Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 8041 - 8060 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:02pm PT
I happy to say I got to climb with Jeff a couple of times. He liked to hog all the leads, though. We were going to meet at Josh and take a photo of him appearing to be drilling a bolt on Double Cross. Too bad it didn't work out.

An Ouch! masterpiece:
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:28pm PT
I don't understand why you guys continue to play with dribbling mess Chuff insists on spewing from his sputtering as#@&%e.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:42pm PT
Holy fuk you are a clueless idiot with absolutely no understanding of anything even remotely applicable to this topic.

The subtle drop, which suggests a doubling of atmospheric carbon would increase mean global temperatures by between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees celsius, rather than the earlier range of between 2 and 4.5 degrees
dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:47pm PT
Lol, Why is Ron Rong about everything?
WBraun

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:49pm PT
No way Jose ...

Me and Ron Rong are intelligent about everything ......
dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 12:51pm PT
Lol, rong and chief are scientifically illiterate, but too stoopid and arrogant to know when to keep their yappers shut.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:11pm PT
I'm sorry Rong. There is just no way around it. You don't know what the fuk you are talking about. You are as clueless about science as I am about jackalope anuses. The more you and the chuff and Dr. Al Siding post, the dumber you look.... and just when it looks like you can't get any dumber, you post more.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

There is another possible explanation for—or, at least, influence on—climate change. This involves natural factors, most notably the Sun and Earth's oceans.

It has been shown time and time and time again that those "natural factors" DO NOT explain the observed warming. But you are too stupid to realize it, so you keep on with the bullsh#t.

We at the Almanac are among those who believe that sunspot cycles and their effects on oceans correlate with climate changes.

Those in science don't have to "believe" in such bullsh#t, because it has been studied in more detail than your little glue sniffing brain could ever imagine. We KNOW those natural factors do not explain the observation. We KNOW the most likely cause, with quantifiable certainty, is increased CO2 in the atmosphere... put there by humans.

Studying these and other factors suggests that a cold, not warm, climate may be in our future.

You and your fellow idiots wouldn't know the first thing about how to study "these and other factors." You don't know the first thing about it. You are willfully ignorant fukheads.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:13pm PT

the only f*#king clueless idiots here are the ones buying the pig in a poke.

That means you wessie peeHdeedidllydoo..


Instead they have opted for plan B. When in doubt and your side looks weak,, start calling names. This however does not add relevance but rather detracts from relevance.

I think you would have a better point in the second quote if you didn't wrote what can be found in the first quote.
raymond phule

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:16pm PT

It is always fun to see that your link disprove your claim.
anita514

Gym climber
Great White North
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:19pm PT
Chia Chef:
Her publicly announced "open orifices" has obviously allowed any last potential brain matter that she may have had, to flee her skull.


seems to me you're the only one bringing up other people's orifices.
is there a graph charting the Chief's orifice obsession, perhaps?
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:26pm PT
Uh oh, the chuff is back

dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:30pm PT
No I do not have a theory Rong.

Do you know what a theory is? If so you would know why I don't have one.

And since I have a only a rudimentary understanding of the science here, though I have some formal science and math training, I prefer to listen to the experts who have spent years and years looking at this instead of cherry picking information and making up sheet opinions like you and chief seem to do, even though both of you are very illiterate. It would be funny except for the fact there are far too many of you, and the consequences of denialism are severe. It's depressing that dunces like you two who reject education and learning as elitism (maybe out of insecurity about penis size?) have sway.
WBraun

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:33pm PT
Dirtbag -- " I prefer to listen to the experts ..."

That is why we have unlimited wars, famine, genocide, global corruption etc etc etc ....

Man are you ever stupid .......
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:34pm PT
What a bunch of fuking idiots!

Good thing not a single one has any real influence on this or any other issue.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:37pm PT
Yes mono... that is how they KNOW it is the TRUTH... it looks pretty, supports their preconceived ideas (as far as they know), and doesn't have all those confusing numbers and symbols and stuff.

Really rong? 60% recovery? From what?


Fuking idiot.
dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:44pm PT
Werner that's a stupid post. The fact is, we need experts to advise us of certain things. Because NEWSFLASH-- this sheet is incredibly complicated. And you me and rong don't have the foggiest idea, or time , to figure out what is going on.

So sure , any joe jack off like Rong can have an opinion ,but why are joe jack offs given any weight?
WBraun

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:44pm PT
Good thing not a single one has any real influence on this or any other issue.

Yes ... materialistic experts always fail .....

Everything you so called jackass experts have touched since you stepped on the shores of humanity has gone to sh!t ......
raymond phule

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:46pm PT
Interesting plot the chief because the temperature from 98 obviously do not agree with any other plot that even you have shown before.

dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:47pm PT
Chief when you understand the math and science-- really understand it-- I'll listen to you. But all you do is jerk off. You don't know sheet about the science or math but you never shut up. All you are is some big mouth, a loud fart on the Internet. You and rong both.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Oct 4, 2013 - 01:53pm PT
hahaa... Farmer's Almanac... hahahaaaaa... you fuking dipshit!

In the October 1981 issue of Weatherwise, pages 212-215, John E. Walsh and David Allen performed a check on the accuracy of 60 monthly forecasts of temperature and precipitation from the Old Farmer's Almanac at 32 stations in the U.S. They found that 50.7 percent of the monthly temperature forecasts and 51.9 percent of the precipitation forecasts verified with the correct sign. These may be compared with the 50 percent success rate expected by chance.
Messages 8041 - 8060 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta