Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 6581 - 6600 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
dirtbag

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 09:30am PT
Chief Cherry Picker.

dirtbag

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 09:44am PT
4. Discussion

Of note is the large proportion of abstracts that state no position on AGW. This result is expected in consensus situations where scientists '...generally focus their discussions on questions that are still disputed or unanswered rather than on matters about which everyone agrees' (Oreskes 2007, p 72). This explanation is also consistent with a description of consensus as a 'spiral trajectory' in which 'initially intense contestation generates rapid settlement and induces a spiral of new questions' (Shwed and Bearman 2010); the fundamental science of AGW is no longer controversial among the publishing science community and the remaining debate in the field has moved to other topics. This is supported by the fact that more than half of the self-rated endorsement papers did not express a position on AGW in their abstracts.


From that same source, Chief Dumbass.

monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 10:20am PT
...the fundamental science of AGW is no longer controversial among the publishing science community and the remaining debate in the field has moved to other topics. This is supported by the fact that more than half of the self-rated endorsement papers did not express a position on AGW in their abstracts.

[The Chief]Does NOT indicate a consensus nor any type of agreement. Unless you and the others wish to think it does. Just another perfect example of complete manipulation of the verbiage to do just as Steve Schneider indicated must be done back in 1989 in order to fool and deceive idiots as yourself (BAGLADY) in believing the manipulated propaganda bullshet and jump onboard the train of AGW socialistic utopian ideology.

The Chief has reading comprehension issues.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 10:30am PT
More than half of the abstracts that we rated as 'No Position' or 'Undecided' were rated 'Endorse AGW' by the paper's authors.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 11:46am PT
Most cancers are related to lifestyle choices. Poor diet, smoking, drinking, etc.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 03:26pm PT
Asteroid extinction events happen on the order of every tens of millions of years Chief.

That's no reason to tolerate something we can prevent in the next few hundreds of years.

Please keep spouting your incoherent babble, it's mildly entertaining.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 21, 2013 - 03:36pm PT
monolith++

I'm sure it helps ed and those that wish to engage him at his nonsense sharpen their wits.

the rest of us - we're just laughing

the chief - you do realize the longer you go on the more hysterical you sound the less anyone will actually take your side of the story seriously. You're trying to put forth an argument against AGW yet the only thing you are accomplishing is making your self look more extreme and nutty.

Anyone besides rong and rick care to disagree with me?
dirtbag

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 05:11pm PT
Hey Chief loudmouth,


Did you even bother to read the article's explanation regarding the 32%, where it goes on to explain that the number isn't higher because the other 67% of scientists probably don't dispute it?

Of course you didn't.

All you ever do cherry pick information that supports your basically indefensible theses, scream loudly and use lots of bold font and photos to make your silly point, remain ignorant of the science and math, insult those who patiently try to teach you something as being zealots (and worse), then change the subject to Egypt, cancer or whatever else you think of.

Newsflash Popeye: that sheet don't work with civilians.

So go gobble a donkey dong.
AndyMan

Sport climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 05:15pm PT
Will true believers in the climate scam please tell us in your own words, exactly what is the EVIDENCE that man has caused any of the warming since the Little Ice Age ... the warming that stopped 2 decades ago ...

monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 05:17pm PT
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 21, 2013 - 05:42pm PT
monolith++
dirtbag

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 05:43pm PT
He could also spend half a minute googling and find countless articles from credible sources, if he was truly interested (which he is not).
AndyMan

Sport climber
CA
Aug 21, 2013 - 06:15pm PT
Mann's "hockey stick" is discredited. It was based primarily on one tree in the Urals, then Mann "hides" data that shows cooling after 1960 and replaces it with Hadcrut3 data. He has been fighting fraud cases in court. Regardless, warming provides zero evidence that man has caused it.

What is the EVIDENCE that MAN has caused any of the warming since the Little Ice Age ... the warming that STOPPED 2 decades ago ...

monolith

climber
SF bay area
Aug 21, 2013 - 06:18pm PT
Not just Mann, the reconstructions have been repeated by others including Marquette.

Global warming stopped 20 years ago? You are quite the joker. Really, 1993?

We started emitting considerable C02 starting in the 19th century.


If you want to deny the spike in temperature, go ahead. You just look like a denier.

And some more basic refreshers for you.


dirtbag

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 06:31pm PT
Andyman is probably just another chief avatar. He did that a couple of months ago.

Notice how chief is currently responding to other threads right now, meaning, he is online, and andyman is responding to this one?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 21, 2013 - 06:35pm PT
If Andyman is The Chief it just goes to show how weak The Chief and his denier stance is. And it goes to show he knows it. That's be best part.

A better man would realize that in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are wrong and admit it. Or... you could create a new avatar to help divert the fact that you were fooled.

If you have to resort to creating a new avatar to not look like more of a fool you're really hurting.
tooth

Trad climber
B.C.
Aug 21, 2013 - 08:42pm PT
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols

Aug 21, 2013 - 05:14pm PT
There are so many stupid idiots in America

So Dr. Steve Schneider is also one of them stupid idiots. Got that as well.

THINKPROGRESS????? A "credible source"????

"“Best Liberal Blog” in the 2006"


Far worse totally bias liberal propaganda source than the Daily Kos.


Another pure example how none of this has to do with the environment. Nothing. Has everything to do with a political ideology. That is per your source, "THINKPROGRESS".
WBraun

climber

Aug 21, 2013 - 05:17pm PT
Bruce Kay STFU you stupid moron.

By posting that link proves you are stupider than all stupidity.

Go fuk yourself you stupid aszhole ......





I was wondering how Syria was allowed to gas their own people - so I wandered over to StupidTopo to see how governments can use stupid ideas to divide 'we the people' to the point that they could care less about killing their fellow citizens as long as they don't agree on something. Gore is likening deniers on this topic to all sorts of horrible people - how far can you guys take this?

How does a government get to kill so many people with other people who live in that country? Well, you can't do it if they love each other. Bunch of whiney little kids in a playground are easy to make fight each other though. Of course Werner is above all that stupid American bickering though.


DIVIDE AND CONQUOR!
WBraun

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 08:58pm PT
I was wondering how Syria was allowed to gas their own people


Never was Syria.

You've been totally stupidly fallen under the lies of the US main stream media.

Do some real research instead of just spouting out junk like this.
tooth

Trad climber
B.C.
Aug 21, 2013 - 09:22pm PT
Never was Syria.

You've been totally stupidly fallen under the lies of the US main stream media.

Do some real research instead of just spouting out junk like this.

I'll honor your 'inside' knowledge superceeding your own media and your distrust for it and can use one of a million other examples of history of the same thing. The principle remains the same. Fight and bicker like children, or be united, strong and free.
WBraun

climber
Aug 21, 2013 - 09:32pm PT
Tooth -- "Fight and bicker like children, or be united, strong and free."

I agree with you.

The divide and conquer method is also not the only method being used right now in our world.

There's some seriously sick devious methods being used on the populace without their awareness these days.

Also I don't believe one iota that Ed would knowingly consider any involvement in the advancement of any WMD against mankind.

It's just not him ......
Messages 6581 - 6600 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta