Is Religion Doing More Harm Than Good These Days?(OT)

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 581 - 600 of total 1050 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
MikeL

Social climber
Southern Arizona
Jun 16, 2017 - 07:49am PT
August West: But they tend to do things like want to replace the teaching of evolution in schools with some crap like intelligent design or elect politicians hostile to gay rights or make abortion illegal.


Fat Dad: I don't tell people what they should believe so, conversely, I dislike people telling me what I supposedly think or feel or know about the subject.

Both of you seem to have the same complaint.

Rights versus culture.

Both generate ideologies.

Should there be inalienable rights? Do communities get to establish their own beliefs, norms, and behaviors? Should a majority rule?

One might think that we could find some resolution if we could only have a dialogue about the deeper issues. But I suspect that is near-sighted. There is a conundrum about such issues. When looked closely at such things, one will often find the two diametrically opposing views contained in the arguments on both sides. For example, communities establish rights to membership, and any generation of rights comes from the deliberations of a community. Stipulating any prioritization about rights and community result from a social construction . . . again, a community decision.

The more fragmented people become, the more they war with each other, enlisting claims of moral superiority and enlightened intelligence.

These are issues debated by political philosophers for millennia. It seems there are no final solutions, just expedient arrangements for the sake of momentary peace.

There doesn’t seem to be any right or wrong, and that can be infuriating.

It would seem that one must get beyond right and wrong.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:12am PT
Craig,
Is there anything that you rely upon that has come to you by a second account? Have you talked to or listened to those who have had the direct experiences of all the many beliefs that you hold to be credible / true?
Yes there is plenty I take from second account reports

but if smells like BS, then I check it out further
and if it turns out to be wrong, then I reject it.

And the whole Jesus thing smells to high heaven, not only is it second accounts, it was probably changed to add mystical elements and the magnitude of the Son of God identity in later Versions of the second hand accounts

Everything has changed since biblical times
including what was written in the bible

Socrates and Aristotle had some great ideas, some are still valid, others have been found to not be true, I don't need to stick to a flat earth because it was written down is some book that should be questioned.

If you use the bible as a work of fiction, I think it would be better appreciated.

Most of Jesus' teaching are the same as any other spiritual liberal philosopher of the time.
They (years after the death of Jesus) just lumped all the good pagan stuff together and put a face on it, Jesus.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:34am PT
Craig, (1) you do realize you're a "modern" and MikeL is a "post-modernist" - (2) the latter whose main purpose - besides arguing pretty much any point made in terms of its antipode - is to level, that is, zero out, every interpretation or value (system). You don't have to feed it, you can find a more worthy recipient than post-modernism bs (eg. free will, peak oil, climate change, automation, dangers of future AI or VR, etc).

August West, you're a breath of fresh air. Keep it up.
Bushman

climber
The state of quantum flux
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:39am PT
Freedom from Religion

Freedom from religion is a right I empower myself with and exercise. The repression of religion imposed on me in early childhood almost turned me into a militant anarchist, opposed to a religion and government steeped in racism, sexism, and other abuse.

Luckily my wife and kids have civilized me some, and life experience has helped to temper the rage I carried for so many years against the Protestant church and the southern evangelist guilt/reward based fire and brimstone teachings I was exposed to in the vulnerable lamb state of my youth.

Sure, the religious based arts, music, philosophies, and other disciplines of our civilization have their benefits and beauty, but the oppression of free thought and human rights, and the stifling of scientific advancements by the arbiters of religious views far outweigh the need to remain bound by old world theologies.

Believe what you would but I would have none of this god you speak of. No political leader in this country who professes atheism will be elected by the electorate because of the narrow mindedness of religious peoples in our nation. This is evidence that there is no war on religion in our society. It is still balanced in the other direction.

-bushman
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:46am PT
August West, you're a breath of fresh air. Keep it up.

You too, Bob. I just wish you'd give as much attn to the criticism of fundamentalist Islam as you do fundamentalist Christianity. It's true, this is America, American culture, American sociopolitics and fundamentalist Christianity is the greater influence here. But there is also the global perspective, we are globalizing, and taking on that perspective is not that much more challenging. There are umpteen millions in the world like us (women to public intellectuals) having moved beyond fundamentalist theology, who presently suffer under the oppression of 7th century Islamic conservatism. Their voices need our support, in other words our global international support, one way or another too. Just a thought.

It's vitally important to distinguish Muslims (people) from Islam esp Islamism (ideas, systems of ideas), the latter needing pushback and constructive critique from all sides so it can mature beyond its medieval belief.

Unf, this distinction is largely lost (so far) on the general public. No doubt due in large part to the mentalities of the far right and far left.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:50am PT
My answer was directed to Fat Dad
MikeL. just provided the launching board

Fruity
I whole heartily endorse the liberalization of Islam, but there is nothing I can do you bring this about, that's their fight, not mine.

I have no interest in gang piling on them at this time when they are under such right wing pressure of bigotry, hate and misunderstanding.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jun 16, 2017 - 08:52am PT
Fine. But maybe you got the points? :)

...


Sarah Haider. Here's a 21st century hero. If she ever visited Pakistan, she'd be in REAL danger of getting her head cut off. Imagine that.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0plC24YuoJk

"Islamism and the Necessity of Liberal Critique"

...
I have no interest in gang piling on them at this time when they are under such right wing pressure of bigotry, hate and misunderstanding.

"Them"? Them means people. In this case, obviously Muslims. Then, No, I guess you don't get a main point of afore post - the distinction between people (muslims) and ideas (Islamic, Islamist).

With all due respect, in at least this area, you've got some intellectual/spiritual growing to do.

...

Aughh, just lost a whole paragraph that wouldn't upload for some reason. So........ forget it. Have a good one.
MikeL

Social climber
Southern Arizona
Jun 16, 2017 - 12:37pm PT
HFCS: MikeL is a "post-modernist" - (2) the latter whose main purpose - besides arguing pretty much any point made in terms of its antipode - is to level, that is, zero out, every interpretation or value (system).


That’s an interpretation, and perhaps a reasonable one . . . except for the part of my supposed “main purpose.” I don’t seem to have one. (Is that a good thing or a bad thing?)

Your main purpose?
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Jun 16, 2017 - 12:54pm PT
I wouldn't be so concerned about what they believe if they didn't act upon those beliefs. But they tend to do things like want to replace the teaching of evolution in schools with some crap like intelligent design or elect politicians hostile to gay rights or make abortion illegal.

And even with that, delusion is still a bad thing.

If society has convinced somebody that they are, and should be, a second class citizen and that's all right and proper ....

Do you just shrug and say they are entitled to their belief?
No, that's clearly the opposite of what I was saying. Belief and action, particularly political action, are different things. While it might be true that we want to act in accordance with our beliefs, forcing others to act in compliance with your own beliefs is contrary to respecting others' belief and the right to live by those beliefs. I am disgusted by some religious groups (e.g., Evangelical Christians) who want to conform society to their own beliefs. I recall seeing a pastor of a large, well regarded church claim that laws that permit gays to marry, etc., is a personal attack on their values. They strike me as a scary, insecure bunch. I don't want overgeneralize but that denomination has certainly become far more politically active over the past 20 yrs. and are driving in part some of the hard core conservative agenda. They decry the prospect of Sharia law in the U.S. (like that would ever be deemed constitutional) but seem to want their own version of it since we are a "Christian Nation". But I disgress...
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Jun 16, 2017 - 01:09pm PT
Yes there is plenty I take from second account reports

but if smells like BS, then I check it out further
and if it turns out to be wrong, then I reject it.

And the whole Jesus thing smells to high heaven, not only is it second accounts, it was probably changed to add mystical elements and the magnitude of the Son of God identity in later Versions of the second hand accounts

Everything has changed since biblical times
including what was written in the bible
Craig,
Keep in mind that there are a whole series of gnostic gospels, which have been rejected as inauthentic, despite being contemporaneous, so it's not as if they just bough the stuff wholesale without much scrutiny. We are talking about probably the single most scrutinized, discussed writings ever, by far. You say it doesn't pass the smell test and that's fine; different people have different senses of smell. However, you seem to presume that it was changed or that mystical elements were "probably" added, but you don't provide any cites to support your hunches. Bottom line, you can believe what you want. You gotta do what works for you. I'm just curious whether you're rejectin this stuff based on something specific or just by a general set of criteria like second hand accounts being unreliable.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 16, 2017 - 02:10pm PT
I guess you haven't heard of the Jefferson Bible
Using a razor and glue, Jefferson cut and pasted his arrangement of selected verses from the King James Version[8] of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in chronological order—putting together excerpts from one text with those of another to create a single narrative. Thus he begins with Luke 2 and Luke 3, then follows with Mark 1 and Matthew 3. He provides a record of which verses he selected, and of the order he chose in his Table of the Texts from the Evangelists employed in this Narrative and of the order of their arrangement.

Consistent with his naturalistic outlook and intent, most supernatural events are not included in Jefferson's heavily edited compilation. Paul K. Conkin states that "For the teachings of Jesus he concentrated on his milder admonitions (the Sermon on the Mount) and his most memorable parables. What resulted is a reasonably coherent, but at places oddly truncated, biography. If necessary to exclude the miraculous, Jefferson would cut the text even in mid-verse."[9] Historian Edwin Scott Gaustad explains, "If a moral lesson was embedded in a miracle, the lesson survived in Jeffersonian scripture, but the miracle did not. Even when this took some rather careful cutting with scissors or razor, Jefferson managed to maintain Jesus' role as a great moral teacher, not as a shaman or faith healer."[10]
wiki

When you study atheism, you study biblical scholars interpretation of the bible which has some of the same beliefs as mine. And how paganism was the main source of their material they used to write the bible. I studied comparative religions as well.

No gnostic texts have been discovered that pre-date Christianity

The Gnostic ideas and systems flourished in the Mediterranean world in the second century AD, in conjunction with and influenced by the early Christian movements
wiki
year 200, not contemporaneous.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jun 16, 2017 - 03:58pm PT
"This is where we are in 2017, when a progressive, rational, married gay guy is labeled as alt right because he has open minded conversations." -Joe Rogan

re: Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report

"Hey @joshharkinson, your article is outright libelous about me. Expect a public retraction from you and @MotherJones." -Dave Rubin


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/06/kyle-chapman-based-stickman-alt-right/


I feel the frustration, Joe and Dave.


No surprise: People are just too busy to give anything more than 10% its due it seems nowadays, consequently they lose the plot but they make allegations or claims anyway thus causing a mess if not grief for others. Welcome to the new Wild Wild West.

We see it right here on ST. People have no problem posting up about stuff about which they have little or no real understanding.



...

MikeL, "the latter, whose main purpose" was referring to the post-modernist in general, not you individually. But if the shoe fits...
Mark Force

Trad climber
Ashland, Oregon
Jun 16, 2017 - 04:31pm PT
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 16, 2017 - 05:09pm PT
"https://www.crisisgroup.org/global/10-conflicts-watch-2017"


Most are religious based. Come to your own conclusion.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 16, 2017 - 05:13pm PT
Religions don't kill people...religious people do.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 16, 2017 - 05:41pm PT
This could be an atheist manifesto
It's all inside you
There is no higher power
you can only save yourself
WBraun

climber
Jun 16, 2017 - 05:52pm PT
you can only save yourself

So far you've failed.

Oh oh boob drool'again will not like this lol .......
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 16, 2017 - 06:08pm PT
you can only save yourself

So far you've failed.

Oh oh boob drool'again will not like this lol .......


More name calling...I don't like you, you are weak and a hypocrite.
Mark Force

Trad climber
Ashland, Oregon
Jun 16, 2017 - 06:25pm PT
Craig,

An atheist manifesto? Maybe.

Maybe that conclusion is incomplete.

Is biology and its' higher order manifestation merely mechanistic?



I find the overlap between taoism, zen and stoicism interesting.

"It is folly for a man to pray to the gods for that which he has the power to obtain by himself."
~ Epicurus
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 16, 2017 - 06:28pm PT
Is biology and its' higher order manifestation merely mechanistic?

not sure

a higher order manifestation that is merely mechanistic is a little too board to address
a mechanistic theory of the mind has not been conclusive
Messages 581 - 600 of total 1050 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta