have all the power, nuclear weapons, and hold all the cards! If you go to Israel, you'll find plenty of jewish Israelis who despise the Palestinians.
But basically, your prejudiced facts are all wrong. Didn't you see where I noted that FAR more Jewish folks are DEMOCRATs than Republicans. Obviously, they don't see things the way you see them. Nobody here is against Jews, they are against the policies of the state of Israel which pretends to want peace but, in action, is really playing a game of stalling while squeezing Arabs out of stolen territory by making conditions bad and making settlements there against UN resolutions (that even the US approved at the time)
Speaking of Borders, Did you know the state of Israel doesn't have any? They refuse to say what their borders will be. The US has called for the 1967 borders (already much expanded from what the British gave) to be the permanent borders but Israel refuses this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
But how does this line up to a lib versus conservative divide on this issue?
In your mind Lois. Both Conservative and Liberal administrations have supported Israel completely and with extreme bias.
Today, outside of political power, liberals have been more willing to consider the Palestinian justice in their thinking, and that goes for many Liberal Jews as well, who support peace rather than a further land grab.
Many conservative Christians don't care about "justice" for the Palestinians as they believe the Bible says that Jesus will return when the state of Israel occupies the whole of the land there. They want the Armageddon war to happen so Jesus will come back
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Zionism
Christian Zionism is a belief among some Christians that the return of the Jews to the Holy Land, and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, is in accordance with Biblical prophecy. It overlaps with, but is distinct from, the nineteenth century movement for the Restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land, which had both religiously and politically motivated supporters. The term Christian Zionism was popularized in the mid-twentieth century. Prior to that time the common term was Restorationism.[1]
Some Christian Zionists believe that the "ingathering" of Jews in Israel is a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Jesus. This belief is primarily, though not exclusively, associated with Christian Dispensationalism. The idea that Christians should actively support a Jewish return to the Land of Israel, along with the parallel idea that the Jews ought to be encouraged to become Christian, as a means fulfilling a Biblical prophecy has been common in Protestant circles since the Reformation.[2][3][4]
Many Christian Zionists believe that the people of Israel remain part of the chosen people of God, along with the “ingrafted” Gentile Christians[Romans 11:17-24] (dual-covenant theology). This has the added effect of turning Christian Zionists into supporters of Jewish Zionism.
Peace
Karl
|
|
Bob D'A
Trad climber
Taos, NM
|
|
Which Lois underlines and which Lois doesn't? That is really what matters here.
|
|
John Moosie
climber
Beautiful California
|
|
Nope.. I don't fit into your definition. I empathize with everyone who has suffered, be they Jews or Palestinians. At times the Palestinians are wrong, and other times the Israelis are wrong.
It is beyond ugly over there and one would be foolish to blindly believe either side.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
I don't know, Karl, it sounds a tiny bit over-simplistic at best
Of course it's more complicated Lois. The Jewish population in this country is numerous, wealthy and powerful. They are very prominent in the Media and the Israeli Lobby here, which Fatty worked for, is very very influential. If the Jewish voters are against you, you're toast. There is hardly any power in the Islamic vote in the US.
It's FAR from a conservative-Liberal thing. You're perception that LIbs are against Jews or even Israel is pure fantasy. It' a United States and Israel versus the rest of the world issue. Commonly UN resolutions condemning certain Israeli actions are vetoed or voted no by only the US, Israel and a few small states we have strong influence over
Peace
Karl
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
So Lois
Our bad relationship with Islam and the Arabs was basically absent before the creation of Israel. Some folks say, Israel got the land when attacked so it's booty
Ironically, some of the leaders of Israel during history, like Ariel Sharon, Shamir and Begin, used to be terrorists themselves, attacking the British when they ruled that land
from Some pinko site but quoting a paper from British Intelligence citing facts not in dispute
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/irae-j21.shtml
“Present Trends in Palestine”, an MI5 briefing paper written in August 1946, reported on the activities of the Stern Gang. This was the terrorist group that had assassinated Lord Moyne, the British military governor in Egypt in 1944.
“In recent months it has been reported that they [the Stern Gang] have been training selected members for the purpose of proceeding overseas and assassinating a prominent British personality—special reference having been made several times to Mr. Bevin in this connection,” the paper noted.
One of the leading lights of the Stern Group, which had by this time renamed itself Lehi, was Yitzhak Shamir who became prime minister in 1983 and whose tenure in the highest office in Israel was second only to Ben Gurion.
Another paper, “Threatened Jewish Activity in the United Kingdom, Palestine and Elsewhere”, prepared for the Prime Minister Clement Attlee, focused on the activities of the Irgun.
It noted that the Irgun, led by Menachem Begin—later to become prime minister of Israel in 1977—who had a £2,000 price on his head, “was responsible in the past for the liquidation of members of the police and the military whose activities have been judged especially worthy of Jewish resentment in Palestine.”
The paper was written in the aftermath of a terrorist bombing by the Irgun that had in the previous month blown up the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing 91 people—Britons, Arabs and Jews—and injured many more.
Terrorism is what you do when you have no other power. Most of us would do the same thing if our country was occupied.
Peace
karl
|
|
Bob D'A
Trad climber
Taos, NM
|
|
Lois logic...Libs hate Jews, a high percentage of libs vote democrats, a majority of Jews vote Democrats, Jews vote for/with the people that hate them.
|
|
Bob D'A
Trad climber
Taos, NM
|
|
Lois wrote: It was actually all very interesting but unfortunately, Karl, I had to use up all my allotment of questions for at least the next month and a half to two months
Sounds like a lovely relationship...no wonder you spend a huge amount of time here.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Lois wrote
According to him, Palestine was a British protectorate and after the second World War Britain was economically drained and anxious to be rid of its protectorates, at that point. He claims that the Brits did not necessarily favor the conversion of Palestine into Israel but, given their economic and political (drained) status at the time s/p WW2, that they were unable to stem the pressure from the Zionist movement - along with other political forces in effect at that time - toward that end. He also explained a whole lot of the other forces and factors which came into play resulting in the current state of affairs.
Even if that was indeed true, and there may be some truth to it. it would make little difference regarding the question of Palestinian Justice, and not take into account the issue of "were Arabs terrorized out of their homes to flee Israel during it's creation? (or do you believe the party line, that they just chose to abandon their homes)" and the subsequent expansion of Israel via war beyond the British proposal when Israel unilaterally declared themselves a state, prompting an Arab attack
Peace
karl
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|