Lance Armstrong accepts lifetime ban, loss of Tour de France

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 421 - 440 of total 798 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Oct 18, 2012 - 03:51am PT
Praying Not as Effective as Doping It in Tebow's Case.--Merced Post


On doping:

“The riders will play by whatever rules are there. The rules can be improved. Part of that is using science; power outputs, strain gauges. I don’t think we need to suspend people for using Rogaine; it’s the big, massive oxygen drugs we need to push out of the sport, so people can actually have a chance to win the race without having to dope themselves to the max.”
---Greg Lemond, ADD sufferer, 10/06/12
http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/10/new/must-hear-greg-lemond-speaks-out-in-wide-ranging-interview-on-irish-radio_256161
zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Oct 18, 2012 - 08:04pm PT
JUST HOW MUCH DO YOU NEED AND HOW OFTEN?

I would like some of those folks who have admitted to doping to post their doping regimens.

I would also like Lance Armstrong to do the same, if he ever gets around to admitting it.

I want to know how much, what type and how often the drugs or procedures were utilized.

Let's see some controlled studies of the physiological benefits (or lack thereof) which accrue from using these techniques.



mountainlion

Trad climber
California
Oct 18, 2012 - 11:53pm PT
who was the climber from the stonemaster era who was on the juice?
apinguat

Trad climber
kingfield, me
Oct 20, 2012 - 08:03am PT
I would like some of those folks who have admitted to doping to post their doping regimens.

I would also like Lance Armstrong to do the same, if he ever gets around to admitting it.

I want to know how much, what type and how often the drugs or procedures were utilized.

Let's see some controlled studies of the physiological benefits (or lack thereof) which accrue from using these techniques.

some of those answers are in here on how to use transfusions, EPO and avoid detection as well as Contador data
http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2012/behind-scenes-contador-cas-hearing-michael-ashenden

This is pretty long (landis interview), but his gateway drug was a testosterone patches and he also used a cream.
http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/02/news/complete-transcript-paul-kimmages-interview-of-floyd-landis_158328


zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Oct 20, 2012 - 11:35am PT
^Thanks
can't say

Social climber
Pasadena CA
Oct 20, 2012 - 12:06pm PT
I wonder how badass these guys could've been if they had doped?
and then there's this guy. What do ya think, did he dope too?
and don't forget this 1-off wonder of the 84 games.
WBraun

climber
Oct 20, 2012 - 12:14pm PT
I jucied.


I addmit it


zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Oct 20, 2012 - 12:23pm PT
I wonder if Pharmstrong (new one on me) has developed a case of Romnesia?
Srbphoto

climber
Kennewick wa
Oct 21, 2012 - 01:48pm PT
Armstrong's 2001 sample was suspect but not positive, says head of Lausanne lab

By: Cycling News Published: October 21,


Lance Armstrong provided a suspicious doping control at the 2001 Tour de Suisse but did not test positive for EPO, according to Martial Saugy, the director of the Lausanne laboratory which carried out the tests.

Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton both testified to the US Anti-Doping Agency that Armstrong had told them that he had tested positive in Switzerland in 2001 but that the UCI had covered up the result. The UCI has denied any such collusion.

Speaking to AFP, Saugy said that Armstrong did not test positive for EPO but his sample was one of the three from the race to be flagged as “suspect." As an "important competitor," Armstrong was called before the UCI to provide an explanation. Armstrong returned another such suspect sample at the Dauphiné Liberé in 2002, which was analysed by a different laboratory.

“There was no positive test on the Tour of Switzerland in 2001,” Saugy told AFP. “Armstrong had another suspect result during the 2002 Dauphiné Liberé. The politics of the UCI at that time, if there was such a result involving an important competitor, was to meet them and ask for an explanation. That was their approach to prevention.”

Saugy said that it was only in 2002 that he realised that Armstrong had been among the riders who had returned a suspect sample at the Tour de Suisse.

“The UCI said to me at the end of June 2002: 'we warned the rider for whom you had a suspect result in 2001, he gave another suspect return at another lab and he would like to know by which method it was tested,'” Saugy said. "The rider was Armstrong. It was then that I learned about it."

Saugy also noted that while Armstrong’s sample from the 2001 Tour de Suisse was suspicious, from a legal standpoint, it would be difficult for USADA to consider it as a positive test.

“There's no way today that this could be defended as a positive result, it's impossible," he said. "Since 2003, procedures oblige taking into account the risks of a false-positive which could verify that urine had not been affected by the physiology of the cyclist or degraded by bacteria.

"This was not done at the time and the urine no longer exists because the rules did not require keeping it."



matisse

climber
Oct 21, 2012 - 02:04pm PT
I haven't read the entire thread, but can't say you are joking about the 84 cycling team right? They blood doped using relatives blood. One had a transfusion reaction. Dave grylls refused to do it and was almost kicked off the team.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1119061/index.htm
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Oct 21, 2012 - 03:52pm PT
If its necessary to have an 'anti-doping' agency because all the top athletes are doping then the whole activity is doomed and so corrupted by money as to make policing it a futile and pointless affair. Why bother? Who cares? And it's just another reason why it's so unfortunate formal competition and money have come to climbing as a side 'benefit' of gyms.
zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Oct 21, 2012 - 04:24pm PT
bears repeating and probably better than any side benefit of Jim Jones!



another case of the juice gone wrong

apinguat

Trad climber
kingfield, me
Oct 22, 2012 - 09:08am PT
Don't get too excited. last time they left the name blank a year later it was back in there. he was the best of the dirty.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Oct 22, 2012 - 09:35am PT
Just wait for the movie... LA will be rolling in cash...
Curt

Boulder climber
Gilbert, AZ
Oct 22, 2012 - 02:41pm PT
All cycling has done is to make their own sport completely irrelevant. So, who won those 7 TDF's now anyway? What a f*#king joke.

Curt
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Oct 22, 2012 - 03:05pm PT
Yeah, like any of the top 10 finisher's wasn't doping...
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Oct 22, 2012 - 03:14pm PT
Again, when all the top riders doped, the only conclusion of note that matters is we should not want our sport corrupted by money and sponsorship as the progression is both obvious or natural. Either that or all sports should say who gives a f*#k and let people do what they want because when sports need policing they long ago stopped being sport. Masturbatory handwringing over this sort of thing, while entertaining, is basically pointless.
Radish

Trad climber
SeKi, California
Oct 22, 2012 - 03:29pm PT
Okay, Touche', its time to move camp over to Major League Baseball eh.............
Hardman Knott

Gym climber
Muir Woods National Monument, Mill Valley, Ca
Oct 22, 2012 - 03:33pm PT
This is all a steaming crock of bullshít unless Eddy Merckx is stripped of his five Tour wins...
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Oct 22, 2012 - 04:27pm PT
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2012/10/22/decision-day-for-lance-armstrong/

And another:
If Armstrong's Tour victories are not reassigned there would be a hole in the record books, marking a shift from how organizers treated similar cases in the past.

When Alberto Contador was stripped of his 2010 Tour victory for a doping violation, organizers awarded the title to Andy Schleck. In 2006, Oscar Pereiro was awarded the victory after the doping disqualification of American rider Floyd Landis.

USADA also thinks the Tour titles should not be given to other riders who finished on the podium, such was the level of doping during Armstrong's era.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2012/10/22/decision-day-for-lance-armstrong/#ixzz2A3tgX7xs


Latest notice in this medium.
Messages 421 - 440 of total 798 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta