Fattrad nuked - classic

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 421 - 440 of total 863 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:27pm PT
bluey
also FortMental
non-partisan censorship.
Apparently based upon CMac's opinion of who's gotten too far past the social norms of decency.
Whatever they are.
Or perhaps for taking up too much bandwidth, however that is measured.
CMac hasn't really been specific.
Perhaps his advertisers have complained?

As you know, others have previously been nuked for "pornography", which is of course in the eyes of the beholder.
At least one of the "pornographers" has been allowed back. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

EDIT: locker: right on cue!!
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:35pm PT
Nice, Locker


Keep testing the limits

I would hate to lose my running mate.
apogee

climber
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:40pm PT
Dude, you are sooooo on the edge right now...
tornado

climber
lawrence kansas
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:45pm PT
How many is enough? Until we all sing the same tune in lock-step? Is that the goal?

I can understand some banning, but use uniform standards on a rational basis.




When all of the folks who have made ten's of thousands of posts that have nothing to do with climbing have been deactivated it will be enough. If I want the opinion of some old fat people who do not climb I could hang out at a doughnut shop.


Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:48pm PT
Because maybe they were not seen
by the wrong people, until now?
apogee

climber
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:51pm PT
Awright, buddy...just tryin' to get your back...

Carry on.
monolith

climber
albany,ca
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:52pm PT
Norton's right. Bettabe careful in this thread.
nature

climber
Aridzona for now Denver.... here I come...
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2012 - 02:54pm PT
it's too bad blue didn't pay enough attention to see exactly why skipt got axed. it's too bad he's so blinded by the infighting between different political opinions to see the bigger picture. not surprising... just too bad.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Feb 12, 2012 - 02:55pm PT
When all of the folks who have made ten's of thousands of posts that have nothing to do with climbing have been deactivated it will be enough. If I want the opinion of some old fat people who do not climb I could hang out at a doughnut shop.


Do you have any clue as to the veracity of that statement? Fatty and skipt would post climbing stuff. Moreso than Bob, Dr.F, and Norton.

WTF???
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:00pm PT
Blue, you need to breathe for a second and remember that not everyone in the world sees things politically.

It was an even split, left and right, that got the boot. Probably a calculated decision on Chris's part.

All of the bootees got it for a valid reason, I'm sure.

Quit playing war games.
apogee

climber
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:02pm PT
bluering, why don't you explain your take on why fattrad, FortMental, Wescrist & skipt got the boot.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:11pm PT
bluering, why don't you explain your take on why fattrad, FortMental, Wescrist & skipt got the boot.


Easy. Fatty was too political all the time (mostly), Fort put up porn, and Wes was just a nasty man who hurled insults without justification.
apogee

climber
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:12pm PT
And how about skipt?
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:15pm PT
Ron, you posted that shot a few times and it is creepy as it is a little kid... most of lockers shots do not offend me but keep the kids out of it please. thank you.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:16pm PT
How many is enough? Until we all sing the same tune in lock-step? Is that the goal?

Blue, your comment was a direct response to my suggestion that while booting one person who derailed discourse was a good start, a couple more deactivations would be even better.

Why you chose to interpret that as meaning "a couple more with the same political view" is beyond me. That is not what I was talking about, and if you'd taken even one miinute of time to think about it, you'd have known that.

What I am asking for is a chance to have a rational discussion and debate about political ideas. How is that even possible when one "side" is kicked out and everybody still left all have the same view? What's to debate if you and I agree on everything?

No, what I would like is for the shreikers to be deactivated. Whatever their political view.

D
Jingy

climber
Somewhere out there
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:17pm PT


Apogee, you and Doug are an excercise in hypocritical censorship. It only needs to go away when you disagree with it.

 I hate to bring this up… But this site not only is a great place to get information on climbing/share a tale/bash politards… it's also a business.. is it not? I mean the site does have to pay for its self right? I'd hate to think that CMac was going into debt to keep this site running…


So, consider it this way: CMac owns a restaurant which he kicks someone out (right to refuses service) for any reason he chooses.
That is just one of the problems with the idea of freedom of speech while inside a business: With it comes responsibility.

I know I may need to explain more for some out there, but c'mon… really?
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:26pm PT
What I am asking for is a chance to have a rational discussion and debate about political ideas. How is that even possible when one "side" is kicked out and everybody still left all have the same view? What's to debate if you and I agree on everything?

No, what I would like is for the shreikers to be deactivated. Whatever their political view.

An honest man would agree that Dr.F, Bob, and Norton be included in that club.

Maybe even myself. I do post a bunch of "world affairs", but I have been known to post more climbing stuff than say, someone like Jingy, right?

Even Malemute or yourself MUST agree...it's undeniable, and that is what pisses me off!!!
apogee

climber
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:27pm PT
"Easy. Fatty was too political all the time (mostly), Fort put up porn, and Wes was just a nasty man who hurled insults without justification."


And how about skipt?
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:33pm PT
that shot looks like a 12yr old...
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Feb 12, 2012 - 03:36pm PT
Skipt did contribute about his exploits as a back-country SAR ranger. More than Norton or Dr.F did. Or Gary, or Bob, or many. He is a climber.

I think you know I'm right. But you'll never admit it. And neither will CMac.

It's his site, his rules. But they just seem to be lop-sided.
Messages 421 - 440 of total 863 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta