Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 8561 - 8580 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
anita514

Gym climber
Great White North
Oct 16, 2013 - 09:08pm PT
it's ok. I forgive you.
make up kiss?
anita514

Gym climber
Great White North
Oct 16, 2013 - 09:22pm PT
usually I drop a steamy loaf.
or if it's early in the AM after a couple espressos and not much food, it's more like doo doo butter.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 06:23am PT

I asked about historical examples of rising CO2 leading to higher temperatures. Isn't the effect of increased CO2 levels key to the consensus opinion on AGW? Is it really a stretch to think we've seen similar cause and effect in the past?

It is important to note that it is not necessary that the same or similar things have happened in the past. It is two different questions to ask if higher levels of CO2 (like we have today) would result in higher temperatures or if any such events have occurred in the past.



Nice touch on the red herring angle. "Everybody knows increases in the CO2 concentration cause increases in the global mean temperature." Who cares that no one can produce previous examples? That's irrelevant, right?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas. The theory of greenhouse gases is used to calculate the temperature on the earth and other planets. The theory has been used many times.

What you seems to suggest is that because the neanderthals or the dinosaurs didn't burn fossils or that any similar release of CO2 by for example volcanoes might not have happen or that we don't have enough data of such that events that we cant conclude what is going to happen now?

Do you think in the same way about everything that humans put into the environment in a unnatural way?
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Oct 17, 2013 - 07:50am PT
Conversely, why are there numerous examples of rising CO2 levels lagging behind rising temperatures?

Show us some.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 07:59am PT

Not it's not necessary, but it doesn't give it credibility. Everyone says rising CO2 in the atmosphere causes rising temperatures. But ice core records going back 800 thousand years show rising CO2 levels lagging behind rising temperatures.

My point is simple. If the theory of rising atmospheric CO2 causes global warming, why aren't there examples in the historical record? Conversely, why are there numerous examples of rising CO2 levels lagging behind rising temperatures?


I really can't understand why it should be that hard to understand the point I try to make.

The CO2 that we release into the atmosphere can in this case be considered an input. CO2 is not a natural input to the climate system (that I know about) and it thus mainly follows other signals in the historical record.

We change a parameter in a way that it is not naturally changed and that make it actually strange if you could find similar events in the historical record.

This should be so easy to understand if you had any understanding of dynamical systems.

raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 08:06am PT
Consider the the period of the last glaciations when the climate system where similar to what it is today.

You should ask yourself what mechanism could result in a fast and large rise of the CO2 level in that climate (without being a feedback from the temperature).
anita514

Gym climber
Great White North
Oct 17, 2013 - 08:46am PT
zzzzzz

can we get back to talking about shets? TEH ChIEF was very knowledgeable in that area!
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 09:24am PT
So ipcc should have written about general pollution instead of global warming?
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 09:51am PT
Do you have a point?

It is of course well known that pollutions are bad for us and there are regulations that tries to get rid of some of the pollutions.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 10:21am PT
You are hallucinating again.

It could of course been done more to clean the air but the problem is that it costs money and people like you are of course against it.

raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 10:28am PT

The main thing it costs is people such as yourselves restricting your use of cars, vans etc. Not driving all over to get to where you gotta go and climb etc.

but the chief, you drive 100 times as much as I do and in a car with much worse gas milage.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 10:44am PT
So you have two cars and one motorbike and drive more than I do in half a car and claim that I am not thinking about the environment???!!!!
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Oct 17, 2013 - 11:25am PT
The green agenda really gathered steam with the assembly of the intellectual elite in organizations like the Club of Rome and publication of it's bible "The Limits of Growth" beginning in the late 1960's. In there attempt to gain control and provide direction to the masses of humanity, that are viewed as worse than a virus infecting the body of planet Earth, they hitched their wagons to various vehicles, the most important of them being CAGW whose wheels have come off after being punctured by reality. Most posting here cannot fathom that their view of the world is not an informed evaluation of the state of the world based upon review of the best possible science rather than ideas placed inside their young developing brains and nurtured throughout their youth to the point of now festering forth upon the pages of this forum.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth

http://usacor.org/about/index.html

Unfortunately The Club of Rome is but one of many such organizations seeking to crush progress by way of deception and diversion.



Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Oct 17, 2013 - 11:29am PT
Well, let's be honest, mkay? I am willing to bet gud moolah that per capita-wise The Chief is
right. We do drive a lot and fly a lot.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Oct 17, 2013 - 11:31am PT
Learn how to use "there" will you please.Rick.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Oct 17, 2013 - 11:33am PT
Chief wears cotton.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Oct 17, 2013 - 11:34am PT
Well thanks Wilbeer, i'll try to improve my English sometime in my age limited future.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 17, 2013 - 12:25pm PT
i'll try to improve my English sometime in my age limited future.

and may I suggest you also improve your science... and math... and history? Boy, you have your work cut out for you... but at least you're willing to try.

I agree, simple spelling is a good place to start for someone at your level.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 17, 2013 - 12:32pm PT

Most posting here cannot fathom that their view of the world is not an informed evaluation of the state of the world based upon review of the best possible science rather than ideas placed inside their young developing brains and nurtured throughout their youth to the point of now festering forth upon the pages of this forum.

When did this start? In kindergarten? When we learned about differential equations and statistics? Did they manage to brainwash us so well that for example an ODE actually have 3 solutions instead of the taught 1 solution? Is the least squares method just a liberal concept? Is everything just a hoax?
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Oct 17, 2013 - 12:33pm PT
Messages 8561 - 8580 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta