Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Have you seen the video you are talking about? The sounds that is supposed to be the explosives seems to happened when the building have already been falling down for more than a second.
Your argument seem to prove that the sounds is just sounds from the falling building because it seems to be a delay in time from the start of the collapse.
|
|
ntanygd760
Gym climber
roanoke, TX
|
|
the government had help to hide the fact it was a controlled demolition. It is so obv who helped them I don't have a clue how you can't see it.............
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Is it a single building in that movie that crash down in even the slightest way similar to WTC, i.e. from the top with a cloud of debris going down with the building?
I guess it is necessary to think outside the box. They couldn't pull the buildings in the usual way because it would be to obvious so they pulled the buildings in a novel way from the top instead from the bottom.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
Rox, still no audio of bombs pulverizing the building and turning it to dust during the collapse as K-Man and Klimmer (our Special K's) claim.
One of the most recorded events in history, and nada.
A standard demo is loud, very loud. That's on a prepped building using very little explosives. No pulverization. Think of the amount of explosives needed to pulverize an entire building and the sound it would produce.
Why would the NWO want to pulverize a building?
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
It's easy to fool the fools, especially when they willingly deny evidence. Eye witnesses, photographic evidence, physical evidence.
118 firefighters say they experienced explosions. Dozens of civilians claim the same. There is photographic and video evidence.
If you watch the videos posted, you will see one where all the windows in the WTC Tower's lobby were blown out by a blast. The video is taken from the inside, so it's before the building fell.
You cannot make that up, there is a video of it.
But, the Believers, all they want to do is deny it. "I don't see any explosions in that film, that booming sound could be a phone book hitting the floor."
Remember, you are spitting in the face of 118 firemen. What about the clip that shows the firemen pulling out of the buildings because they fear *another* bomb might go off.
Deny that one too, eh?
I don't find it odd that not a single Believer can give even a faint whisper as to why a $14 million investigation aggressively avoided doing a simple test for explosives with the WTC dust, and then lied about why they did not do the test!
I don't find it odd that not a single Believer can give even a faint whisper as to why a $14 million investigation aggressively avoided doing a simple test for explosives with the WTC dust, and then lied about why they did not do the test!
Until a Believer attempts to view that fact through an objective lens, each Believer must admit to themselves that they are denying the obvious.
The NIST report is a whitewash. Admit it.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
The FBI and BATF tested for explosives at Fresh Kills K-Man. They also had explosives detecting dogs there as well. Nothing, nada.
Gravity is a powerful force K-Man. That's what pulverized the buildings.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Mono, source?
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
I always have to do the work for you K-Man. It will come. Some of us work for a living. I'll just leave you hanging for now.
Why are you so ignorant about these things?
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Wow mono, you beg me to provide sources for the claims that I make. Ridicule me when I don't. And I show you where to look, provide videos, etc.
Now I get this from you?
You make the most blatant lying claim, and then run when I ask for a source.
Priceless.
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
k-man,
In the 60's the Chicago Convention Center, a steel and concrete structure,
burned and collapsed. The fire started from a short circuit in a lamp in
the Home Show which spread to the carpet, etc.
The WTC had a bit better of a 'starter' - about 36 TONS of Jet A.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
I never ask you for link's K-Man. It's you who ask them from me. Google is your friend.
No one's running K-Man. Keep alert for the rest of the day. But of course, you will deny them.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
I never ask you for link's K-Man.
- monolith, Sep 8, 2011 - 08:50am PT
Really, K-Man, you won't give us a link?
- monolith, Sept 4, 2011 - 8:01pm PT
Still waiting for that audio of the bombs
- monolith, Sept 7, 2011 - 10:26am PT
You don't have to look far to find a lie coming from monolith.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Right on Dingus! I hear ya. Keep it real...
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
Good one K-Man.
And I never got the link, cuz it doesn't exist.
And since you chose to cut off the end of my request, I'll repeat it below:
Still waiting for that audio of bombs pulverizing the building during collapse.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Look guys, you wouldn't need audio or video processing to detect the presence of explosions resulting from shaped charges capable of cutting the WTC exterior curtain walls - they would be way, way more than obvious. The audio of those explosions would both crack and boom through the audio and the pressure wave and debris ejection of the charges going off on the exterior walls would be a radical linear visual event and grossly distinguishable.
Again, neither would require any form of audio processing or video close-ups to detect. And all of the WTC videos show what happened that day - top down collapses of the towers, talks of charges in the basements is debunked by simply watching any of the videos you've posted.
Fools are easily fooled...
...is right and, as Dingus points out, the most telling aspect of any 9/11 discussion is the employment of the word 'believers' as a [futile and pathetic] leveling device.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
That's why we ask for audio everytime they say the building was 'pulverized' and 'turned to dust' by bombs during the collapse. As you say Healy, it would be heard for miles.
Notice how K-Man cut off the end of my request above. It's a question they always dance around.
|
|
Homer
Mountain climber
742 Evergreen Terrace
|
|
If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then maybe I should spend more time obsessing and arguing about it, instead of using the time to help my kids with their homework.
It makes me feel so bad to be such a sheeple.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
monolith, aren't you going to provide links to the outrageous claims you make? You know, about the FBI doing tests for explosives?
I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong, but I never claimed to have an audio or video of bombs pulverizing the WTC buildings. So please stop asking me for things that I never claimed I have.
What I did claim was that MANY people witnessed, first-hand, explosions. And I can readily supply links to those videos *again*.
monolith, I've proven once that you fabricate lies. Unless you provide the source to the claim you made about the FBI explosion tests, I can make a solid conclusion that you are a habitual fabricator of lies.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
And the tail chasing begins again.
Links to people hearing loud noises does not prove the building was 'pulvarized' and 'turned to dust' by bombs during the collapse when none of the many audio recordings show these massive explosions.
That's so funny you don't think the FBI did a criminal investigation of the steel at Fresh Kills.
Why would any link possibly convince you?
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
The Village Fool calls me an Idiot
Let us know!