Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon?

Do you know that your own link says that the pulverized concrete proves that there where explosives planted in the building? Do you agree with that claim?

Until 2007, the California Penal Code Section 26 stated that "Idiots" were one of six types of people who are not capable of committing crimes.
-- Wikipedia

Raymond,

The link is to raw footage. The CBS videographer makes no claims, he is just filming.

Q: What pulverizes concrete to dust?

A: Explosives. Collapse due to the force of gravity does not convert concrete to dust like what was seen on 9-11-2001. Explosives do this

raymond, I am not asking that you answer my questions. In fact, I'm not asking questions. Instead, I'm saying to read the factual accounts of what was going on and discuss those facts, instead of trying to make up questions about stuff that nobody knows about, nor claims to know anything about.

So, do you want to talk about the stuff that we know to be true, or do you want to continue to throw up straw-men that you then bash down?

Do explosives make sound that can be recorded by the many recording devices there, Klimmer?
    monolith

Hell, I thought I was completely unknown, and several guys recognised ME from behind my avatar withing hours of my first post. They even remembered my full name and how I spell it...

Raymond,

The link is to raw footage. The CBS videographer makes no claims, he is just filming.


"I talked about the pdf you posted yesterday."



Q: What pulverizes concrete to dust?

A: Explosives. Collapse due to the force of gravity does not convert concrete to dust like what was seen on 9-11-2001. Explosives do this


"Why is that the case? Can you back up that with science?

What would happened with the concrete if a very high building collapse without the use of explosives?"

“HIGH-ORDER DAMAGE”

NFPA 921

18.3.2 - “High-Order Damage. High-order damage is characterized by shattering of the structure, producing small, pulverized debris. Walls, roofs, and structural members are splintered or shattered, with the building completely demolished. Debris is thrown great distances, possibly hundreds of feet. High-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.”

We see all signs of “high-order damage” in all three building collapses. There is no arguing this. And, it’s very clearly stated “high-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.”

Now if we look at NFPA 921 14.3 “Preservation of the Fire Scene and Physical Evidence” we find the following “the cause of a fire or explosion is not known until near the end of the investigation. Therefore, the evidentiary or interpretative value of various pieces of physical evidence observed at the scene may not be known until, at, or near the end of the fire scene examination, or until the end of the complete investigation. As a result, the entire fire scene should be considered physical evidence and should be protected and preserved.”

It doesn’t get much clearer than this. This is Investigation-101! For, all those debunkers and detractors who say “it’s obvious” why the buildings came down, I beg to differ, and so does the NFPA -”the cause of a fire or explosion is not known until near the end of the investigation.” We are professionals, we are not supposed to jump to conclusions, and we are not supposed to let political and public factors determine what we do and don’t investigate. We definitely are not supposed to destroy the very evidence that will provide the answers. And, when every indicator in “the book” is screaming “high-order” explosive damage, we have a history of prior explosives use by terrorists in those exact buildings, we have over 100 first responders reporting hearing “secondary” explosions, the fact that evidence was destroyed and this wasn’t investigated thoroughly is nothing short of criminal! It’s time to get real loud about this. Our Brothers were murdered. My fellow firefighters, we can’t afford to brush this off to politics or ignore this anymore. Stand up with Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, demand answers, and justice.


------------------------------------------------------------------------“HIGH EXPLOSIVES”

NFPA 921 “18.12.2 High Exlosives…The effects produced by diffuse phase (i.e., fuel-air) explosions and solid explosives are very different. In a diffuse phase explosion (usually deflagration), structural damage will tend to be uniform and omnidirectional, and there will be relatively widespread evidence of burning, scorching, and blistering. In contrast, the rate of combustion of a solid explosive is extremely fast in comparison to the speed of sound. Therefore, pressure does not equalize through the explosion volume and extremely high pressures are generated near the explosion. At the location of the explosion, there should be evidence of crushing, splintering, and shattering effects produced by the higher pressures. Away from the source of the explosion, there is usually very little evidence of intense burning or scorching, except where hot shrapnel or firebrands have landed on combustible materials.”

18.12.2 is very clear. Fuel-air explosions (i.e.- JET FUEL) will be relatively widespread and there will be evidence of burning, scorching, and blistering. If the lobby truly “blew out” from the jet fuel explosion we would see extensive burning, scorching, and blistering. And, think about it, the elevator shafts do not stop in the lobby, they went below the lobby, so why did this apparent “fireball” pick the lobby to exit? Now, carefully look at this video, and you be the judge.

Do you see any signs of burning, scorching, or blistering? On your size-up pay close attention to the plants and the ceiling…do you see ANY soot? is this what you would expect to see after a “jet-fueled fireball” blew out the lobby?

Does this match the damage we would expect to see with solid explosives? (i.e. crushing, splintering, and shattering effects produced by higher pressures).