Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
Norton
I can understand how two people in love and devoted to each other would want to make a public demonstration of their will to want to be together exsclusively for the rest of their lives.
I Truely feel how important this is. (even though I've never been married). My only arguement is in the language and the meaning thereof. And I condone ALL the rights thereof!
But garsh darnit jus take the word "marriage" out of it. It's NOT the same thing!
And it should not be coined under the same term. That's all I stand for. Does that make me a homophobe?
I like ur poignancy though!!
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Is that light the end of the tunnel or a train?
|
|
But garsh darnit jus take the word "marriage" out of it.
Would you prefer it called Bondage?
WTF is the big deal about a word?
Call it "whodafukcarez"
You know we have some real serious problems out there and this one (like the abortion debacle) isn't one of them. People should be more concerned about the mass die offs of honey bees recently.
If we lose the bees we as a specious have maybe five years left to survive.
Then it wont matter who you mate and marry.
This is such a divisive non issue distraction.
|
|
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
I Truely had a VERY thought provoking, learning, inspirational, entertaining day!!!!!
I'm gonna go hug a gay tomorrow!
I hope you'all go hug a Christian !
I love you all!
BB
|
|
Dr. Christ
Mountain climber
State of Mine
|
|
just one penis and one vagina because BODY PARTS are the ONLY reason to decide who gets to marry who
That is what the constitution says...
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, depending on genitalia of course...
But garsh darnit jus take the word "marriage" out of it. It's NOT the same thing!
And it should not be coined under the same term. That's all I stand for. Does that make me a homophobe?
So you want to deny an entire group of people the legal rights we as a society bestow to a committed union because of the word used to describe it... based solely on the genitalia involved? That not only makes you a homophobe... it makes you a fuking idiot to boot.
|
|
pyro
Big Wall climber
Calabasas
|
|
amen drF!
f*#k the religous zealots!
|
|
FRUMY
Trad climber
SHERMAN OAKS,CA
|
|
How true.
|
|
Brandon-
climber
The Granite State.
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 8, 2013 - 11:34am PT
|
Blublockr,
Your determination on this thread is great, but you have yet to make a valid point.
All you do is try to state that your opinion is superior, and cite the bible.
Nobodys opinion is superior, we all deserve equal consideration. That's how humans should roll, yo.
And, you've already been proven to be cherry picking scripture to suit your opinion.
Keep trying though, you're good for a few laughs, if nothing else. :)
And, this is just nitpicking, but learn how grammar works! Nothing makes you appear more stupid to someone who has a solid grasp on proper grammar than someone who is apparently too stupid to use it. You are immediately discounted when you suck at writing intellectual thoughts.
|
|
Skeptimistic
Mountain climber
La Mancha
|
|
I'm gonna go hug a gay tomorrow!
You probably hug more than a few, you just don't know it. Even some of your most devout friends might be gay. Or perhaps you should look deep into the eyes of the person staring back at you each time you look in the mirror. Might be some urges you're working overtime to keep under wraps...
I hope you'all go hug a Christian !
I do every day. My wife is a Catholic.
|
|
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
make you the particularly vile type who doesnt have enough integrity to admit it and stand behind the consequences of his actions based on beliefs
Hey, wait a minute. IM STANDING RIGHT HERE! By myself in the middle of a pack of wolves
And I am voiceing my opinion. Isn't that what America is all about? Atleast I'm not out beating up people for not believing In what I believe! Or threatening them.
I gave in to all ur bodily demands, a contract of legality, a tax break, a public demonstration..
And because I wanna call it a "civil union" you say "NO. Your a homophobe" Fine!
I've been called worse on this thread;
Idiot
unchristian
dumbfucr
sad bitter soul
fuking moran
bigot
fukwad
fuking idiot
self satisfied jerk
stupid ass fukwad
ignorant fukhead
vile
I can see why ur holding on so tight to language, U express so well!
|
|
Dr. Christ
Mountain climber
State of Mine
|
|
Sweet, most of those are mine. Idiot.
|
|
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
One union is between a boy and a girl with intent on having more boys and girls.
One union is between a boy and a boy with no intent
Why do they call them Boyscouts and Girlscouts. Why not jus Scouts
BECAUSE THERE'S A DIFFERENCE! DUH
|
|
michaeld
Sport climber
Sacramento
|
|
Your religion is not everyone's religion.
|
|
Brandon-
climber
The Granite State.
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 8, 2013 - 08:40pm PT
|
Some marriages are between two men and two women. They are legal. Your homophobia has no place here. Go away, you judgmental fool.
|
|
Dr. Christ
Mountain climber
State of Mine
|
|
One union is between a boy and a girl with intent on having more boys and girls.
One union is between a boy and a boy with no intent
You actually think the intention of every union between a boy and girl is to have more children? Should we call it something different if a man and woman choose to spend their lives together but don't intend to have children? What if they intend to have children but can't?
You actually think there is NO intention in homosexual unions?
You are a fuking idiot.
|
|
Tready
Trad climber
Quito
|
|
Man, blue, you can spin it however you want, and more than likely, you'll ignore this, just like you've ignored my other questions. Seems like you're content to spout nonsensical BS when confronted with legitimate questions.
But you are treating other people differently because of their sexual orientation. You can tell whatever rambling stories you want, but at its heart, you're saying that gay people aren't entitled to the same rights that straight people are. How can you justify that?
|
|
Sierra Ledge Rat
Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
|
|
Food for thought.
How about a couple that can't have children? Should they be forced to divorce? How long do we wait before forcing them to divorce? Who makes that decision?
Morals are irrelevant.
The Bible is irrelevant.
The Constitution is all that matters.
Blue, if you want to live in a country when religion and morals are legislated, then MOVE TO IRAN!
|
|
blahblah
Gym climber
Boulder
|
|
Rush had a pretty good one today.
A serviceman said:
First homosexuality in the military was illegal;
then it was "don't ask don't tell";
then it became optional . . .
I'm getting out before it becomes mandatory!
|
|
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
Hey norton
How about posting what the constitution specificly sez about marriage.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Is that light the end of the tunnel or a train?
|
|
OK BLUEB here just for your reading enjoyment.
Only took a few minutes.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#marr
Marriage
In 2004, a lot of controversy began to swirl around the topic of marriage as homosexual marriage entered the news once again. In 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ordered that the state must make accommodations for gay unions, bringing the issue into the public eye. Vermont created civil unions as a result. In 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Court went a step further, and ruled that the state must accommodate not just an institution equal to marriage, as civil union was designed to be, but that gay marriage itself must be offered in the state. Subsequently, mayors in New York and California began to offer gay marriage in their towns and cities, citing civil rights concerns. Those opposed to gay marriage began to urge that an amendment to the Constitution be created to define marriage as being between a man and a woman only. Opponents of the amendment pointed to the failed Prohibition Amendment as a reason why such social issues should stay out of the Constitution. In the absence of any such amendment, however, marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution at any point. More information is available on the Marriage Topic Page.
marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution at any point.
You make a great...ahem, "straight" man.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!