Climate Change: Why aren't more people concerned about it?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 601 - 620 of total 2200 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:41pm PT
Well, then, what a fantastic opportunity for business!!

If I were as smart a guy as Trump, and knowing that this is all a false conspiracy, I'd be buying up every low-lying piece of property in the world.

That's what he's doing, right?

Right?


That's where you are going to make your fortuna, too, right? Just take out some second mortgages and buy, buy, buy! the land will be cheap!
Al Barkamps

Social climber
Red Stick
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:41pm PT
..in Alaska some receding glaciers are revealing forests of stumps radio carbon dated to the Medieval Warm period.

hooda thunk that the same mechanism that mills mountains down to dust can leave whole forests untouched! Only in Alaska!
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:44pm PT
You're a frigging idiot Kenny boy. Who can afford beachfront after the likes of Gore, Decaprio,and Obama have bid the price up.
monolith

climber
state of being
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:49pm PT
Greenland loses over 1 trillion tons of ice in 4 years.


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL069666/full
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:51pm PT
^^^^^ Fake news. Lies, lies, lies.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 11, 2016 - 09:52pm PT
your growing ice cap studies never refute a warming planet RS
EdBannister

Mountain climber
13,000 feet
Dec 11, 2016 - 10:23pm PT
Rick Sumner,
they do not want science,
they do not want to hear facts.
they are devoted to their religion, Man Made Global Warming.

It turns out it is the left that denies science...

if not so there would be a discussion without insults or temper.
just the pursuit of truth, but that is not the case.
F

climber
away from the ground
Dec 11, 2016 - 10:30pm PT
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 11, 2016 - 11:26pm PT
the quote I posted was from the American Institute of Physics, for which I included the link.

That is as scientific an organization that you can get, EdBanister.

You might read some of the other articles at the website, it won't hurt you, and you might find that you are the one making absurd statements.

You might also post links to your websites so we can check the details of the things you are posting.

asking rick for references will not get anything, rick has a stack of those papers in a place that is always inconvenient for him to retrieve... that has been his MO from his first post.


rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 11, 2016 - 11:32pm PT
That's a four foot tall stack of stuff Ed.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 11, 2016 - 11:34pm PT
whatever, I hope it burns well...
Dave

Mountain climber
the ANTI-fresno
Dec 12, 2016 - 06:02am PT
I love some of the replies to my solar/ vehicle post. Particularly the truck posts...

My wife's car cost around $25k. I can buy a Tacoma for about that used. So .... why not buy something that can haul bikes, camping stuff, and construction materials?

Also - the flaws in economic analysis and general attitudes of the left.

What's the solar panel seller and installer's margin?
- I don't care and its none of government's business either...


The cost of the cars you've mentioned will increase as manufacturer's will pass-on the 'carbon cost' of production and disposal. And your petrol costs will go up considerably. You have some decisions to make, which need to factor whether you can:

Get a job with a closer commute - No. My choices and reasons for them are none of your business.

Move house to somewhere with less self-drive transit involved. No, See above,

Travel in a lower petrol running vehicle such as a motorbike. F*#k you - try driving 80 miles (each way) to work and back in mountains when its 20 below and snowing on a moped.


Substitute bike riding, walking, and running for driving. See above.


Convince legislators to subsidise your 'business as usual' approach to climate change.

Adapt your house, and the way you use it, to reduce your use of non-renewable electricity and gas. See economic analysis.


Start shopping for things that are less environmentally harmful,will last longer, and will not be to expensive to maintain/repair. Like a 14 year old truck? it was cheap to repair...

If you are over-eating, you will need to stop. Damn.. I have high metabolism....

If you are frivolous with water, you will need to stop. You mean I can't drink 8 glasses of water a day anymore?

If your recreation is too expensive a carbon-polluter, you will need to stop or adapt it. I need to? for you?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 12, 2016 - 07:57am PT
whatever, I hope it burns well...

lol.,.,nice on liner
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 12, 2016 - 08:12am PT
do you understand the reference Pyro?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 12, 2016 - 08:29am PT
Ed Hartouni posted

By contrast CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for centuries. So the gas acts as a "control knob" that sets the level of water vapor

If CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for centuries, what would it take to cause atmospheric CO2 levels to decline? How much would we need to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions to reverse the current trend? Would we need to reduce current emissions by 50%? 90%? How long would it take for A-CO2 to start falling?

I'm not asking for an in-depth explanation. Just a ball park figure.

What I'm wondering about is whether or not dramatic reductions in emissions would result in lowered A-CO2 levels in our lifetimes.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 12, 2016 - 08:38am PT
trapping and injecting atmospheric CO2 into reservoirs in the Earth could help to speed up reduction ET. this technique is used in hydrocarbon reservoir stimulation to sip up the last recoverable dregs of the tarry milkshake and allows some producers to at least claim net carbon neutrality.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 12, 2016 - 09:03am PT
What I'm wondering about is whether or not dramatic reductions in emissions would result in lowered A-CO2 levels in our lifetimes.

I don't believe that we could expect a lower CO2 level in our lifetimes.


However, you can see that increasing plant biomass might be an avenue towards reduction. Unfortunately, one of the human activities responsible for increased CO2 levels is the decrease in that same biomass, the clearing of forests, etc. for agriculture, and the agricultural process of getting rid of the unused portion of the crop (in the least expensive way, burning).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cycle

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation

Between 2000 and 2012, 2.3 million square kilometres (890,000 square miles) of forests around the world were cut down.[11] As a result of deforestation, only 6.2 million square kilometres (2.4 million square miles) remain of the original 16 million square kilometres (6 million square miles) of forest that formerly covered the Earth.[11]
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2016 - 10:21am PT
The earth has "greened" (plant life including trees increasingly encroaching into previous low habitable areas) 12% over the satellite Era. Any legitamate study of deforestation should account for this, increased urban human planted greenery, and tree farms etc in there calculation of forest loss. Not saying it totally makes up for the alleged forest loss cited by Ed above, but it does significantly reduce his dire numbers. Additionally, this hundreds of years of CO2 atmospheric residence time is a bunch of hooey. Recent studies show residence time in the 5-7 year range.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 12, 2016 - 10:38am PT
The earth has "greened" 12% over the satellite Era....plant life including trees increasingly encroaching into previous low habitable areas

Shifting of species and vegetation zones northwards and upwards in elevation has already been observed.

I wonder why they might move north and up?








Source: Agnes and Hufnagel in Applied Ecology said it was so. Seems like a legit source to me. Let's hear why it's not at all trustworthy, RS.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 12, 2016 - 11:24am PT
ed you better save all this data before TRUMP has it erased.
Messages 601 - 620 of total 2200 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta