Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
anita514
Gym climber
Great White North
|
|
why are you such a hater, The Chief?
like what, only you are allowed to know things, or to have had a rough life, etc?
all you do is shiit all over people's lives. why? is it because you're so much better than them? or because you keep it real?
why the fuk are you such a crabby little bitch?
|
|
anita514
Gym climber
Great White North
|
|
why are you so concerned with me getting laid, mental midget?
this is how Chief Rocka keeps it real.. thug life, bitches
|
|
anita514
Gym climber
Great White North
|
|
if only you knew who flew up to Montreal to see my lardoass!
|
|
anita514
Gym climber
Great White North
|
|
hmm, I counted 3 edits to that last post.
why you suck so hard??
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Good sh!t talking ya all except for the FortMentäl case guy.
He's too fuking serious.
He can't handle it (pussy) so instead has to make stooopid picture.
FortMentäl probably never played ball ....
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
OH ... got it.
That's why he's so fuking serious.
We kicked and threw him around for years .....
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
really getting kind of sad, isn't it?
This thread is NOT like the Repubs are wrong thread at all.
Why?
Because stupid Norton is not in it.
Go back to where you belong ya moron,
|
|
BASE104
Social climber
An Oil Field
|
|
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grow up that is familiar with it.
This has happened. When plate tectonics suddenly explained everything, quite elegantly, there were some old timers who couldn't let go of geosynclinal theory, because they had published and built their careers on it.
Eventually they died off, to be honest. Now geosynclinal theory is a footnote that most young geologists have never heard of. Type "geosynclinal theory" into wiki and it will take you to a short page describing its replacement by plate tectonics, which is a simple theory. Geosynclinal theory was so damn complicated and weird that its exit was not missed.
Any scientist who spends his time writing for the Wall Street Journal and not publishing is a goner. He has passed his prime and is now a politician.
|
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
Really Wyna, who is deluded,the originator of the above posted diatribe or the subject? Seems to me the date on the peice was 2010, so we have three more years of evaluation since. Lindzen is right, whether the IPCC admits clearly or not the climate sensitivity estimates of a doubling of co2 are trending downwards. The expected values of positive feedbacks relentlessly hyped by the supposed 97% consensus ( odd, their was no Cook et al study in 2010) is being drowned out by effects of under appreciated and ignored negative feedbacks- witness the 15 year atmospheric warming hiatus the hotheads do their best to lie about. And to try to explain away the fiasco of climate gate doesn't wash with the public or scientific community at large.
Ahh Base, the reluctant hero, forever searching out more petroleum deposits to power our modern way of life and make up for the inadequacies of "green energy".
|
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
Mono, what you and others living in the delusional realm don't get is that in the real world effects like ENSO, volcanism, solar fluctuations, and many other effects can never be seperated from the raw data-they create the raw data. If you don't get this you are forever doomed to Lala land.
|
|
wilbeer
Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 - 07:48am PT
|
"inadequacies of "green energy""
Says the FF stockholder.
There is only one reason for this smear. Big Oil
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 - 11:20am PT
|
what you and others living in the delusional realm don't get is that in the real world effects like ENSO, volcanism, solar fluctuations, and many other effects can never be seperated from the raw data-they create the raw data.
That's cute... Dr. Al Siding thinks he knows something he is clearly clueless about.
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 - 11:42am PT
|
That's cute... you can't trust science or scientists, unless the Chuffer agrees with them, then you best recognize the awesome intellectual authority of ONE Prof Emeritus because they are at MIT.
According to an April 30, 2012 New York Times article, "Dr. Lindzen accepts the elementary tenets of climate science. He agrees that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, calling people who dispute that point "nutty." He agrees that the level of it is rising because of human activity and that this should warm the climate." However, he believes that decreasing tropical cirrus clouds in a warmer world will allow more longwave radiation to escape the atmosphere, counteracting the warming. Lindzen first published this "iris" theory in 2001, and offered more support in a 2009 paper, but today "most mainstream researchers consider Dr. Lindzen’s theory discredited" according to the Times article.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Oct 10, 2013 - 12:13pm PT
|
So The Chief, how does bashing MIT and it's professors relate to the topic at hand--climate science?
The Chief cannot stick to the topic if his view is shown to be muddied by opinion instead of by fact.
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 - 12:40pm PT
|
You all bash dudes like Lindzen, you are bashing the institution
I must have missed the point where anyone where bashed Lindzen as a person or MIT as an institution. They may have bashed the research in question, but can you really blame them?
Dr. Lindzen acknowledged that the 2009 paper contained "some stupid mistakes" in his handling of the satellite data. "It was just embarrassing," he said in the Times interview.
You on the other hand... everyone bashes you because you are an idiotic blowhard who doesn't know sh#t about sh#t, yet you continue to insist you do and that your UNINFORMED OPINION is somehow relevant.
Awesome... sketch posted a link to a blog... I'm sure it is fully of factual information and totally relevant to climate science. I can't wait to read it!
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 - 12:42pm PT
|
And the list will grow..
You are the person that made that connection and your list of crap universities and organizations is already much much longer and probably even consist of every university in the world.
Your and your peers view is so ridiculous. You have no problem to discredit most scientists but still make authority arguments when your favorite scientists are discussed.
Hansen is for example the worst person on earth and should be ignored even though he is employed by Nasa. Spencer on the other hand is a very important authority because he has been working with Nasa.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!