Wings of Steel

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 501 - 520 of total 2806 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
nick d

Trad climber
nm
Jul 7, 2011 - 03:14am PT
You know someone's logic is pretty weak when instead of addressing the question at hand they switch to vile personal attacks.

Sort of like, "easy to guess what you dip, dipshit". There's your lesson in ad hominem attacks for the day. I'm guessing you guys watch Fox "News" a lot?
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Jul 7, 2011 - 03:34am PT
Well, it does seem that some have painted themselves into a corner in terms of what happened, and that one outcome of an ascent of WoS may be to embarrass some of them. Yes, there'd be all the caveats - the intervening time, various attempts and partial ascents (if any), the various stories and statements, what is and isn't done on other routes. That aside, Ammon and Kait may report that things are pretty much as the climbers reported, and that it's a very hard route, if somewhat unusual. Or they could report that it's a chip/enhancement fest. Or somewhere between. An informed, factual, reliable report on what's actually there and its context may clear up a lot of myths.

Whether anyone would have the courage, as Robbins did in 1971, to apologize for what has been said and done may be another matter.
Rudder

Trad climber
Long Beach, CA
Jul 7, 2011 - 04:03am PT
You continue to ignore the tactics the FA used to get up the precious slab

Your perspective is extremely narrow.

Anyone who takes an average of ten days to complete an El Cap route is getting in someone's way.

I hope someday you will realize how embarrassing it was to say something like that. You are just miles and miles away from any kind of reasonable viewpoint.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Jul 7, 2011 - 05:09am PT
the facts stand.

Yes, they do. They were entirely explicit, honest, and open here in these threads about what they did and how and not one of them amounted to "drilling" or even rose to 'chipping' in any conventional use of the word. But then neither you nor Steve have been on the route to know or do more than spew bullshit and talk out your ass.

I'm betting Ammon and Kait are going to come back and tell us if there was 'drilling' or 'chipping' they didn't find any evidence of it.
tooth

Trad climber
The Best Place On Earth
Jul 7, 2011 - 09:40am PT
Everybody should know Mimi is a cool person in person. She is only sounds like a dick here - when people seem to be accepting WOS, which means that they could then disapprove of throwing crap - which would cause her to loose face.


Ahhhh, I WANT TO BE POPULAR! I CANT LOOSE FACE!!! post, post, post - tip this argument in my favor!!
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jul 7, 2011 - 10:39am PT
600 posts for an obscure Valley climb....tempest in a teapot.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Jul 7, 2011 - 11:06am PT
Mark Hudon

Trad climber
Hood River, OR
Jul 7, 2011 - 11:54am PT
Mimi,

It's funny that you are so worked up about a climb on El Cap that you've never done, on a cliff that you've never climbed on your own (sorry if I'm mistaken), using techniques that are far, far above your skill level.

It's also funny that you deride WoS for "style" (chipping, drilling, length of time taken) when you don't berate Bridwell and others for even more egregious chipping, or Harding for a whole hell of a lot more drilling and almost as much time.

Your husband has done a couple fine routes in impressive style and they may even be at the pinnacle of style but if his example is your benchmark, you need to start ragging on almost everyone else on down to be fair. Right now, you sound like some lunatic running around claiming that the sky is falling with no real understanding of the whole issue.

A few people here have defended you as a fine, intelligent, fair person, but reading your posts on this issue doesn't leave that impression.
DanaB

climber
Philadelphia
Jul 7, 2011 - 12:03pm PT
Whether anyone would have the courage, as Robbins did in 1971, to apologize for what has been said and done may be another matter.

Don't hold your breath.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jul 7, 2011 - 12:08pm PT
That horse a few posts back looks like it doesn't need any more beating.
Peter Haan

Trad climber
San Francisco, CA
Jul 7, 2011 - 12:17pm PT
I think this thread has achieved new life with Ammon’s party now on the line. Good on Ammon and Kate. We have to admit it is interesting hearing their reports and results even at this early date. And it is odd that Donini would cast umbrage on this long thread when he has certainly had his day on the Maestri threads ad nauseum. The WOS issue should be resolved and it’s important. Integrity is always at issue in climbing.

But also what has refreshened the issues here for me is reading Jensen’s report on doing the second ascent of Intifada out in the desert. For those of us not reading the whole WOS thread here, Richard Jensen was one of the two FA’ers of WOS. He and his other half on WOS Mark Smith, went out into the desert to find out what actually happened on this hugely feared and weird, supposed A6 Jim Beyer route. It is a remarkably persistent, detailed and I think level-headed piece:

http://jensenconsultations.com/climbing/intifada/intifada.html

This was a much hyped Jim Beyer aid route that was supposed to be so extreme and horrific etc etc. Well Jensen’s party pretty much debunked the Beyer account of it, were very resourceful in climbing the route and re-creating Beyer’s strange ascent of it and peeling back the nonsense. In a sense the shoe is on the other foot here with Jensen reviewing another very controversial and doubted ascent of others. Do read the link; very worthwhile especially now with WOS getting maybe repeated.

Yes I agree Mimi. Even within the FA party there is this confusion of tactic. Perhaps a second ascent will straighten out the issues. If it turns out it is a highly enhanced and make-believe route, there we are: is that a climb or is it just silly? We shall see.

An allied thread for the Intifada report is:

http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=231645
Off White

climber
Tenino, WA
Jul 7, 2011 - 12:37pm PT
Mark, are you saying one can only criticize a route if you have the ability to climb it? Does that mean all us 5.10 crack gumbies got no grounds to complain about a 5.13 bolted crack that has perfect gear placements because we'll never stand a chance of getting up it bolts or not? A 5.7 climber better shut up about my tightly rappel bolted 5.9 slab? Is climbing ability really the only litmus test for validity of opinion? I don't think that's what you mean, but it is where your point leads.

Didn't this whole tempest in a teapot about an obscure Yosemite wall variation come about because the FA party showed up online and wanted to recast themselves as visionary heroes and the hardest aid climbers of their era? I think resistance to that storyline is at the root of all this brouhaha, and the discriminated against outsiders with poo on their ropes is just a sideshow that adds a little pathos to the whole passion play.

The fact that climbing can be cliquish and territorial is hardly surprising, though other quasi-outsider sports such as the surf world are far more violent. The very few thrown punches in the climbing ethical debates are all legendary, but beatings for surfers outside their station have been commonplace for decades.

Mark Hudon

Trad climber
Hood River, OR
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:05pm PT
are you saying one can only criticize a route if you have the ability to climb it?

That's true, I'll retract that. Climbing is climbing and anyone can have an opinion about it.
Bababata

Mountain climber
Utopia
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:11pm PT
Although, you can hardly have an informed opinion on 5.13s if you've never climbed a 5.13. Or on WoS if you've never climbed WoS...
OR

Trad climber
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:22pm PT
Wait, who is Mimi's husband?
#1SuperMama

Social climber
Oakdale, Ca
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:25pm PT
Kait and Ammon pulled everything up to the top of 3 last night and slept there.
Ammon's set his sights on two more today. And when I asked, they both said Ammon has made NO changes to the route thus far. He is hoping to stay true! BUT, as we all have been told on this thread, who knows in the past 30 years what weathering has occurred.

But I do have 1 Question???: If you're NOT going for a speed ascent and there are no teams below you, then what the HELL difference does it make how long you're on a route?

Oh sh#t...that just reminded me...they wanted me to post that when they looked down at the base of WoS this morning, there were 10 groups ranting and raving up at them. 'Cuz they're all awaiting their turn to "hook" on up and take their turns skateboarding down WoS too! ; )

Ciao!
Steve Grossman

Trad climber
Seattle, WA
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:25pm PT
I am.
OR

Trad climber
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:35pm PT
AHHH thanks Steve.
Karl Baba

Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
Jul 7, 2011 - 01:39pm PT
off white wrote

Didn't this whole tempest in a teapot about an obscure Yosemite wall variation come about because the FA party showed up online and wanted to recast themselves as visionary heroes and the hardest aid climbers of their era?


No, it started long before that when the route when up and the FA was vilified. Lets see what the second ascent party has to contribute to the discussion.


It's OK to use that club to pound the horse until it's guts poke out but god forbid you use the club with a chisel to trim it's hooves!

Peace

Karl
Gene

climber
Jul 7, 2011 - 02:05pm PT
Photos of the WoS FA are found here: http://jensenconsultations.com/climbing/wos/wos.html
Messages 501 - 520 of total 2806 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta