Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 5041 - 5060 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
May 30, 2013 - 10:26pm PT
So the "paper" is saying hfcs have the depleted the ozone layer, which in turn created added solar radiance ,which in turn created tropospheric warming. But they theorize since hfc s ,are on the decline the earth will cool.Thats it in a nutshell.Do you really believe that?
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
May 30, 2013 - 10:52pm PT
^^^ Its a trap and a troll, don't respond!!!1111

Well, at least somebody knows what's going on here.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 30, 2013 - 11:14pm PT
It is all manipulation of data Bruce. Look it up, not all connotations of the word imply dishonesty. You Dr., look in the mirror-look at that look of fear in your face. It is an irrational imagination of an apocalyptic doom that a collective of modern culture seems to share.In your case, it leads you to thrash around in infantile attacks on all those you deem the cause.

I believe in the future Wilbeer, independent of humankinds puny efforts.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
May 30, 2013 - 11:22pm PT
The trolls are ever more transparent.
Here is some background on the non-accepted theory of Lu on Cosmic rays and CFCs.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/07/lu-from-interesting-but-incorrect-to-just-wrong/
http://www.skepticalscience.com/CFCs-global-warming.htm
The first thing you should do if you are going to call yourself a "skeptic" is read the FAQs and find that your latest denial of established science was already rebutted years ago.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Lu's latest paper draft is mostly just a rehash of his previous work, claiming that a "corrected observed global temperature" proves that all warming from 1860 to 1960 was due to solar forcing, and warming since then is due to CFCs. It is based on dubious correlations and assumptions such as claiming that non-CFC gases such as CO2 have "saturated" in potential effect, so more CO2 will have no greenhouse effect.

When you do a google search on Lu CFC climate change you will get a bunch of links to crap from places like the Heartland Institute and a bunch of fake science blogs. The only thing interesting you will learn is how many fake science websites exist, and how quickly they latch onto nonsense.
CFC forcings on climate change are already built in to all the reviewed models. Why is it that "skeptics" seem to think that the more they post, the more they "win." I guess that's true if obstructionism is winning.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
May 30, 2013 - 11:26pm PT
I believe in the future as well.

It would be too much to believe that just a reduction in carbon output and more efficient FF use would create a flat line in CC.[like it is believed to]
Naw, hell no,we would be tampering then .
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 30, 2013 - 11:27pm PT
Look up the definition of the word manipulation Norton.

Splater thankyou for sharing Lu's history and connections according to the CO2 doom lobby.

Are you talking in advanced mathematical language or something Ed. Can't figure out what point you are trying to make.

mountainlion

Trad climber
California
May 30, 2013 - 11:53pm PT
THE CHIEF DOESN'T POST BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN EXPOSED!!! HE IS A HYPOCRIT...HE USES SOLAR POWER, HE RAISED A DAUGHTER SO ELITE IN SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES SHE BECAME A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST, HE TRUSTS AND USES PRODUCTS DEVELOPED, ENGINEERED, AND TESTED BY SCIENTISTS DAILY. HE LIVES IN A BACKWOODS COMMUNE, HE RECYCLES, ETC ETC

A close look at his post history reveals that he began posting right after the soap opera "days of our lives" went off the air...I feel for you Chief...my grandfather also a Navy man built himself a woodshop to stay busy but he was to manly to get hooked on soap operas I guess supertopo is acceptable to keep you entertained...


Can you imagine waking up DAILY looking in the mirror and then bashing elite scientists when you raised one, bashing city dwelling latte drinking yuppies when you raised one, bashing tree hugging backwoods dwelling communists when you are one, THERE IS NO WAY THIS THREAD IS ANYTHING BUT ENTERTAINMENT IN BETWEEN CLEANING BROOKIES FOR DINNER!!!
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
May 31, 2013 - 12:23am PT
Splatter has said it,OBSTRUCTIONISM

Why because if its not that,and its not science,what is it.


BS.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 31, 2013 - 01:04am PT
That the predictions are to reduced in #5 is a good thing Ed. A level of volcanic aerosols are a natural occurence, one of many ignored, misunderstood, or unknown. By the time all of nature is fully understood and quantified our species will have made way for evolutions next replacement.

You guys misunderstand the Chief at your own peril.One thing i can say i learned from observation of his posts is that he turns the table on the more programmed of you and uses the very same tactics you have learned but with a lot more force.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
May 31, 2013 - 01:20am PT
The bombastic Chief , posing as an expert on climatology , posts charts and data that he likely hasn't a clue about...Nothing more annoying than an opinionated , loud mouth attention whore but i do respect his trolling techniques and give him credit for thoroughly stirring the pot....
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 31, 2013 - 01:57am PT
Are you saying all about everything is known, the whole 10 to the billionth bits of the universe's information, Ed. Well why in the hell are they still playing with their toy models. Surely they could just pronounce "let there be light" ,then there would be light.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
May 31, 2013 - 09:46am PT
The Chief...I majored in delusional mind tactic and seduction techniques and you will probably spend the day fishing by a secluded back country stream arguing with the brookies....
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 31, 2013 - 11:26am PT
It is all, both pro and con papers, cherry picking of data, then skillful handling (manipulation) of said data. Hell, look at the papers, most of them list their methods. If after picking and handling the data sets the results of the equations went in a much different direction ,refuting their own ideas, then the originator of the excercise would feel much less urge to publish.This is my answer to both Norton and Dr. F.

You know, this merry go round is getting boring without some new material to cover. It is prone in times like this to degenerate into stupid fits of pointing and name calling. Somebody please dig up something new worth arguing about.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
May 31, 2013 - 11:52am PT

Are you sure global warming has flat lined, Anderson?
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
May 31, 2013 - 12:18pm PT
hey Rick

you Wasilla yahoo

explain exactly how the "data was manipulated"

prove your sh!t, Rick

OR apologize for lying
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
May 31, 2013 - 12:19pm PT
Oh, i forgot about you Bruce. I think we covered all this in our resounding defeat of your religiuos CAGW beliefs, but to reiterate.
1.Yes AGW is a fact. As Ed said, a rather feeble signal compared to natural variability.If you think that billions and billions of multi ton eating machines known as dinosaurs didn't influence the planet then obviously you were not at the tail end of their methane release.
2. Intuition is what people like Darwin, Einstein,Dyson,Lindzen etc. share, that along with the ability to share it through the language of science.Prejudice is the trait that your CAGW religion shares with many religions and political systems on this planet-the inflexible belief they are the chosen people and the sole recipients of the divine truths.
3. See above. If competing beliefs conflict with their view of the world, as the chosen people, then it must obviously be wrong in their minds
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
May 31, 2013 - 12:35pm PT
well Ed,

I understand your call for me to be more civil, and not call rick a liar for saying the date is manipulated

I don't feel my use of the word liar is inappropriate here as when someone intentionally says something they know to be untrue then they are a "liar"

I believe in calling out liars, for lots and lots of reasons
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
May 31, 2013 - 04:58pm PT
And NEVER bring my parents into YOUR bullshy

I agree, Ron

that was wrong

all of us do tend to insult others who we may disagree with, fine we are all thick skinned

but making up stuff about one's parents is flat wrong, that is over the line personal



wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
May 31, 2013 - 05:35pm PT
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Which gov. agency denies CC?

Yep,there are none,cant find any.


You fellows get some consensus ,then get back to me.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
May 31, 2013 - 06:27pm PT
The Chief wrote:
With that said, I am outta here for a while. Heading up to some secret spots...

LOL!!!!!!!1111 Lines like that might work on the n00bs on summitpost, but I doubt too many here are impressed with your vast secret knowledge of the Sierra.

Tell the truth, are you really placing convenience anchors on the Mountaineer's route, like you did on North Peak?

Climb safe out there, OK?
Messages 5041 - 5060 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta