Prop. 8 Supporters--YOU SUCK!!!

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List

This thread has been locked

Messages 601 - 620 of total 1091 in this topic

<< First | < Previous | Show All | Next > | Last >>

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:52am PT

A drunk as#@&%e is a drunk as#@&%e and deserves to be beaten regardless.

Any time, Johnson.......

healyje

Trad climber

Portland, Oregon

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:53am PT

Jesus, you'd think it was gay people who had gay people from the sound of conservatives like bluering. I think it must be straight guilt and some sort of a deep and abiding fear one of their kids will end up gay.

apogee

climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:54am PT

You are drunk tonight, aren't you!!??

Dr.Sprock

Boulder climber

I'm James Brown, Bi-atch!

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:54am PT

Prop 8, thats the cannibas bill, right?

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:55am PT

Not really, Apogee.....

apogee

climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:56am PT

OK, then...

Fighting with the wife?

Boss piss you off?

Gene

Social climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:57am PT

Bluey,

But man was meant to consecrate his love for a woman and MATE in holy matrimony. Once consecrated, they would live happily ever after producing children...

A good buddy of mine is a retired Navy Chief Petty Officer. He's in his 70s. Until his heart acted up a year or two ago, he was a pastor here in Modesto.

His wife died about three years ago. Since then he has remarried, to a woman who may be a few years younger than him. I guess, since it is impossible for them to produce children, they don't meet your threshold to marry.

Sad.

g

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 12:58am PT

Yo bleuy...

marriage is not a religious institution.

It was originally, Matt. Give the fags the rights they seem to want, and call it done. No need to call it marriage. Civil unions or whatever...

Mighty Hiker

climber

Vancouver, B.C.

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:00am PT

But man was meant to consecrate his love for a woman and MATE in holy matrimony. Once consecrated, they would live happily ever after producing children...

Which if nothing else shows that bluering is idealistic, if not outright romantic. Sadly or happily, the world doesn't always conform to such ideals.

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:08am PT

You guys think I hate gay people...that's kinda what pisses me off. Kinda like I hate Sharpton, jackson, and Obama, cause I'm a racist. F*#king pisses me off!!!

I, unlike some of you, have ideals and religious beliefs. These people have consistently abused their faith and beliefs. I realize where I fall short in God's eyes and seek to redeem myself. Others seem to piss on that notion...

Yeah, it's religious. And if you don't feel it, fine, I may pray for ya. But that's all I got on this subject.

May God help y'all!!!

Gene

Social climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:08am PT

It [marriage] was originally [a religious institution], Matt.

Bullsh#t. Marriage is and always has been a social and secular contract that can be, but not necessarily be, consecrated by a member of clergy. Who allows the clergy to conduct wedding ceremonies? The freaking government. If a marriage goes South, who unwinds it? The only legal way is through the government.

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:14am PT

It [marriage] was originally [a religious institution], Matt.

But how many times did tribal elders condone the 'homophobic act' of gay marriage???

And why not???

Gene

Social climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:16am PT

Yeah, it's religious.

That's fine and more power to you for your faith. But what does that have to do with the rights of same sex partners (aka, fags to you) with seeking the same rights, privlege, and dignity that you and Mrs. Bluey enjoy? What does that take away from you? These folks want to marry and not have civil unions or domestic partnerships. They want to be just like us.

The horror.

g

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:20am PT

That's what I'm saying, Gene, call it a civil union with all the tax benefits of a marriage. All the other benefits too!

Gene

Social climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:26am PT

Bluey,

Read again, Bro. Same sex couples don't want to have civil unions or domestic partnerships. They want to be married, just like us. They don't want the quality of their love or commitment given a name that differs from straight couples, because their love and commitment is same as enjoyed by straight couples. Get it? Why have separate and parallel systems and names for relationships that are the same?

g

Ghost

climber

A long way from where I started

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:28am PT

You guys think I hate gay people...

You're actually wrong about that. I know you don't hate gays, and I suspect most of the others who have been disagreeing with you know it as well. But you do think gays shouldn't be given the rights straight people have.

Same deal on the plantation. The slave owners didn't hate blacks. But they knew blacks shouldn't have the rights white people had. And they fell back on religion to justify their position, just as you do.

David Knopp

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:29am PT

the solution is so obvious-keep weddings in churches, let the
states only sanction civil unions...

bluering

Trad climber

Aug 11, 2010 - 01:34am PT

Get it? Why have separate and parallel systems and names for relationships that are the same?

No, I don't get it. They are, by definition and sexuality, different. They are not the same. They may have equal rights under the law, but they are different. Different doesn't mean bad or whatever, it's a different type of marital status. To call it the same is an insult to natural marriage between a female and male.

Quit trying to make it normal. It ain't! And I think you fools know this.