Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
jonnyrig
Trad climber
formerly known as hillrat
|
|
oh yeah, climate-
last weekend the temperature dropped, and i got a cold. how,s that for empirical evidence? ha!
ok, somebody graph that please...
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
The Marine Iguana population in the Southern Pacific continues to drop.
|
|
Gary
Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
|
|
Why did miners worry about canaries in the mines? They were just a bunch of stupid birds.
|
|
Skeptimistic
Mountain climber
La Mancha
|
|
Polar Bears are scary and they bite people. Good riddance!
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
they "modify" their stances regularly.. wonder why lol!
They didn't modify their stance on Arctic ice you stupid fukwad.
I saw a bald eagle today.
Go fuk yourself.
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
hey!
It is going to get down into the 50's here in New Mexico tonight.
Do you even know how cold that is in the desert?
Conclusion: all of those Elite Scientists are just wrong wrong I tell you about GW
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Or quietly gluing jackalopes?
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
^^^^ Illiterate, but dumps his "Blah blah blah" nonetheless. ^^^^^^^
|
|
climbski2
Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
|
|
Simple question The Cheif
Does an increase in atmospheric Co2 concentration increase total atmospheric heat content?
|
|
climbski2
Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
|
|
Then does it have no affect or does it reduce atmospheric heat content?
and uhm..this chart you posted sure seems to show a conclusive correlation between co2 concentration and temperature. Cause and effect could be argued although the graph supports both possible simple conclusions at various periods. ie delta c either precedes and trails delta t at times.
Your shorter term ones do not necessarily contradict the correlation due to the short time period involved.
I will grant we are in an era of untested limits to the clear historical correlation. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Mmm Not so much. Experiments like this seem somewhat reckless to me. I will hope/pray for an unforeseen low environmental impact source of high buffer.
Otherwise that red line appears about to go high into uncharted territory.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Do the chief even look at his own graphs? Why did he post the first one? What are we supposed to see?
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
What a cop out.
You can 't bother to learn even the most basic math and science concepts listed above yet you still opine on them.
You're just another willfully ignorant, illiterate, dumbass who can't keep his big fat mouth shut. F*#k you.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
So you are a religious nutcase that believe in some supernatural laws (probably libertarian) about the universe.
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
BUT, I do have faith in the laws that are in place that run the big show.
"The Truth".
I.e., "BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH."
Fukk you.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
The chief, i did of course know that you and your peers believe in the "truth" that climate change is not man made. It is the only thing you claim over and over and it is obvious that your only arguments are that you "know" that it can't happen. The data from the world and the science doesn't matter at all for you because you already know the "truth".
|
|
climbski2
Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
|
|
The cheif let me simplify.
The graph you posted very obviously does not support your conclusion.
BUT, I do have faith in the laws that are in place that run the big show.
OOOKAYYY that's nice. Not sure what you are getting at though. Do you think there is some law that assures man cannot cause global warming? Or reverse it if man causes it?
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
The Queef wrote:
there is no turning back and earth will end up in a situ identical to Venus via the Runaway Greenhouse Effect.
NO scientist who knows anything about anything would EVER say that. And only a willfully ignorant fukwad could ever imagine they would.
|
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
I see "the collective" here has made a resurgence. Even old Ed, who i don't want to piss off to badly since i hope to recruit him for inconsequential, obscure, untrodden, adventure climbs in the big void, has shaken the embarassment of realization of ideological tainting to rejoin this futile battle.
The problem with you hotheads and your cult of doom (besides the obvious fact that observations do not match the tales of calamity you spin) is that you are one dimensional, veritable flat earthers, unable to grasp the multiplicity of dynamics of the higher states of order governing life and it's evolution on this earth. You've taken a single physical effect, the ability of the CO2 molecule to intercept radiant energy of a narrow bandwidth and then reradiate 6-8% earthwards to trigger all sorts of hypothesized positive feedbacks to create an artificial, ever escalating loop of doom. In your flat earth modeling negative feedbacks are given short consideration if considered at all, little valuation is given to solar variation and it's myriad of direct and amplified effects, the cause and effects of oceanic currents and turnover are little understood. little consideration is given to earths lifeforms and their abilities to regulate climate somewhat as a thermostat.Etc, etc., etc.
When will you guys get your heads out of your asses to face the light of day?
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!