Attn: "TheMaestro", I'll see you in court.

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 41 - 60 of total 79 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
shakey legs

Trad climber
san diego ca
Nov 14, 2004 - 03:26pm PT
How about in the future every one use their real name or they do not get a response. P.s. Meastro I will represent you we can keep this guy tied up in court for years.
David
Ammon

Big Wall climber
The Ditch
Nov 14, 2004 - 05:46pm PT

Just for the record:

I was not attacking PTPP, just telling HIM the issues I have with how he portrays himself.

Cheers!

'Pass the Pitons' Pete

Big Wall climber
like Oakville, Ontario, Canada, eh?
Nov 15, 2004 - 09:08am PT
Thanks, Ammon. I appreciated your straight-uppedness. I do not think there is a single climber on this website who is more "straight up" than Ammon. Straight to the summit!

Attention the Maestro, there is a reason I chose this post as the clue is in its title.

And you other asshxoles Disco Stu and Dakine - Mark my words, what I have been STRiving for I have finally achieved, and it's all in the NUMBERS. Back the f+ck off now before you regret it, or you will be oncling up to a friend of mine in a way seldom seen. This is the way the process is served, and you may find yourself served with a plate of papers that are very unpalatable.

This has been YEARS in coming. You have been warned. You have 72 hours to remove all your slanderous hearsay against me, and I mean every fricking word, and after that you're toast. I'm going fishing, and when I get back, if there aren't some big frickin' changes round this place, you'll be clobbered with something the likes of which you have never seen in your life. May I suggest you start with the Canadian Assassin post? If I see some post deletions there by the time I get back, I'll back off. I expect some changes by the time I return, as a demonstration of your good faith.

I believe in good faith, and solving problems without embarrassing people, unlike you. While you fight your cowardly battles with lies, I rely on the truth. And the TRUTH is in the numbers, if you know what I'm saying.

Don't make me do this. I don't have the time, but I do have the inclination, and you have the money. Well, I don't care if you have much money or not, your climbing gear and all worldly assets would suffice.

You may think you're a nameless, faceless and dickless detractor, but you're wrong. You are merely a dickless coward. Sleep well, as you have only three nights of peace left. However if you would prefer more peace, may I suggest "edit" plus "delete"?

Mark my words - I have been STRiving for this for a darn long time. I do not wish to embarrass you for you are a fool, and if you have any brains at all, you can clean up your act very quietly, and nobody will notice this post, or understand what I'm writing. They'll just think I'm crazy and stupid.

I might look like I'm stupid and crazy, but it would be crazy of you to think I'm stupid. I'm not Donny, dude. I'm Pete Zabrok of Oakville, Ontario, Canada. I'm real trouble, and you could be in real sh|t real soon, if you "get" what I'm saying.

Mark my words.

End of rant.

Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!
Demented

climber
Nov 15, 2004 - 09:47am PT
pete- it seemed like it was rrradam asking to be sued.
Mountain Man

Trad climber
Outer Space
Nov 15, 2004 - 09:54am PT
Why mess up a world class rant with rationality?
rrrADAM

climber
Nov 15, 2004 - 10:35am PT
Like I said in the thread linked below Pete, "I dare you" !!!
http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.html?m=47046&f=0&b=0#msg48064

None of what I said was hearsay, as I was there to witness it, and was the recipient of the kiddie porn links you sent me via Private Message on rc.com. Furthermore... Nothing I have posted is "privilaged information" gained from my time as an Admin there, as if I could post that, this post would be longer than anything you have written... Albeit, much more interesting. Since it is "privilaged information", it is out-of-bounds for public thread.

I even asked you very simple, yet pointed, direct questions in that thread and you never even ackowledged them... True to form.


Like I said in that thread:
...my job requires me to continually have to undergo an extensive background check before I am granted "unescorted access" at operating nuclear power plants... Point is, I'm not gonna lie to the authorities and jeopodize my job. Even posting this could put me in jeopordy of being prosocuted and/or sued for slandar, if it were just a lie because I didn't like you. I am willing to go to court and swear to this, and bring what proof I can provide. If you wanna deny this, then "sac up" and call the authorites on me and charge me with slandar. If I weren't lying, you would do it in a heartbeat, as I have two houses in SoCal, so you could easily win a shitload of $$$ in Civil Court... But you CAN'T call the authorities because it's true, EH ??? Pete, I dare you.

Stop blowing smoke up our ass and passing out idle threats when your "damage control olive braches" fail to make you look like the victim. I have assets, sue me. Please, I would really appreciate it if you would accelerate the process and contact the authorities. Pedophiles are very unpopular amongst the general population in prison, and poetic justice would be a rather large inmate showing you his "weewee", forcefully. I'm calling you on your bluff. Bring it Internet Superhero. Put on your cape, clip "weewee" to it, and do it !!!

Alas, I'm SURE you don't want to jeopordize your freedom by contacting the authorities yourself about this, EH "predictable pete" ???

BTW Pete...
Someone in that thread said you showed him pics of young chicks in 2001 in Yosemite:
He personally showed my some pics of probally 13-15 y.o. girls in 2001 at curry village.

Your version of this was:
The only naughty photos I have ever shown anyone were some photos of an extremely slender and young-looking hottie. She told me I could show a few, as she was very proud of the photography. While she looked extremely young, she was 21 or 22 at the time. I have not commented on this publicly before, as I figured it was nobody's business. Anyone with half a brain can figure out who she is, anyway. She was proud enough of the photos that we submitted a few to rockclimbing.com, but the Powers-That-Be were appalled, and therein began the rumours.

Untrue if his date is even close, as the pics you refer to were taken in the Fall of 2002 in Arizona, and uploaded a few months later. The pics you uploaded to the site are dated you dummy, so this shows just another one of your lies in an attempt to twist the truth.
To quote you Pete:
"...the NUMBERS don't add up."
(Note-Anyone can brows his photos at rc.com to verify this... Look for the silhouettes.)




I say what I mean, and mean what I say,
Adam S. Bingel (rrrADAM)
Donny Quijote

Sport climber
Boulder F'n CO
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2004 - 01:22pm PT
Hey you bastards....TAKE IT OUTSIDE!..this thread is about me...ME!! ME I TELL YOU!!! You already have your own thread full of anger and discontent. This is MY GODDAM THREAD...and here we'd like to foster an appetite for PEACE, LOVE AND THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM!

Dave Buchanan

Gym climber
Marin Hot Tub Country
Nov 15, 2004 - 02:02pm PT
Hi Adam -- long time no speak. Thanks again for taking the time to call me (way back when) and
giving me your version of events. People were wondering why I was "sticking up" for Pete.
In fact, if you check the Canadian Assassin thread, I wasn't exactly complimentary
in my early posts. I thought (and still do) think he's a kook. But based on the information
that I have, here's why I have to respectfully oppose the kiddie porn allegations against him.

The 15 year old girl should have taken screen shots of Pete's remarks, or at the
very least copied and pasted what he wrote. It's rather inconvenient (or convenient)
that she has forever disappeared without a trace--or any contact info.
What Pete told me he wrote doesn't match other versions I have heard.
If I remember correctly you were actually involved in that chat yourself.
It would make your case so much stronger if you had taken screenshots
or had archived the chat somehow. Anyone else who was in that chat could-have and
should-have as well. It's too bad they didn't -- it's pretty hard to dispute a screenshot!

Furthermore, In the PM where he allegedly sent you the kiddie porn links, what happened to the PM?
If I remember correctly, you said you deleted it immediately.
However, this seems odd, especially if you went straight to the FBI.
Instead of a he-said/she-said situation, you could have furnished them with some direct proof.
If you were worried about having porn-links on your computer,
you would have nothing to worry about, since you had already contacted the FBI.

Also, regarding the point about the date that the photos were shown in Curry Village, you are
quoting a less-than reputable source when you say: "someone in that thread".
Someone In That Thread is just another anonymous poster. This is heresay of the worst kind.

So, with all the Pete-slamming, I would say that much of it appears to be warranted.
But as far as the child-porn stuff goes, I have to give him the benefit of doubt,
since you failed to capture or document any of it. It would have been really easy for you to have done so.
So while I'm not calling you a liar, I would venture to say that it doesn't pass
the muster of *beyond a reasonable doubt*.
It really is a case of he-said/she-said. And a bunch of people repeating it
doesn't make it any more valid; there are way too many people passing
this info around as the gospel.

Again, Pete might indeed be an idiot, kook, and danger to the climbing community.
But I simply do not believe the child-porn stuff based on what's been presented.
(by a single person whose integrity has been the subject of much public debate)

I know for a fact that pete comes-on to a whole bunch of grown women;
sometimes successfully -- most times not. But that's another story.

(Wow, I just managed to make a fairly long post without mentioning internet bitches!)

Dave
peeonmepete

Social climber
Gayville
Nov 16, 2004 - 07:20am PT
does anyone need a lawyer?
dakine420

Trad climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 16, 2004 - 11:47am PT
Pete, I am just going to say this once so listen very carefully,
GO F*CK YOURSELF!
Donny Quijote

Sport climber
Boulder F'n CO
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 16, 2004 - 05:56pm PT
Yeah, you'll all know JUST how the law works pretty soon.
yo

climber
NOT Fresno
Nov 16, 2004 - 06:23pm PT
Jefferson is Paco!!!! And thus Donny. And thus Fish as well, apparently.


I can't wait for Pete to get off his fishin trip. Can't wait!


Round and round we go!



And if I remember right from seventh grade, it's "Como esta usted."

You're not Paco. Probably some Mormon missionary or sumthin.
Donny Quijote

Sport climber
Boulder F'n CO
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 16, 2004 - 06:43pm PT
Hey....you lying Jeffersonian Spaniard. Don't try that kiddie porn with me. I'll sue your ass into the Convict Discontinuity....whatever depth that happens to be at your location.
Matt

Trad climber
San Francisco
Nov 16, 2004 - 06:48pm PT
wow- i am on some bad acid!
maybe if i sart drinking it will mellow me out some...
Mountain Man

Trad climber
Outer Space
Nov 16, 2004 - 06:58pm PT
Watch the brown acid

Drink heavily
mark

climber
yosemite
Nov 17, 2004 - 09:49am PT
Ok Pete....I give you some credit. But not much. You’re REALLY fish’n on this one. But I give you credit. Disco Stu is Mark Stroeve. As you were trying to be soooo clever. Its nice to see that you took the time to track down IP addresses...But let me fill you into some things here while you try to pound your chest at me.

1. The only person you could ever sue would be Adam Bingle. You personally showed me the pics at curry village when you were racking up for lunar eclipse. You had boxes @ camp5 as well in the lot. You showing me the pics and me calling you, a pervert is my OPINION. Not slander. Anyone who would show me pics like that is in the same category in my book. It was in Aug. 2001 that you showed me those pics. So you have met me Pete.... we also meet at the base of Gulf Stream, and Eagles Way. Gave you a ride as well back to curry village before you started Eagles Way. Had bear boxes almost next to each other in CV. Spent time listening to your whinny voice with Wess in CV as well. Again my opinion.

2. My Opinion of you clogging up routes, trashing El Cap, being a whinny little wall bitch is my own opinion as well. Again Im entitled to my perspective of you. All of which if they let you into the country next year we can talk about. My problem with you is personal. Something that we will probably never resolve in our life. You trying to sue me over those opinions are as valid as Melissa suing you over the same thing that you wrote about her in the thread. Do you really want to go there Pete?

3. Adam Bingle is the only person again you could ever possibly sue. The comments that he made were Slander and he is willing to take you to court to prove them. Or disprove them in your train of thought. But since you already were removed from a climbing site for allegedly making inappropriate comments to a young female, your credibility doesn’t have a lot of merit to stand on. But again he’s willing to gamble his job, and two houses. What’s your gamble Pete? He’s the one not f*#k’n around. I am.

4. My opinion of you is just that. The thread was started by me telling you to piss off. You bag on some girl for her ascent of the Zodiac. But not someone else. So my issue with you Pete is a personal one. Your lack of being humble and just an out right ass to a majority of the community is B.S. But Im not better in that way. I let you get to me finally. And I should do what everyone should do...ignore you. What came of the rest of it are your peers and the community. Again it’s their opinion. As well as them calling you all the names they do and whatever else. But you can’t sue anyone for their opinion Pete. Again go back to #3.

5. If you’re really intent on pursuing this Pete, make 100% sure that you will win beyond a shadow of a doubt against Adam. If you want to try me then again there are plenty of people that would come forward. Through a series of a supena and such they would have to testify to the allegations that have been made against you. And since my climbing partner is a prosecuting attorney in the town that I live then no worries for me. If you pursue it and it costs me time from work you will pay restitution for my time. Which what I do for a living, Im not cheap. I stated my opinion of you. Nothing more, nothing less. No different from the opinion you have of Melissa.

6. You should have listened to Erik Kohl when he told you to bail Pete. I have no intentions of editing any posts, nor deleting them. I have made copies of what has been written if you really want to go there. But again refer to #3 and #5. I have stated my personal opinion of you. You trying to sue me over that is again as valid as Melissa suing you over your comments. People have their opinion’s Pete. It seems to be more negative than positive. The thread will fade in time. But Im entitled to my opinions. The sad thing is that you wouldn’t let go. rrrAdam called your bluff. You’re just trying to fish for me. Which Pete I hope you had a good fishing trip. But the only thing that has changed is me telling you who I am. I don’t give a crap. You are a very small fish in this ocean.
So my furry little foreigner you should put in a piece, lower off, and climb something else. The thread has gotten boring after what some people wrote.

 Mark

Donny Quijote

Sport climber
Boulder F'n CO
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 17, 2004 - 12:49pm PT
Haw....just joshin'. I KNEW some dork would Google that. It's actually the Conrad Discontinuity.
Demented

climber
Nov 17, 2004 - 01:16pm PT
it's the brown acid. they're putting it in our water
Michelle

Boulder climber
below the spraydar
Nov 27, 2004 - 10:58am PT
a little late here, but, here goes. I'll settle perhaps one question re: "And the whole Melissa/Michelle thing."

Melissa is blond, I am not. Melissa is a nice person and I am not too nice. Melissa actually climbs, while I spend more time bushwhacking and complaining about it (or drinking) searching for crags with nothing harder than a 5.8. I doubt Melissa would resort to violence against Pete even if she wasn't busy climbing; I, on the other hand, WOULD provide the public service (for a fee, of course) except that I'm too busy avoiding him. Melissa has done noteable classics in the Valley this year, I have done, uhm, I think maybe one, oh, maybe two, and it wasn't that notable and a bunch of new climbs on Sonora Pass (you guessed it, no harder than 5.8). I believe Melissa strives to acheive goals and meets most of them, where I strive to become content with my climbing mediocrity since I'm lazy.

etc. I now have to go to work in retail hell, and I hope Melissa is out doing something fun!

Mountain Man

Trad climber
Outer Space
Nov 27, 2004 - 11:08am PT
Climbing 5.8 and proud of it
Messages 41 - 60 of total 79 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta