Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 661 - 680 of total 1354 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 08:02pm PT
I googled

oopsie

That puts you in Group One Klimmer. Stupid, ignorant, naïve, brainless, idiot, school teachers.

Did you read it. if you did makes all your arguements wrong on WTC.

Still did not answer WHAT and WHY Stupid

And you are a teacher, elemantary? What grade 2-3?




Lots,


I already knew the answer, we all do. But for your understanding I gave you a great resource that indeed shows you that concrete doesn't burn and can take extremely high temps. and behaves like a ceramic. It doesn't conduct heat very well, hence its insulation like properties. Concrete is an insulator vs. a conductor. It doesn't conduct heat or electricity well at all because concrete = insulator.

We already know this. The WTC towers and all the concrete were pulverized by explosives. Many videos of the tower collapse show this very well.


The video that the debunkers don't want you to see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh7WbBGnMhI&feature=related

WTC buildings were turned to dust as they fell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enUOZZwxbRw&feature=fvwrel




You really can't let go of insults and belittling can you? Its the sign of a weak mind.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 08:06pm PT
Pulverized concrete again.

Is this the Comedy Central Channel?

Silent explosives turned the building to dust.

I know what's coming up next from Klimmer. Wait for it....







































































We have numerous reports of explosions!!!! (That no one recorded as the buildings fell)

Come on Klimmer, post that Naudet brothers video with the faked audio you posted before with the little bangs as the tower collapsed.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 08:54pm PT
Mono,

We have William Rodriguez's testimony of explosives going off prior to the jet impact in the basement of one of the towers, and a surviving victim that had his skin burned off as a result. His testimony is irrefutable.

Seismic data also verifies these explosions since they were in the basements and directly tied into the foundation bedrock.

The other tower had explosives going off in the basement also. There is testimony for that out there in addition.

There are hundreds perhaps thousands of eye-witness testimony from first responders that have been taken and recorded were they verify the truth of explosives going off, and some were even blown and thrown as a result.

Then we have all the MSM that also indicates explosives when they first reported. These aired just once and then not again. Yet people have recorded these MSM segments and have put them up on youtube.

Then we have an incredible amount of video available where we all witnessed the explosives pulverizing the towers so that they could fall at near free-fall acceleration with very little to no resistance from below, right into their own footprints. Not once, but 3 times!


There is a plethora of evidence of explosives.

Then there is the physical dust from 9-11 with Super Nano-thermite. It is what it is. It's empirical science that can't be denied. It isn't paint. Read the study in detail. I've posted all of this before.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:00pm PT
Those "explosions" didn't pulverize the building now did they silly boy?

The victim Rodriguez helped was burned from the fireball in the elevator shaft. He had burns, not impact wounds.

Its the same thing over and over. You claim the building was pulvarized, then point to alleged sounds that didn't happen during the collapse.

Come on, dude, explosions large enough to pulvarize a building (even standard demolitions don't do that and they are loud) would be so loud, they would be heard throughout Manhattan.

Produce the audio or STFU!
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:13pm PT
Hilarious, they collapsed into their own footprints, but still damaged and destroyed more then 20 buildings.

Did the rubble just bounce out Klimmer?

Do you think the buildings had to tip over to be a natural collapse?
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:21pm PT
Mono,

I feel sorry for you. You throw out pure rubbish and lies and sadly you even believe them. Man are you deceived.




Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU&feature=related

"So many 9/11 witnesses or people who would seem to have knowledge of the cover up have been mysteriously dying. This all can't be a coincidence."

monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:24pm PT
Did I lie in the last 2 posts? Please elaborate.

Maybe you can also explain how Hush-A-Boom(tm) bombs work?
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:33pm PT
Mono,

I answered you already. You are the one dismissing all the testimony with the wave of your hand.

You can't do that. It's still there.



We have William Rodriguez's testimony of explosives going off prior to the jet impact in the basement of one of the towers, and a surviving victim that had his skin burned off as a result. His testimony is irrefutable.

Seismic data also verifies these explosions since they were in the basements and directly tied into the foundation bedrock.

The other tower had explosives going off in the basement also. There is testimony for that out there in addition.

There are hundreds perhaps thousands of eye-witness testimony from first responders that have been taken and recorded were they verify the truth of explosives going off, and some were even blown and thrown as a result.

Then we have all the MSM that also indicates explosives when they first reported. These aired just once and then not again. Yet people have recorded these MSM segments and have put them up on youtube.

Then we have an incredible amount of video available where we all witnessed the explosives pulverizing the towers so that they could fall at near free-fall acceleration with very little to no resistance from below, right into their own footprints. Not once, but 3 times!


There is a plethora of evidence of explosives.

Then there is the physical dust from 9-11 with Super Nano-thermite. It is what it is. It's empirical science that can't be denied. It isn't paint. Read the study in detail. I've posted all of this before.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:34pm PT
We have William Rodriguez's testimony of explosives going off prior to the jet impact in the basement of one of the towers, and a surviving victim that had his skin burned off as a result. His testimony is irrefutable.

Damn you are not very bright. That's before the collapse. How can explosions before the collapse pulvarize the building?

The other tower had explosives going off in the basement also. There is testimony for that out there in addition.

And these basement explosions are pulvarizing the buildings as they collapsed from the impact point?

And where's that audio Klimmer? One of the most recorded events in history and no audio of the bombs 'pulvarizing' the building?

Try to focus Klimmer, we are talking about the buildings being 'pulvarized' and 'turned to dust' during the collapse as you claimed.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:44pm PT
Damn you are not very bright. That's before the collapse. How can explosions before the collapse pulverize the building.


No, actually very bright. You're just throwing out stupid ad hominem attacks and deceit. The bottom basement explosives didn't pulverize the towers and you know this. They had another purpose and you know this also.

You know as well as everyone by this time what the explosives in the basement just immediately prior to the jets impacting indicates, and its purpose, and what it all means.

Many sites interested in the truth go into why this occurred.

I'm tired of going over the same things, over and over again with you. I only do so just in-case someone else is paying attention and will benefit. You certainly don't.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:45pm PT
Get some help Klimmer. You have problems with 'before', 'during' and 'after'. You tend to merge them all together.

I have no idea what the basement bombs were doing Klimmer, please elaborate.

Remember, the basement truck bombing was massive, yet did little structural damage as the tower was not closed long.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:47pm PT
Google is your friend Mono.

Use it if you truly are interested in knowing.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:49pm PT
That's funny you won't tell us.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:55pm PT
We have numerous reports of explosions!!!! (That no one recorded as the buildings fell)

Come on Klimmer, post that Naudet brothers video with the faked audio you posted before with the little bangs as the tower collapsed.


The level of denial is almost reaching a peak.

Riley, I have no idea who are Harriet and Jones. But if you have something to say about the video, why not say it?


Anyway, these are the real deal. If you watch only two videos, watch these. If you still believe that there's nothing fishy going on, then we must agree to disagree.


The Day The Illuminati Pushed Their Luck To Far..


9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!


These prove that NIST lied about why they did not test for explosives, and it gives us a damn good reason why we should test for explosives.
monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 09:59pm PT
Riley, I have no idea who are Harriet and Jones.

Dang K-man, you have no idea who Jones is, the originator of your beloved Thermite theory?

Seriously?

Whoa..
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 5, 2011 - 10:10pm PT
Super Nano-thermite.

WOW!
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Sep 5, 2011 - 10:23pm PT
Oh, I thought the chemist from Copenhagen was the one who believed explosions in the buildings was the cause of their collapse.

I guess there's a LOT of folks who witnessed explosions before the buildings collapsed, and a LOT of folks who know scientifically that the buildings could not collapse they way they did without explosives.

However, after watching that video that Klimmer put up about the mysterious deaths of folks with first-hand knowledge of events, well I think I know enough.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 10:25pm PT
Yes . . .



Nano-Thermite explosions in dust at WTC 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUemun0iy_s

Nano-Thermite explosions in dust at WTC 7 (part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCyWibJT56w&feature=related



A team of nine scientists have unearthed startling data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on 9/11. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of active thermitic material, or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.

Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The active thermitic material discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as nano-structured super-thermite.

Nano-laminate-based ignitors
United States Patent Application 20040060625

Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Assistant Laboratory, Counsel Ann Lee M. (Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94551, US)

The invention claimed is:

1. A composition comprising: an energetic multilayer structure coated with an energetic booster material.

2. The composition recited in claim 1, wherein said composition is ignitable by mechanical stimuli.

3. The composition recited in claim 1, wherein said composition is ignitable by electrical energy.

4. The composition recited in claim 1, wherein said composition is ignitable by a laser.

5. The composition recited in claim 1, wherein said composition has an area ranging from 10−2 m2 to 102 m2.

6. The composition recited in claim 1, wherein said energetic booster material comprises an intimate mixture of at least one oxidizer(s) and at least one fuel, wherein at least one of the critical dimensions (length, height, width) of at least one of the constituents is less than 100 nm and at least one of the components of the energetic materials was derived via sol-gel methods.





An overview of the scientific paper . . .

Explosives Found in
World Trade Center Dust
Scientists Discover Both Residues
And Unignited Fragments
Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics
In Debris From the Twin Towers
by
Jim Hoffman
Version 1.00, April 3, 2009

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html

monolith

climber
Sep 5, 2011 - 10:25pm PT
Yep, your next K-man. You are quite the threat to the Truth.

Nano-Thermite is old news Klimmer.

We want to hear about Super Nano-Thermite.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Sep 5, 2011 - 10:29pm PT
Yep, your next K-man. You are quite the threat to the Truth.




Mono,

Whether you are kidding or not Mono, that is really uncalled for.

Jokes like this should kick you off ST.
Or was it a joke?





Edit:

Listen to Dr. Steven Jones. That is what he calls it because of its explosive reaction.
Messages 661 - 680 of total 1354 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta