Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Even more insults.
edit: cool post number 1000!
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
I am looking for the correct analysis that include explosives, hologram planes, aliens, missiles or whatever you guys believe in.
From your first post raymond. Convince me you're not the one who started with the insults.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Can you show me the insult in that sentence? The only thing I did was being including in regard to truthers. You are free to prove that no aliens or holograms is needed to explain what happened on 9/11 and Klimmer is free to include as many arks and aliens in his explanation.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Clearly we are dealing with a person of sub-standard intelligence here. Please, don't just take pity on this fellow raymond, try to figure out a way to help him.
More fun:
The only thing I did was being including in regard to truthers.
-- raymond
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Just insults. I guess I need to come to the conclusion that K-man is a genius after his very good posts.
So the truthers obviously have no reason to came up with any reasonable explanations of what happened 9/11 but they only need to "spot errors" and complain about other peoples explanations.
So how do explosions every 15-20 minutes say anything meaningful about explosives in the buildings?
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 5, 2011 - 02:50pm PT
|
Raymond -- "Why don't you are some other of the many experts do that analysis?"
This sentience: >> Why don't you are some
Please try and proof read before you hit the "Post this reply"
Next many experts on both side of the fence are doing that.
How would any disagreement even occur if there was only one side doing any analysis?
This is why I said you have no brain.
Now go use your brain .....
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
This sentience: >> Why don't you are some
Please try and proof read before you hit the "Post this reply"
Sorry.
Next many experts on both side of the fence are doing that.
And you still can't show any detailed analysis from your side?
How would any disagreement even occur if there was only one side doing any analysis?
You are hilarious. You believe that analysis* is necessary from both sides for a disagreement to occur?
* analysis instead of just talking bullshit about things they are clueless about.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 5, 2011 - 03:13pm PT
|
Again you have no brain.
Not only no brain but stupid too ......
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 5, 2011 - 03:35pm PT
|
You're an insult to all sides.
You even unknowingly insult yourself .....
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
San Diego
|
|
Gentlemen, stay focused.
Stop the personal insults, it's childish.
Once again . . .
What do we know:
Absolute fore knowledge that an attack was going to be done and on the WTC towers. We knew they were going to use aircraft to do so.
From before . . .
They "TPTB" knew what was going to happen and they used it to their advantage to accomplish what they wanted: LIHOP
Also they "TPTB" knew what they had to do to make it happen: MIHOP
**Eric Rockefeller revealed to Aaron Russo what the NWO wants and that something big was going to happen to be the pretext to go war and invade Afghanistan and Iraq before 9-11-2001.
**Lt. Mike Vreeland from the Pentagon revealed while jailed in Canada that 9-11-2001 would occur and what the events would be. He wrote this down and sealed it in an envelope and gave it to the Canadian authorities. They opened it after 9-11-2001 occurred. This has been verified in Canadian court.
**Ex CIA Asset Susan Lindauer reveals that US intelligence knew very specifically that the WTC towers would be attacked by aircraft before 9-11-2001 and she shares all the specific details and more. She was held in prison for 5 years by our US government on a Texas military base in attempts to silence her.
All of this verifies LIHOP and MIHOP.
Eric Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA&feature=related
A White Knight Talking Backwards
SPY CASE IN CANADIAN COURTS SUGGESTS US NAVAL OFFICER HAD FOREKNOWLEDGE OF 9-11
by Michael C. Ruppert, Author of Crossing The Rubicon
http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/01_25_02_revised_012802_vreeland.html
http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/01_28_02_vreeland.jpg
Ex CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blows the whistle on 911 myth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d1OW7b-oug
Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq [Paperback]
Susan Lindauer (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Prejudice-Terrifying-Story-Patriot/dp/1453642757
Extreme Prejudice / Clear Evidence Of 9/11 Cover Up
By Allen L Roland (about the author)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Extreme-Prejudice--Clear-by-Allen-L-Roland-110105-991.html
http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/
"Spies Knew"
Cont. on what we know:
Richard Clarke admits that the CIA purposefully withheld information from other intelligence agencies concerning all involved in the 9-11-2001 plot involving "terrorists." They had a great amount of information/intelligence that they purposefully did not share with other agencies.
Considerable means, motive, and opportunity evidence exists that 9-11-2001 was planned and used as a pretext for endless war on "Terror," war-profiteering, and to radically weaken or eradicate our Constitution and our Civil Rights. Remember, PNAC needed "A New Pearl Harbor" to do and to achieve what they have been able to do since 9-11-2001.
If you can't believe that our government can do this, look at the history of false-flags that the US government has carried out. Read and know the details of "Operation Northwoods" to know this truth. In that plan they discussed in detail using false-flag hijackings, using remote aircraft, and killing of our own citizens/soldiers/people, and much more immoral and heinous crimes to take the US into war against Cuba.
Many federal agencies practiced emergency procedures and scenarios for just such a large scale terrorist attack such as 9-11.
Even the Pentagon practiced wargames with aircraft attacking the Pentagon prior to 9-11-2001.
We have Condi et al. saying "we couldn't imagine they would use aircraft as missiles." That is 100% USDA Bull Dung.
We also know that there where many wargames on 9-11-2001, 15+ or more.
Evidence that NORAD was given a stand down order after the attacks on 9-11-2001 began.
Many physical evidences show that the laws of Physics were suspended on 9-11-2001 if the OCT is held-up as true as told in the 9-11 Commission Report, for all 3 WTC towers to fall as they did due only to the 2 aircrafts slamming into them.
An incredible amount of physical evidence and eye-witness reports are ignored concerning demolition of all 3 WTC towers.
The absolute physical evidence of nano-superthermite found in the dust of all 3 WTC towers.
The physical evidence fits the fact that something other than a 757 slams into the Pentagon. The evidence that explosives were used is considerable.
The means, motive, and opportunity, and the physical evidence for LIHOP and MIHOP is fairly overwhelming. The OCT has been invalidated time and time again.
A new thorough and complete investigation of 9-11-2001 by an open and honest international community or commission must be done.
Re-investigate 9-11 now.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
Jolly thinks we'll go for thermite in the exterior columns, for all to see burning away. Dang the NWO is dumb.
No NWO risk manager would do something like that when he had already implicated Islamic Jihadists flying suicide missions. The buildings didn't need to collapse, silly boys.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
What did the truthers do before youtube existed?
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
San Diego
|
|
You have to ask the question why was the normal NORAD procedures changed a few months before 9-11-01?
"The document revoked the default standing orders to shoot down errant or hijacked aircraft and instructed them instead to stand down until they were given orders by the President, Vice President or Secretary of Defense."
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/260607_mineta.html
Norman Mineta made it clear to reporters-- who verified his quotes in written text alongside him-- that Mineta was indeed talking about a stand down order not to shoot down hijacked aircraft headed for the Pentagon.
After no shoot down took place, it became clear that Cheney intended to keep NORAD fighter jets from responding-- evidence that Cheney is guilty of treason, not negligence for allowing the Pentagon to be hit.
(Click each document for a larger image)
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/260607_docu_1.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/260607_docu3-a.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/260607_docu2.jpg
The idea that "the order still stands" matches up with a change in NORAD and Pentagon orders-- issued on June 1, 2001, only months before 9/11. The document revoked the default standing orders to shoot down errant or hijacked aircraft and instructed them instead to stand down until they were given orders by the President, Vice President or Secretary of Defense.
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
San Diego
|
|
Why the slam on youtube?
Everyone uses it as a free place to post videos.
Even the government at times uses youtube to post videos.
|
|
monolith
climber
|
|
No Warbler, Truthers gave themselves that label a long time ago. Seriously, they called themselves Truthers. Some used lower case, some used upper case. I'm happy to use the word they use to describe themselves.
Don't ya wanna know the Truth?
And as Raymond points out below, they still use it. Klimmer uses it as well.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Why the slam on youtube?
Everyone uses it as a free place to post videos.
Even the government at times uses youtube to post videos.
Because all you guys do is posting youtube videos and I think videos is a pretty bad way to get across actual information. Opps I see my own mistake now. Keep posting the videos.
Anyway, not many people is going to look through thousand of hours of videos when they want to find information. Articles and books works much better if it is actually about arguing for something.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Classic, in a Rovian manner, how the skeptics of the official version are dubbed "Truthers", as if seeking truth is something to be ridiculed.
I have used it because I believe for example k-man has used it himself in this thread.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!