Health Care changes

Yeah, well, invading countries on a pre-emptive premise & no direct evidence of aggression is against the law, too...and you guys didn't have any trouble making that happen, did you?

Do you not see the hypocrisy of the position of your Party on HR? The ACA was a good idea when your POTUS candidate created it, and now it's a bad idea because the Democrat POTUS implemented it.

Again, the necessary correction.... What state and local entities agree to do that you call "socialism" is contemplated by the Constitution. When the feds do similar things, particularly redistribution of the fruits of individual labor to other individuals, that is indeed socialism in the worst sense.

Fortunately the courts disagree with you--federal income taxes being one excellent example.

I don't oppose federal income taxes. I oppose a portion of those taxes being used for non-Constitutionally-approved purposes: wealth redistribution.

Still waiting...

Show me one Republican politician that has a serious, feasible alternative with which to replace the ACA.

Just one.

Prove me wrong, and back up your oft-repeated assertion with any kind of evidence that there is a genuine interest amongst any Republican to replace the ACA (aka ObamaRomneyCare) with anything.

Sigh... you've beaten me into submission.

I think it was the "morality is malleable" line that did me in.

But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.

This question of legal plunder must be settled once and for all, and there are only three ways to settle it:

The few plunder the many.
Everybody plunders everybody.
Nobody plunders anybody.

We must make our choice among limited plunder, universal plunder, and no plunder. The law can follow only one of these three.

Limited legal plunder: This system prevailed when the right to vote was restricted. One would turn back to this system to prevent the invasion of socialism.

Universal legal plunder: We have been threatened with this system since the franchise was made universal. The newly enfranchised majority has decided to formulate law on the same principle of legal plunder that was used by their predecessors when the vote was limited.

No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic. Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate). [2]

Fredrich Bastiat

It's not a 'challenge', madbolter.

You have said several times that the ACA should be replaced immediately with some other plan, even a SP system.