Fattrad nuked - classic

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List

This thread has been locked

Messages 661 - 680 of total 863 in this topic

<< First | < Previous | Show All | Next > | Last >>

healyje

Trad climber

Portland, Oregon

Feb 15, 2012 - 05:27am PT

'She' is here so much because she is obviously the creation of a retired climber - if they were currently a climber, they wouldn't have the inclination, time or energy to bother.

dirtbag

climber

Feb 15, 2012 - 09:06am PT

I hope fatty and weschrist will rejoin us someday.

John Moosie

climber

Beautiful California

Feb 15, 2012 - 09:36am PT

Truth be told, apogee, our side did not have many players in the first place so we could hardly afford to lose one, let alone two

There are a lot of conservative voices on this forum, but they don't post much to these threads because of the continued hatred spread by people like Fattrad, Skipt, Blue, Fortmental, Dr. F, and others.

Roger Breedlove is a perfect example of a conservative who would post more if wading into the conversation wasn't so disgusting.

Karl Baba

Trad climber

Yosemite, Ca

Feb 15, 2012 - 10:07am PT

as a consolation prize, Fatty get's another sorta "appreciation" thread.

and it's not like some appreciation threads where you know the guy is reading all the posts and needs to comment at some point but when?

Now he's a dope outlaw raggamuffin who can say he was tooled

Peace

Karl

nature

climber

Aridzona for now Denver.... here I come...

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 15, 2012 - 10:24am PT

if i nuked it another one or more would pop up so that seems pointless. at least it's all contained in one place.

and as much as it upsets some to have it on the front page my observation is that when people nuke a thread there is intense outrage. Said outrage would then be directed at me. so i pick the lesser of two poisons.

John Moosie

climber

Beautiful California

Feb 15, 2012 - 10:26am PT

Now he's a dope outlaw raggamuffin who can say he was tooled

Why in the world would you seek to lift up someone who is unrepentant, to try and make their banning seem cool? Don't you see that this just encourages his poor behavior?

Elcapinyoazz

Social climber

Joshua Tree

Feb 15, 2012 - 10:34am PT

This thread needs to die. How about deleting it Nature

How about not clicking on it Sully?
If you don't like the thread, you have the power to solve your problem within your own index finger. No clicky, no problem.

You know, I don't care about snow leopards, present weather conditions on the eastside, bonobos, teaching evolution, or ukele music...but I'm not in those threads asking the author to delete them either.

bvb

Social climber

flagstaff arizona

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:03am PT

Fattrad/Pol Pot 2012!

Endorsed by Jeffrey Dalmer.

The wanna-be one.

WBraun

climber

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:10am PT

You guys are fuking crazy.

Fattrad is gone and you guys are still talking like he's still here.

You guys are trying get LEB to stop talking and at the same time keep talking to her.

INSANE!!!!!!

INSANITY !!!!!

You guys just as soon should all shoot yourselves in the head .....

survival

Big Wall climber

Terrapin Station

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:15am PT

Late comer to the game. Don't think I can read 1100 posts on the topic.

So uh....can someone summarize what the heck happened?

Delhi Dog

climber

Good Question...

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:19am PT

It's a banning/political/LEB dominated/ told you so/don't look and quit whining/blueballs/can't we all get along/f*ck off/ appreciation thread.

more or less
cheers

survival

Big Wall climber

Terrapin Station

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:26am PT

Thanks locker and DD.

But what prompted the banning that begot all this love?

Reilly

Mountain climber

The Other Monrovia- CA

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:26am PT

Survival, Fattie and Skipt were banned. The good news is Klimmer is back.
Oh, and Tami is instituting a bonobo-based conflict resolution therapy clinic for us.

ps
Dr F is collecting the bail money.

John Moosie

climber

Beautiful California

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:35am PT

Hey Survival. I think Chris just had enough. After the superbowl, there was a thread started by Chris about a climber who did some tricks on a slack line during the halftime performance. It was wild.

Fattie
Fortmental
Weschrist
and Dadood

crapped all over that thread. That got them banned. Then someone reminded Chris about the post Skipt made to Jstan and that got Skipt banned.

Then Chris made a video about trying to maintain the signal to noise ratio. If you post more crap then good, then plan on being shown the door.

Karl Baba

Trad climber

Yosemite, Ca

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:37am PT

Moosie wrote

Why in the world would you seek to lift up someone who is unrepentant, to try and make their banning seem cool? Don't you see that this just encourages his poor behavior?

I'm against a lot of what Fatty Believes but I'm not against Fatty. He's paying for his own behavior so he doesn't need a additional kick from me.

I think it's positive that Fatty shared his view in the political discussions. People should know that view is out there and how noble/ignoble it is

Peace

Karl

monolith

climber

albany,ca

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:37am PT

Fatty graced one of CMac's threads in his usual style and CMac gave him a lifetime achievement award. Skipt, not wanting to be upstaged, unloaded a nastygram on JStan, and was ejected from the playing field.

John Moosie

climber

Beautiful California

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:39am PT

He's paying for his own behavior so he doesn't need a additional kick from me.

So instead you glorify his scofflaw behavior by trying to make his banning somehow seem cool. It is no wonder we never get rid of that kind of behavior on this planet.

apogee

climber

Feb 15, 2012 - 11:40am PT

Moosie, those facts are probably largely true, but the way you've presented them makes it sound like that was a singular event, and CMac's action was simply retribution in nature.

Those posts were probably the straw that broke the back...those 4 posters had significant histories of negativity in their postings. (Some of which were quite prolific.) It's not about a singular event...it's about a pattern of behavior.