Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 3781 - 3800 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Feb 17, 2013 - 03:37pm PT
Dammit Dingus...mathematical and scientific concepts have no place in a conversation like this.

hell we are flirting with calculus here....

Damn liberal elitist crazy talk

wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Feb 17, 2013 - 06:58pm PT
meteor doubters,

i am really out of touch
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Feb 18, 2013 - 12:40pm PT
Our politicians have become special interest lobbyist for big bussiness putting the needs of their sponsors before the needs of the environment and voters...This is pure madness and another train wreck in the making...Of course the tax payers will be the ones asked to bail out these companies when the business models back fire....
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Mar 2, 2013 - 06:44pm PT
But United States is not helping because well meaning Clean Air Act regulations demand our own clean coal electricity power plants scrubber sulfur gas from the 360 smoke stacks which stop the horror of acid rain drops. Ironic.


good point!

let's get rid of them pesky "clean air regulations"

and another good reason for doing so would increase the profits of the owners of the coal power plants cause they wouldn't have pay for none of that well meaning filtration stuff

they would be so grateful for the extra income they might hire an extra gardener!

stupid government, always trying to make life safer and healthier for people, dumb
John M

climber
Mar 17, 2013 - 01:43am PT
This is an interesting talk about greening the worlds deserts using livestock. Its a ted talk.

http://www.wimp.com/greendeserts/
abrams

Sport climber
Mar 22, 2013 - 10:33pm PT
Removing salt from ocean water to green deserts is crazy expensive.
Simpler to just divert big rivers.

China see's the wisdom of big diversion projects.
and regret the fate of the River Yangtze, which, according to their forecasts, will dry up in 30 years. (due to diverting its water northward)

http://english.ruvr.ru/2012/01/12/63753961/



TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 31, 2013 - 04:31pm PT
Absolutely disastrous news!


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_ODD_GERMANY_FROZEN_FLEAS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-03-31-11-02-03
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Mar 31, 2013 - 04:38pm PT
TGT.....The fleas died for your neo-conservsative idealology...Shame on you...
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Mar 31, 2013 - 04:38pm PT
Just please look at how the simple fix has nicely worked of letting natural and human made sulfur aerosols reflect sunlight away from the earth and happily causing low record temperatures

record low temperatures?

because it got cold in China?

and all that goofy scientific measuring and arctic ice melting is just silly made up to scare the sheep?

seriously, there aren't any "climate change deniers" around anymore

the only remaining question is how much of the global rise in temps is man made

not that it matters as we are already dealing with it
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 31, 2013 - 04:45pm PT

Gonna have to come up with another "model" pretty soon.
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Mar 31, 2013 - 05:11pm PT
thanks for posting that graph TGT

it shows very clearly the rising of earth's overall temperatures
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Apr 2, 2013 - 12:18pm PT
“Over the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar,” The Economist writes. “The world added roughly 100 billion tons of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750.” Yet, no more warming.
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Apr 2, 2013 - 12:20pm PT
The Economist notes the work of Ed Hawkins of the University of Reading in Britain. He has found that if global temperatures stay the same for a few more years, they will fall below the range of 20 climate models. In other words, the scientific “consensus” will have been proven wrong.
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Apr 5, 2013 - 01:38pm PT
the economist, leading the vast right-wing conspiracy since f's last post

first there was "global warming" until there wasn't

then there was "climate change" because nobody can deny the climate changes since the climate has been changing for as long as there's been a climate

and, now, there's "global weirding":

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/opinion/17friedman.html?_r=0


which, of course, makes the most sense since NOBODY knows why the climate changes, why it gets colder, why it gets warmer, why it remains stable for long periods of time


winston smith is dead
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Apr 5, 2013 - 02:11pm PT
I know it is a little over your heads, but there is a great example of a C02 driven hothouse event in the late Jurassic /early Cretaceous.

The subsequent global anoxic conditions caused the rich carbon source rocks for the middle east oil fields.

Most of the carbon rich source shale in N America are from another event in the late Devonian - Early Mississippian. The fossil record is weaker during that one because it occurred during the arrival of land plants.

The C02 concentration of that event is known, and we won't hit that until we double the amount of carbon that we have already released.

It isn't like this is a secret. I read a paper the other day that discussed global source rock episodes during those two events. The paper was written in 1980, and is still a must read if you want to play the shale gas or Bakken.

I'm about this close to taking a Sr Geologist job with a huge Bakken player. I'm finishing up my Kansas stratigraphy. I keep getting job offers to work Kansas, which is hot right now.

So I am juggling offers right now.

Anyway, when conservatives try to play scientist, it is either bible or economics driven. It doesn't seem science driven. That's why I stopped voting for them.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Apr 5, 2013 - 02:24pm PT
I can't believe that I just posted on a thread with Ron Ron and Bookworm.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Apr 5, 2013 - 03:29pm PT
Yeah you guys, it is not a settled scientific fact that the small measured rise in global mean temperatures is above normal variability nor whether it is primarily man made, no matter how much guys like Base arrogantly lecture us as if we are children who don't understand that it is consensually settled. There have been natural ebbs and flows of both temperature and sea levels over geologic time. Hell, anyone who has studied the comparatively recent paleoclimate can tell you that the last 10,000 years have been way outside the norm in the remarkable degree of stability we have enjoyed. Just go to Paleo lakes Bonneville and Lahontan and look at the multitudes of prehistoric shore lines on the surrounding mountains to see that in the recent past the climatic conditions have changed both much more frequently and radically than in historic times.

This Earth has swung wildly in climate from virtual hothouse conditions with a poisonous atmosphere to a planet completely encased in ice.There are to many variables to consider from the Milankovitch cycles, to our orbit about the milky way and variability of cosmic dust, to the effects of cosmic rays on the atmosphere, to natural variability of volcanic activity and resulting type, quantity, and longevity of airborne particulates, to solar radiation output variability and the fact we only have several hundred years of observation,to the unknown capacity of the natural sinks to absorb CO2. To state unequivocally, that we are in the midst of disastrous man made global warming is not science it is politics.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Apr 6, 2013 - 12:27am PT
The collective scientific community compare notes at a glacial pace while Exxon patents propoganda at the speed of light...
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Apr 6, 2013 - 01:33am PT
Ed can you get ahold of the studies themselves and the actual data used to prime the models or are the papers peer reviewed and sent back for editing to the point the desired outcomes/conclusions are reached and that is all we see? Is the IPCC and sympathetic governments keeping such a tight lid of control over the science as to effectively squelch any significant dissent?
It would be nice to think that scientists are above the fray but we also know that funding is the life blood of research.
I don't think the point is so subtle, when after all we are seeing less than a 1 degree rise in mean temperature when the often cited models are calling for much more.
Wouldn't scientific research reach more productive ends if the emphasis was on CO2 sequestration or novel usage of the molecule rather than limiting the technologies that has enabled the human race to reach its present state?
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Apr 6, 2013 - 07:24am PT
Just curious Rick,are you a meteor doubter also?
Messages 3781 - 3800 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta