Abort Abortion?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 81 - 100 of total 194 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
TradIsGood

Trad climber
Gunks end of country
Mar 6, 2006 - 06:54pm PT
Happie, if you want to learn the simplest topic (mean or average) in statistics, new thread, or e-mail me. Or check wikipedia.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 06:57pm PT
Stinky,

I disagree. It has nothing to do with life and everything to do with women's bodies. There is simply no definition of life or any other aspect of reproduction that in anyway abrogates a woman's control over her own body. There is no other discussion - only distraction away from a woman's fundamental [human] right to freedom and privacy.
stinky

climber
Guymon OK
Mar 6, 2006 - 06:57pm PT
If the debate, anger and killings (if they are killings), force us to question our beliefs and the conduct our being, yes.

If they cause us to dig deeper into our defensive rationalizations, disrespect others and ourselves with dogmatic obfuscations, no.
Apocalypsenow

Trad climber
Cali
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:01pm PT
So healyje,

The abortion occurs and labor is induced. But the fetus/baby is still alive. What does the doctor do now?
spyork

Trad climber
Fremont, CA
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:02pm PT
So if a woman from South Dakota tries to leave the state, would you:

a) Wave and sing 'Happy Trails to you'
b) Make her take a pregnancy test?
c) make her sign an affadavit stating she will not visit a planned parenthood clinic?
d) Strap a transponder onto her that sets off an alarm if she ventures near the GPS coordinates of a planned parenthood site?

Hey, if abortion is murder, you know you can't go halfway, then you would be a hypocrite.
Matt

Trad climber
places you shouldn't talk about in polite company
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:02pm PT
ragmeat wrote:
I am saying that a man should not have to support the child if the woman chooses not to terminate the pregnancy. I don't give a sh#t about whether or not the child is born, the point is to keep poverty from taking over the already low-income sections of cities and the nation as a whole.

here is the inexperienced and unworldly child of some rightwing loudmouth who thinks he can engineer some aspect of society to his liking on the backs of poor women by making their family planning choices even more bleak than they are now.

can't you just imagine the conversations at the dinner table at their house?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:06pm PT
Apocalypsenow - there are a million scenarios. In that one I'd say the an abortion was taking place at the request of the woman, not a birth, and the fetus should be killed.
TradIsGood

Trad climber
Gunks end of country
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:08pm PT
Matt, you are the first person ever to call me a loudmouth. Everybody complains that I do not speak loud enough and that I am hard to hear. Unless you are talking about my wife, who presumably you have never met. And she is not a loud-mouth either.

When your mate does not have an abortion, will you be teaching your offspring to call other people names? Or is that genetic?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:09pm PT
Roger, your logic is so convoluted at this point it's nonsensical. And your ever racist vinettes say about all one needs to about your lack of any [mature and] cogent standing in the matter.
WBraun

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:10pm PT
Without male involvement,

Yes, good logic Rajmit ....

Yes they will not be able to penetrate into the finer subtilities which you are pointing to.
stinky

climber
Guymon OK
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:10pm PT
Healyje,
You deny the existence of the anti-abortion movement.
"There is simply no definition of life or any other aspect of reproduction that in anyway abrogates a woman's control over her own body."
There is a definition of life that does exactly that. It is the definition of those who oppose abortion. In their eyes it is privacy vs. murder.
If it is your contention that until birth privacy trumps the "right to life", that is a valid argument. But unless I misunderstand you, that is not your position.
I read that you are defending "a woman's fundamental [human] right to freedom and privacy." against what you believe is an illegitimate claim of human rights made by the patriarchy on behalf of the fetus. If this is the case, the the question of what life is, is exactly the relevant question.
If debate is to progress, you have to join it, not just build a wall against the rival opinion.
WBraun

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:29pm PT
Hey

Where did everybody go?

This thread is like a speeding train that lost it's breaks at the curve and then went over the cliff into .... (obliviation?).
Matt

Trad climber
places you shouldn't talk about in polite company
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:35pm PT
TG- you are being called a loudmouth because a kid doesn't develop these kinds of ideas in a vacuum.

H- he is a kid, he has never known a poor woman personally, and he is not operating w/ logic, he is repeating the opinions of others and is dependent on their (albeit limited) logic.

WB- i am gone too...
WBraun

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:37pm PT
No no I disagree, Matt

He does have very good logic at times, it can be carried over from a past life, and is not indicative by ones age in this life.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:37pm PT
Stinky (and Werner / Roger),

Again, it isn't a matter of "joining the discussion". A woman's fundamental [human] right to freedom and privacy is non-negotiable. Period. Anything that infringes or compromises either of those rights (or any other right) deserves nothing but steadfast opposition. Ditto for freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, privacy - three other freedom's likewise under "discussion" by this administration...
WBraun

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:40pm PT
healyje

Who gives the rights?
stinky

climber
Guymon OK
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:40pm PT
I disagree. The debate (as I see it) is about conflicts between these fundamental freedoms.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:42pm PT
Freedom is never so absolute, Healyje.
Apocalypsenow

Trad climber
Cali
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:42pm PT
healyje,

A woman fully intends to have an abortion...but puts it off. She is rushed to the hospital during a miscarriage but the 5 month old survives. Does she still have the right to kill it, because she did intend to have an abortion?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 07:42pm PT
Stinky, That's the difference. There is no conflict.

Werner - [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inalienable_rights" target="_blank"]inalienable[/url]
Messages 81 - 100 of total 194 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta