Guns; which yield more fun per $

Dec 24, 2011 - 07:49pm PT
Ive read an analysis that said the mechanism of the mini doesn't scale well to a full on assault weapon. Both the barrel and the mechanism interact in such a way as to just not liking the being accurate once used with much heavier rounds, or going full auto. Its been tried over n over, and its taking a good gun and making it a bad one.

Its not for war, its for survival or dinner. Or Varmits.

But a fine light weight varmint gun with delusions of deer. And what do you need more of nowadays? An SKS is likely better n a AK-47 all be told, but how much dinner they leave on the bone after they are done shooting them?



One bullet one kill presupposes a number of targets present. But really, its valid over spray and pray, or hunters woulda always been doing much better since machine guns came out, which they ain't. The great story about the swiss marksmen being asked about facing troops being multiples of theirs, the response being to "each shoot twice"?



They say single shot muzzleloaders wiped out the buffalo that covered the plains.


Whats the rush?



I don't care its not a war tool, I ain't going to war. If I DO suddenly find some impossible desperate need to go to some war and need a better war weapon, I expect I shall kill someone with an appropriate weapon, and use his. I ain't unarmed, I just ain't got war toys.

Didn't the Allies drop cheap, tiny stamped tin single shot pistols with ten rounds each in packages over occupied lines? They had little pictures on them of how to turn them into much more powerful weapons. Go shoot a German Soldier in the back of the head, and take his....

It was reportedly a successful strategy in some hands.



Varmit rifles. It ain,t an assault rifle, its a varmit gun, and I got packs of wolves in Idaho, screw you all, I got reasonable cause now, we all do. Or soon will.

Reintroduce that sabre tooth cat Ron was yammering about, in cali. If I got to lose 70% of the deer and elk herds n Idaho over a ten year period, we might as well have something that can indescriminatedely eat Federal Wildlife Officers as soon as moose... Too many calis is a distinct possibility and we could use something that could eat them, too. Other than each other... They do need a LOT of wolves.



I think Central Park needs onea them cat populations to balance out the over-population issues there with the local human animals, too. The locals campaign to eliminate crinimals seems to be working better than expected, and that has impacted the Urban Survival Rates of Homies, considerable.

Maybe some federally protected wolves. Trained like monkeys with guns to attack gangbangers in inner city ghettos, filching the wires out of the street like animals... Kali got 25% unemployment in minority communities.

How many times you got to shoot someone before they stop stealing a TV? The barrel just doesn't get that hot shooting rabbits. Muzzle brake might be nice... but even if its zombies, we just ain't got as many candidates as Kali. I seriously doubt I would ever get to see more than one or two. You guys population just makes all the scenerios so different. "Swab my barrel, Catherine, before I start cooking off my rounds..."


I think they aught to issue mini-14s to grandmothers after passing a serious percision shooting course. You'd treat granny a little nicer then, by God.

I personally fear no man if I can make it to my car. I got a Hillbilly Brand Trunk Monkey and no better trunk monkey is made. Give them Hell, Trunk Monkey.