Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
|
|
Nine tens of these posts are over-simplifications. By necessity.
Over-simplifications. As have been many of yours of late.
No worries, though, as many can handle them. They recognize them for what they are. Like big steps, high steps, in climbing. One pulls through. Without too much bitching about it. After years of training, it's amazing how one can see through the mess, the messes, the briar patches, to see what's really going on.
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
DMT's is just plain wrong, however. He would do well to read Strassler's link, even as he rails against its messenger.
He also conflates LG's experiential postings with an actual physicist's rather lucid explanation of our current understanding of matter and energy. The 'no thing' idea and Stassler's explanation of energy have nothing to do with each other, really. Energy is, of course, measurable. It is an attribute, or state. Whether that constitutes a 'thing' in one's mind or not is, well, as you like it, really. And it's probably best to shitcan the term 'matter' entirely in any scientific discussion - given that, with its ambiguity and multiple definitions, it's really not a scientific term at all.
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
|
|
Insofar as that's true, what about LG's role in all the miscommunication and tone and flippancy on this thread. As far as I'm concerned he's earned all the criticism and even misunderstanding (when it results) to come his way. And more.
But his How to Rock Climb was great. So too was his anchors book. (Btw, in part, this is because he deferred to the science and science-based engineering that characterizes our beloved sport, and backs it up and enhances it.)
So there it is. ;)
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
Irrelevant to his Strassler post. Are you here to 'meet out justice', or discuss What is Mind?
I've ribbed Largo as much as anyone, and he's returned fire, as you do, but, in the end, I take sound information where I find it, regardless of the source. LG comes off as pompous, I come off as smarmy, HFCS hates to be disagreed with, Mike L's parents appear not to have come from Earth, and Werner is, well, Werner - yeah, we know, already. I've kinda run out of material there, frankly - a certain familiarity creeps in, despite our proclivities.
I don't see anyone else here 'in the other camp', or incapable of tossing out an interesting or compelling idea. It's a pot luck - everyone here has offered up at least one platter of crunchy egg rolls. In the end, I'm here to extend my fantastically limited understanding of things (and have a little fun along the way).
So far, so good, really. There's chaff here, sure, but enough wheat to make toast.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
I'm not the one banking on mysterious undetectable energies.
No one is banking on such a thing.
All energies material and spiritual are detectable.
No sane person would bank on undetectable energies.
Undetectable energies are just that, undetectable, and never ever existed to begin with except by mental speculators with poor fund of knowledge.
You guys make up too much sh!t ......
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
|
|
Points taken.
Off to read Waking Up, by Sam Harris, now.
I'll actually be looking to tear it apart, and I hope to succeed in at least a few areas, lol!
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
One can't know about undetectable energy - so it can't be discussed, by definition.
That's all I'm sayin'.
|
|
Jan
Mountain climber
Colorado, Nepal & Okinawa
|
|
Western dichotomies!
How about the universe is both a material thing and an abstraction not either/ or?
Why can't we have a universe full of things while realizing that all we will ever know of them are just our abstractions? Until of course we bump our head on one. And then immediately begin to figure out (abstract) why. Our fault, its fault, their fault etc.
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
|
|
Why can't we have a universe full of things while realizing that all we will ever know of them are just our abstractions?
So why are we arguing? This comes straight from science. Information science, psychology, science of the mental life, evolutionary theory, etc. all point to (a) an objective real world out there (that's intelligible and learnable); and (b) a mental life evolved as learning machine and or prediction machine (that maps the world using abstraction, concepts, perceptions; utilizing attention, focus, memory, intention, strategy, etc) for getting on with it (primarily through survival and reproduction).
Nature investigation via science. Basic principles.
|
|
cintune
climber
The Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
|
|
Next time a loose piece of trundled choss cracks me in the shin, I'll have to remember to tell myself it's just a concept.
All that blood, just a concept.
My desire to choke the crap out of the idiot who kicked it loose.
Well yeah, that would be just a concept.
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
Cuz you can't detect it. You can substitute any word you like for 'energy'.
Get it?
Please say yes. Restore my faith in humanity.
I just dodged a high speed concept by 3 feet this Sunday. It made one helluva a conceptual buzz as it flew past.
|
|
BASE104
Social climber
An Oil Field
|
|
So is the soul or spirit a thing?
|
|
Jan
Mountain climber
Colorado, Nepal & Okinawa
|
|
I recall reading years ago that a body supposedly weighed just a few ounces less immediately after death than before and this was attributed to the departure of the soul which if true, would definitely be measurable material. Anybody ever read a followup to that?
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Jan for some reason when I been on carry outs (carrying human bodies) in litters the dead ones always feel heavier.
I attribute this due to the soul leaving the body.
A dead body is no longer animated anymore.
Dead bodies always felt like lead bricks to me.
We had one man once die on us while trying revive him with cpr.
Suddenly a Buddhist monk appeared on the trail.
The ranger in charge made everyone clear the scene and was trying to get the monk to leave
as the monk was sitting peacefully on a rock next to the man who had just died or was leaving his body.
I told the ranger in charge to leave the monk where he is because it is known as being auspicious when
a monk like this appears at the time death especially in this kind of situation.
The ranger most likely thought I was full of sh!t but respected the idea and let him stay.
The monk remained in his meditation state until we body bagged the man and proceeded to carry him down the trail.
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
Dead bodies feel heavier because of rigor mortis, which, as the name implies, makes them more rigid.
If you pick up the torso of a prone live person - you're picking up half their weight (the torso) - the body is supple. In addition, if the person is conscious, they can help you move them.
If you pick up a prone dead body by the torso, the more rigor mortis has set in, the stiffer the body becomes, and the more of the entire weight of the body you've got to pick up all at once. In addition to that, supple objects 'feel' lighter because they their weight is spread over a larger area. A stiff object will feel heavier for the opposite reason. If you were to pick up a cannon ball and spherical bag of shot of equal weight and diameter, the bag of shot would feel slightly lighter. It's more supple weight would be distributed over a larger area - and thus exert lower pressure.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
dead bodies feel heavier because of rigor mortise
Tvash how many dead bodies have you actually picked up that were alive and the person died 1/2 hour later.
There was no rigor mortise on the one I described in the previous post.
Tell me again how many dead bodies you've picked up over the years?
I've picked many many bodies in various states of time after death so I know what rigor mortise is when it manifests.
Are you sure you know what your saying now????
|
|
cintune
climber
The Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
|
|
What to make of all this? MacDougall's results were flawed because the methodology used to harvest them was suspect, the sample size far too small, and the ability to measure changes in weight imprecise. For this reason, credence should not be given to the idea his experiments proved something, let alone that they measured the weight of the soul as 21 grams. His postulations on this topic are a curiosity, but nothing more.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/religion/soulweight.asp#eZ36P1HiCoZmbeq7.99
|
|
Tvash
climber
Seattle
|
|
Blood also pools in the main torso of a dead body, making that torso heavier (and the limbs correspondingly lighter). That effect begins immediately after the heart stops. That could have been what you experienced - or perhaps you changed the way you attempted to move the body before/after death. Without measurement - it's all conjecture.
Rigor mortis becomes pronounced within 2 hours.
Hey, this is just what happens to a body after it dies. There's no mystery here.
The idea that a dead body 'gets heavier (or lighter, for that matter)' (it doesn't-yet another wive's tale) because it's soul leaves it? Not quite as much evidence for that, I'm afraid, no matter how many corpses one has moved.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!