Trump is an evil piece of sh#t.

It's hardly disingenuous to point out that it requires a position of privilege to believe that the government only robs people of money and "individual freedom."

The assumption there is that we would be "more free" with "less government." Can you point to a time when this was true?

And if you really give a hoot about the military industrial complex do a little homework on our current fleet of Ohio Class Ballistic Missile Submarines with their doomsday destructive power, and the current program to replace them which is moving, with stealth, through Congress and the Administration with nary a peep. 14 Submarines, each with 24 Trident IV missiles, each of which carries min. 8 independently targeted warheads each of which make Hiroshima look like a firecracker... min. 2688 such warheads.

You would think that if the Democrat party were valiant against the military industrial complex, any more so than the Reps., then their righteous opposition to this wasteful machine of Armageddon would be voiced loud and clear. Rest assured that every member of Congress and the Administration is aware of this sickening program but mum is the word.

Escopeta posted
Neither party wants the problem to actually get better or go away. How else would they pander for your vote?

But when the time comes to repeal something they are found ogling their belly buttons on both sides of the aisle.

Indeed. The George Bush and his Republican Congress, didn't destroy Roe V Wade.

I would also like to point out, for the mouth breathing 2nd Amendment blowhards, that during their majority they didn't find time in their busy schedules to use the opportunity to repeal ANY gun control legislation either.

The error is that you attribute that sentiment to me. If you want to say that, fine. But to imply that is my position is silly and I don't care to defend your intentional misconceptions of my comments and prefer to call you out on them since you were the one that claimed I wasn't debating properly in the first place.

Yes I can. Yesterday.

Guessing the "they" is the Democrats and agreed.

Conservatives want "you" to subscribe to a national religion??
Please...

When she gave her endorsement to Trump in Iowa, Palin went on, at length, about...well, really, it was kind of hard to tell since her "speech" would more accurately be described as an oxy-fueled, deranged, incomprehensible stream of consciousness that would make James Joyce say, "What the f*#k are you talking about?" before drinking himself to a thankful death. From what it's possible to piece together, or maybe to interpret, like it's Faulkner at his most obscure, Obama is a pussy, liberals are victimizing real conservatives, and Trump will, sh#t, make America great again or something. Seriously, you figure this sh#t out: "Where, in the private sector, you actually have to balance budgets in order to prioritize, to keep the main thing, the main thing, and he knows the main thing: a president is to keep us safe economically and militarily. He knows the main thing, and he knows how to lead the charge."
there is no reason that we would treat this speech as anything other than ranting madness, which comes across even more when you watch it and see Palin shifting and twitching and gesticulating around like a ferret that got into the meth stash. Surely, Trump had to pay her to be there. Palin may be many things, but she knows how to grift for some cash

Surely, Trump had to pay her to be there. Palin may be many things, but she knows how to grift for some cash. Surely, Trump regretted it as soon as he realized he would have to stand there for however long Palin was going to have to blather on before she finally crashed and needed another hit of Klonopin or Vicodin or whatever takes the edge off her mania. In fact, you can pinpoint the moment when Trump realized that he might have made a terrible mistake. It's about 13 minutes in:


You gotta love that look of Trump glancing angrily to the side, as if asking some poor, demeaned assistant, "When the f*#k is this kooky broad gonna finish? I got a tanning appointment." Don't pity Trump here. Laugh at him for thinking that he was getting a loyal dog when what he really bought was a rabid wolverine.

Trying to discern the substance of a Palin speech is like trying to figure out how to stick your hand into a roach-filled hole to get that coin you dropped: you might find what you're looking for, but you're gonna end up disgusted, skeeved out, and coated with goo. And here is that goo-slicked nickel: "The permanent political class has been doing the bidding of their campaign donor class, and that’s why you see that the borders are kept open. For them, for their cheap labor that they want to come in. That’s why they’ve been bloating budgets. It’s for crony capitalists to be able suck off of them." Leaving aside the obvious jokes on the phrase "suck off of them," Palin dissed "crony capitalist" in front of a man who has profited mightily from that system. That kind of ideological dissonance might be alarming, but, well, Palin.

Oh, and f*#k you, John McCain.

Oh, and f*#k you, John McCain.