Fattrad nuked - classic

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 701 - 720 of total 863 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
Feb 15, 2012 - 12:53pm PT

Everybody's restless and they've got no place to go
Someone's always trying to tell them
Something they already know
So their anger and resentment flow. . . .

(Warren Zevon). . .
apogee

climber
Feb 15, 2012 - 12:55pm PT
jstan

climber
Feb 15, 2012 - 01:00pm PT
I think the psychiatrist purposely put a pea under one of the pillows on this couch.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 15, 2012 - 01:02pm PT
I think the psychiatrist purposely put a pea under one of the pillows on this couch.

LOL! You shouldn't do that during business hours, John. Now everyone is wondering what it is that has me in stitches, and hoping it's not them.

John
John Moosie

climber
Beautiful California
Feb 15, 2012 - 01:03pm PT
I think the psychiatrist purposely put a pea under one of the pillows on this couch.

hahaha.. too funny Jstan.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 15, 2012 - 01:55pm PT
Y'all are dangerously close to having to get a room, for the duration.
michaeld

Sport climber
Sacramento
Feb 15, 2012 - 01:59pm PT
Such a joke... Never meeting CMac or knowing much about him other then running a business, being extremely involved in the climbing community, and word of mouth being a nice cool guy, I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that...

Fattrad has some sort of a compulsive disorder where it makes him feel the need to make his authority known on a community forum, not relating to any sort of LEO's forum. He's often paranoid of, well, everything.

Sure he's a climber, and most climbers (probably from smoking all of that fuel soaked weed) are kind of out there, but that's fine. It's what makes all you guys so neat and interesting. His ranting about Obama, cops tasering innocent people, or just flat out ridicule'd arguments are sometimes entertaining, but also extremely annoying.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and is fortunate to have the 1st Amendment behind their [Post this Reply] button, but he went too far too many times in too many threads on too many topics.

And if that whole thing about office break in, four stolen computers, and reporting the administrators of this site in the report is true... Who wouldn't ban him? He's obviously an extremely paranoid individual.

To be honest; with how he posts, and the way he words and starts aggressively flaming people for posting, I don't think he'd pass a psyche test to get into an LEO academy of any kind. Okay maybe Paladin Security co.


My $10.25.
nature

climber
Aridzona for now Denver.... here I come...
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 15, 2012 - 02:04pm PT
I think you are all missing an important sequence of events issue here.


Fatty got banned.

Fatty got his office broken into

Police questioned him and asked "who doesn't like you"

Fatty respond - RJ and CMAC.

His ousting had NOTHING to do with what he said to the police.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:20pm PT
The dime-ing of cmac is what is going to keep him off.
michaeld

Sport climber
Sacramento
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:20pm PT
Lol, volunteer cop?
apogee

climber
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:26pm PT
"His ousting had NOTHING to do with what he said to the police."

No, fattrad wasn't ousted as retribution because he went to the cops....

fattrad went to the cops and implicated (by name) CMac & RJ AFTER he was ousted.

That's really disturbing, and enough to renounce any support for the return of fattrad that I have made on his behalf.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:30pm PT
My best guess:
Locker is now testing the limits. For how long will he be allowed to attack, not without reason, the troll that is now gone, before he himself is nuked.

Locker: Right? Wrong?
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:33pm PT
Maybe you will be surprised. ;o)

Edited: I'm no supporter of Fattrad's return, but come what come will.
jstan

climber
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:39pm PT
Think about it for a moment. The stolen computers would have had data on them from Jeff's customers. There was a breach of security. How would Jeff want that breach reported to his customers?

1. Quite out of the blue my office was broken into and information was stolen. All the names of the owners and account ID's were encrypted but still information was lost.

2. I got into a tiff with the owner of a (non-porno) web site and was banned from the site. Some of the graphics on the site are pornographic, but that is not why I went to the site many times each day. But he was such a personal enemy he may have been involved in breaking into my office.

Go ahead. Choose.

Edit:
TC:

With millions of customers BofA has to report the theft of a laptop. But Jeff does not have to keep his customers informed?

Seriously?

For my own part I heard Jeff say more than enough reasonable things to convince me he was trolling most of the time on ST. Just to get a reaction.

The Evil One?

Oiy veh.

Maybe I have to say the obvious. Locker is right. Jeff would never have mentioned a minor tiff with ST. Irrelevant. He is just stirring the pot. Again.

Some real damage to Jeff comes about if the authorities happen onto the nonsense here.

We need to stop this right now.
apogee

climber
Feb 15, 2012 - 02:56pm PT
Hoo-boy, this is starting to get weird.

There's plenty of ST Repubs who will write this off coming from a Lib, but the more I'm learning about this, the less confident I am in fattrad's role in this circus.

Though we've clearly been on opposite sides of the ideologic fence, I've made my appreciation for fattrad clear many times prior to his ousting, and since he got the boot, I've been a supporter of his return.

The more I've been learning about it, and with the potential for who-knows-how-much is not evident to any of us, the more it seems that my support was misplaced...until/unless the real skinny ever comes out. Which is entirely unlikely.
Jingy

climber
Somewhere out there
Feb 15, 2012 - 03:06pm PT
I personally think that the banning occurred after dudes had slandered CMacs thread with un-called-for junk postings.

The fact that fattard dropped a name (by stating "it couldn't have been..." before the namedropping is meaningless: The fact is by mentioning a name of a common citizen means that that name goes onto a record.

It would have been different if fat had said "It couldn't have been Obama", "It couldn't have been Feinstein", "It couldn't hace beebn Elvis" because each of those people have pretty good alibies.
By dropping the name CMac or RJ might mean that they would have to answer needless questions, and that would waste the time of PD involved.

If I was that cop asking the question and fat gave that answer I would have advised "I didn't ask who you thought couldn't have done this... The question is "Do you have any enemies? Or who do you think might have done this?"

Just answer the question....


Just the facts!!!
Meow Now

Trad climber
Emerald City
Feb 15, 2012 - 03:09pm PT
Supertopo-Fattrad Nuked- Fatty stirs the pot, from afar, and all jump in...

I thought you guys were intelligent? :)

Trolling

Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 15, 2012 - 03:31pm PT
Which one of those guys was "a saint" previously?
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Feb 15, 2012 - 03:34pm PT
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Feb 15, 2012 - 03:55pm PT
Hi Tomcat

I have asked about total deletion before and was informed that you cannot do
anything about it as everything you posted belongs to the website.

I guess you just stop posting, and forget about it.
Messages 701 - 720 of total 863 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta