Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
Klimmer
Mountain climber
San Diego
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:20pm PT
|
You can watch it for free and even copy it.
Flight Of American 77 (Full Video: 1:05hrs)
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/
Scroll down to the 8th news title and watch it, copy it. Full NSTB flight recording data completely contradicts The 9-11 Commission Report. The flight data recorder has flight 77 (or whatever it was??????) fully North of the Citgo gas station and too high and not even in the correct flight path to hit the 5 downed telephone poles. The NTSB released flight data recorder puts the jet exactly where the eye-witnesses who are incredibly reliable in full agreement. It did not approach the pentagon from the published OCT point of view. It could not have downed the light poles North of Citgo gas station where the jet was seen.
Something else did. Something that was smaller and flew very fast and low to the ground, that might have possibly knocked down the lightpoles. We aren't sure when the lightpoles got knocked down. They could have been down prior to the entire event occuring. Who knows????????? This is the object in the released Pentagon security video. It isn't UA flight 77.
The official released data already completely invalidates the OCT and they don't want to talk about it.
At least 2 seperate events happening at nearly the same exact time at the Pentagon. A massive jet fly-over from North of Citgo gas station and something else explosive coming in low from the South of the Citgo gas station.
The NTSB flight recorder data agrees with very reliable eye-witnesses North of the Citgo gas station, but completely contradicts the released Pentagon security video footage showing a fast moving object close to the ground and South of the Citgo gas station in line with knocking down light poles.
My hypothesis:
One was a slight of hand decoy, North of the Citgo gas station painted up as flight 77 and flew over The Pentagon as the explosion happened a moment before or after, and the other was something that slammed into The Pentagon that exploded coming in low and fast South of the Citgo gas station. The public official evidence/data pretty much confirms this and really doesn't allow for much else.
One thing is for sure, the official evidence/data released contradicts itself completely, and renders the OCT invalidated. This has massive false-flag written all over it. They even used full-scale magician "slight of hand" techniques to distract our attention, and it worked to a point.
Investigate 9-11-2001 completely and honestly and do it now. The World is waiting for the truth because we know we've been lied to.
So you really think Arabs with box-cutter knives and Osama Bin Laden could have pulled this off? On a day that had over 15+ wargames going on? You really think they could have pulled this off and done all the fine-tune timing involved and getting our miltary defenses to stand-down?
I laugh.
And then I cry for our Country.
Sheeple. Wake the HADES UP!!!!!
Edit:
Like I said TGT. Wake up!
|
|
TGT
Social climber
So Cal
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:29pm PT
|
Look into my eyes.................
Klimmer!
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:40pm PT
|
If it were a cruise missle, where's AA Flight 77?
Evidence shows that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. It's not up to the Official Story deniers to explain what happened to that flight, it's up to those that claim the Official Story to explain the evidence that we do have.
There is so much evidence contradicting the Official 9/11 story, it would make your head spin if you actually tried to resolve all the inaccuracies. For me, the most obvious point to pick is the Pentagon story.
Watch the first 30 minutes of this video and see if you can still reasonably claim that a Boeing 757 hit that building. Simply, there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon:
In Plane Site
|
|
corniss chopper
climber
breaking the speed of gravity
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:41pm PT
|
Klimmer - bet you did not know that the area around the Pentagon is protected by a GPS misinformation signal system that blankets the real signals from
the satellites.
That was the first thing the generals did in the Pentagon
when the GPS constellation was being launched. Duh!
Nobody wanted to make it easy for a UAV to follow GPS right into the
Pentagon. Unfortunately the 757 had a human on the stick.
|
|
Gene
climber
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:43pm PT
|
Klimmer,
Help me out please. What does 'OCT' mean? Thanks.
g
|
|
TGT
Social climber
So Cal
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:44pm PT
|
Simply, there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon:
BUAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Port
Trad climber
San Diego
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:45pm PT
|
Simply, there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon:
Except the people who saw it.....
|
|
Jaytee
Trad climber
U.K.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:47pm PT
|
But many many witnesses actually saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Did you even bother to look at the links provided just above? Klimmer's risible and desperate "simultaneous missile and plane attack" is pretty sad too.
|
|
TGT
Social climber
So Cal
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:47pm PT
|
And the remnants of the plane, complete with seral numbers on the parts.
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
San Diego
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 06:48pm PT
|
CC,
Sorry. No go. The very reliable eye-witnesses put the jet seen just North of the Citgo gas station. The flight data recorder released by the NTSB for the supposed Flight 77 is in full exact agreement. And this can not be the path South of Citgo going through telephone poles shown in the Pentagon security video. They invalidate each other. The only way for both to be correct is that they happened nearly at the same time. Bingo.
Q: What International Airport is right next to The Pentagon? So all these jets are flying into Washington -- Reagan International, with hands on only because the Pentagon is scrambling their GPS signals?
I laugh.
And the remnants of the plane, complete with seral numbers on the parts.
I laugh again.
Those who want the truth have been begging for this kind of evidence forever. It is never given as it should be in any full aviation accident investigation done by the NSTB.
We don't have this evidence for 9-11-2001.
Edit:
OCT = Official Conspiracy Theory
. . . as set forth by the 9-11 Ommision Report. Oops. Mybad. The 9-11 Commission Debacle. Oooopsie again. Dang can't type today. The 9-11 Commision Re-do of Reality. Oh, I give up.
|
|
corniss chopper
climber
breaking the speed of gravity
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:04pm PT
|
Klimmer -your fantasies about 9/11 are incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial.
Learn a few simple things about RF, GPS, and airport ATC and you'll understand, but most of all learn about national security and start that conspiracy theory mind on the track of why
the Pentagon in not going to explain any of its defense systems to you
or the public.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:06pm PT
|
Did you even bother to look at the links provided just above?
 Jaytee
Come on Jaytee, admit it. You didn't look at my link, did you?
Serial number on the parts? hahahahahahahaha
Oh man, you guys will believe anything.
But many many witnesses actually saw the plane hit the Pentagon.
And Many Many people saw something OTHER THAN A PLANE hit the Pentagon.
|
|
Jaytee
Trad climber
U.K.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:22pm PT
|
K-man
Well I haven't seen any interviews online yet with these mysterious many many you claim. I have however watched several tonight by very credible witnesses who had seen a large airliner crash into the Pentagon.
I have previously seen the wild-eyed gentleman who presents the link you attach such credence to, so didn't need to watch any more of his "research".
So you believe these witnesses are, an hour or so after having seen a large airliner crash into the Pentagon, planted as stooges by some mysterious overlord, for the TV companies' reporters to interview? Or are the reporters and witnesses both in the dark control of the Overlords? Or do you believe Klimmer's desperate last stand hypotheseis of simultaneous missile and plane attack?
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Aug 26, 2011 - 07:28pm PT
|
They haven't shown any of the videos yet.
Just one with a few frames with missing frames. Big ass red flag.
Even after congressional committees requesting them.
If a 757 flew into the pentagon and that's what they say then they'd release the video evidence.
They never do.
But they might release them when they finally get the software good enough where no one can tell the photo shop manipulations.
Instead all these idiot sheep believe them saying a 757 flew into it.
Modern science hypothesis, theory, experiment.
No real world experiment was ever done.
Thus .... hypothesis, theory and then speak all nonsense .....
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:31pm PT
|
I have previously seen the wild-eyed gentleman who presents the link you attach such credence to, so didn't need to watch any more of his "research".
Jaytee
I'm trying to understand what your sentence means.
But, it's not "research" he is presenting, so to blow it off without watching it indicates to me that your mind is closed.
How about this: Why is the "official" video released of the Pentagon crash dated 9-12-2001?
I'm sure you have a good reason for that.
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:36pm PT
|
They haven't shown any of the videos yet.
Just one with a few frames with missing frames. Big ass red flag.
Even after congressional committees requesting them.
The pictures that we have are not true video--they are from a crappy security camera that takes still pictures only every second or so. A second is a long time. If the plane was flying 500 mph it was traveling 733 feet per second. So its not surprising that the security camera missed it. To capture this, you want a high fps camera with a fast shutter speed.
Do we know that there are other pictures or videos that have not been released? Or is that speculation?
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:38pm PT
|
|
|
Jaytee
Trad climber
U.K.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:38pm PT
|
kman-
What I mean is what I said - I watched a whole programme of this mans 9-11 drivel a couple of years ago. I don't need to watch it again thanks. Can you now direct your attention to the interviews with people who an hour or so previously had seen a jet airliner crash into the Pentagon? It's not hard. Just do it.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:40pm PT
|
graniteclimber, the still frames that were released were dated Sept 12, 2001. For some reason, I find that odd.
Take a look at the link I posted, it shows the number of security cameras around the side of the Pentagon where the explosion occurred. Also, video was confiscated shortly after the event, even as folks were watching it.
But don't watch the link if you think you already know it all. Closed minds are useless.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2011 - 07:44pm PT
|
Jaytee, I have seen many videos of folks saying they saw a plane hit the Pentagon. Yes, I have watched them. I've also seen many of folks who claim that without a doubt, what they say was NOT a plane.
Have you read the accounts of the folks who were in the Pentagon when the explosion occurred?
(PS, your statement above did not convey that you'd previously watched the whole "In Plane Site" film, sorry for hounding you on that. From watching that, I think it's pretty clear that no plane laden with gasoline hit the building.)
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!