Rancher +Militia vs BLM,trouble on the range.(OT)

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 3421 - 3440 of total 3753 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:40am PT
Anyway, ain't no risk of a peace-loving liberal shooting any cows. How?
AINT GOT NO GUNS!
thebravecowboy

climber
Greyrock, CO
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:42am PT
actually J-rig, the colloquial double-negative is quite correct in some cases.
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:43am PT
yeah.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:46am PT
I can't find a conservative website that agrees with Bundy owing the BLM more than $1,000,000 in unpaid grazing fees & fines.

However I did find a Glen Beck interview with Bundy that gives us an idea of his thought process on this matter.

I should mention that even Glenn Beck didn't agree with Bundy. As we know:
figures never lie, but liers do a lot of figuring.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/04/14/nevada-rancher-i-did-not-graze-my-cattle-on-united-states-property/

Glenn said, “I have people that graze on my land. And there is national land behind my ranch as well. And I know if anybody runs cattle on that, they also have to pay for grazing fees. Grazing fees are normal. And you stopped paying them. Your daughter said you did pay them for a while and then you stopped paying them. There are some people that would say that you are, if I may quote, a ‘welfare rancher’ because you’re not paying the fees that other ranchers do have to pay.”

“Let’s make sure we get this straight. I would pay my grazing fees to the proper government and I did try to pay my grazing fees to the proper government. I do not have a contract with the United States because I will not sign that contract with the United States,” Bundy explained. “I have no contract. I did not graze my cattle on the United States property. And I would pay my grazing fees to the proper government.”

Glenn asked him to clarify since in the Nevada State Constitution that land Bundy’s cattle are grazing on was given over to the federal government.

Below is a transcript of Bundy’s explanation: CLIVEN: Let’s talk about the — I really want to talk about that because that’s very important. You’re talking about the Enabling Act of the people of the territory of the state of Nevada. And remember, in the — section of the Constitution, we’re talking about territories of Nevada. Let me see if I can get that straight. What it says, it says the United States Congress will have power to dispose of all rules and regulations within the territory.

Now, let’s think what we’re doing. We’re talking about the territory of Nevada. People of the territory of Nevada. As they — they do not have the Constitution. They’re within the territory and Congress had an unlimited power to make all the rules and regulations. Okay. The people of the territory petitioned the United States Congress to make this a state. And they have a clouded title. So in order to clear their title, they give up their public domain — forever. It sounds terrible. Forever? But let me tell what you they had to do. They had to give it up forever so Congress would have a clear title. And what did Congress do? It made a state of Nevada. Which [indiscernible] a lot of them — quote Ed Presley here.

Here’s what Ed Presley said. It doesn’t matter what happened before statehood. What matters is what has happened at the moment of statehood. Now, if you think about that in the second. At the moment of statehood. What happened? At the moment of statehood the people of the territory become people of the United States with the Constitution with equal footing to the original 13 states. They had boundaries around them, a state line. And that boundary was divided into 17 subdivisions, which were county. I live in one of those counties: Clark County, Nevada. And in that county, Clark County, Nevada, we elect our county commissioners, which is the closest to we the peoplend we elect the county sheriff and we pay him to do what? Protect our life, liberty and property. I’m a citizen of that county. I abide by all the state laws.

Essentially, Bundy is saying this conflict isn’t inherently about grazing fees or water rights, but that he ultimately does not recognize the lands to be federal and the United States government or the BLM do not have jurisdiction on the land. “So I think this is very clarifying to people,” Glenn said. “It’s not BLM land. It’s Nevada land,” Bundy said.

“That is a different point of view than everybody else that is a rancher that I know,” Glenn said.
crankster

Trad climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:53am PT
You all realize you're trying to talk sense to a member of an extremist, armed, anti-government militia group, right? That puts him to the right of 99.999% of the US population.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 10, 2015 - 11:55am PT
Nothing like jailhouse lawyering, eh? It would be funny if'n it weren't so pathetic.
But more pathetic was the gubmint's response, or lack thereof. It takes
two to tango and sometimes it ain't pretty to watch.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Mar 10, 2015 - 12:04pm PT
Kill you for shooting cows? Hell, they will threaten to shoot you for doing your job if you are employed by the federal gubmint.

But what the hell do I know, I am a Californicated liberal. I don't get off by fantazing about gun battles wih my fellow Americans. I'm a pussy.

Evidently threatening to shoot someone over a cow is par the course in Nevadstan, because it is still the the late 1800's there. Do they still string you up for stealin' a horse too?

crankster

Trad climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 12:22pm PT
Tax cheaters who choose to obey the laws they like and disobey the ones they don't.
They don't recognize the federal government.
These fringe domestic terrorists are dangerous. Lock em up.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Mar 10, 2015 - 12:25pm PT
Ron,

I think you are basically a good guy. But there seems to be a lot of pent up anger and paranioa out there in Bunkerville, and I just don't get why it is worth spilliing blood over. If someone stuck a gun in my face or threatend to harm family, I would do everything a could to defend them or myself. But I don't want to live my life in that constant state of fear.

That is not what is going on here and you know it. This is not about defending your loved ones. This is about dodging a bill from the government. Stay on point.
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 12:33pm PT
Where did I say I agree with the extent of the protective actions they want to take on the sage grouse? I didn't. I said Cliven Bundy doesn't understand the law, from the Constitution on down. I said he's fighting a losing war, and that it's a mistake for militia groups to throw their lot in with him, because ultimately it's likely going to further damage our individual liberties as a result of unjustified armed actions against the federal government. I read the goddamn article.

You want to stop overreach of the federal govt? Great! Bundy's a f*#king lost cause, because he's already failed in federal court. He quit paying the goddamn fees. He doesn't recognize the federal government. He's too f*#king stupid to recognize that he's going to lose his ass in federal court to hire a goddamn attorney. He already f*#king lost. He is NOT the best cause to take up in the fight against environmental restrictions. He is NOT going to help the cause of individual freedoms and liberties. He does NOT understand the workings of the constitution on the federal level and how those interact with state and county laws and regulations. He's just taking advantage of the groups that came to rush in his fight to keep his cows, and his free grazing. This fight has been elevated FAR and above anything that Bundy thinks he has a right to, if only by his own poor verbal illustration of the situation.
You can claim it's a fight for our rights and freedoms all you want. It isn't over, and Bundy isn't going to win it. Further support of him and his obfuscated narrative of constitutional law, statehood, and law enforcement responsibility will accomplish nothing positive in the interpretation and advancement of individual freedoms in this country.

You, as a hunter and outdoorsman, are going to stand here and defend the grazing of cows in the high country as being a valid fire suppression tactic? Seriously? Yeah... man I just LOVE it when I'm out hunting elk and intermingled with the majestic bugling comes drifting along the frosty morning air some fat strangled "Mooooooooooouuuuueee" of disenchanted heifer wallowing in the mud. Feck. Next you'll be singing the praises of the wild horse.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 10, 2015 - 12:51pm PT
jonnyrig! Well said. Thank you.
ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Social climber
SLO, Ca
Mar 10, 2015 - 01:10pm PT
I was doing some legal research pertaining to federal land and happened upon Bundy's case! Total nutcase arguments.
crankster

Trad climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 01:29pm PT
All this Harry Reid conspiracy nuttiness (myths circulated on extremists websites) have been thoroughly debunked.

Send the racist tax cheat to jail now.
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 01:32pm PT
I have to pick ONE? Frankly, I don't have a problem with mining, ranching, OR wind farms. Any of them would be just fine with me. Naturally, I'd want them to conduct themselves WITHIN THE LAW. I'd also expect them to only close off that area deemed necessary for safe operation, and allow public usage in the surrounding area.

For wind farms, that should be about 5 acres per mill. For mining? That depends on the size of the mine, now, doesn't it? Are you anti-mining in preference to ranching? Fracking I'm not wild about, and as of typing this sentence I don't recall what other options you gave me.

Boy? Ok old man. If you say so.
Nearsightedness? Hmm... duly noted. Don't get pissed off about it, you wanted me to read the article, I read it. Didn't seem to support your point of view in quite the manner you anticipated. It's called a difference of opinion IN THIS MATTER. Get over it.

I don't disagree with you that the government oversteps its bounds in some of these issues, and tends to take a far-too-restrictive approach in their attempt to curtail usage by some groups.

Ranchers may have contributed to maintenance of private land usage in the past, but they are often times at odds with current wildlife management due to damage caused by such populations of elk and deer. So don't come off touting them as the reasonable harbinger of good hunting fortune that you make them out to be. Most of the ranchers I've met has looked at me with skepticism, falling just short of calling me an idiot when they say "don't shoot my cows."

Boy? Huh. Geez. Like you're trying to insult me or something. I know your views on the horses. It's a joke. Laugh a little.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 10, 2015 - 01:37pm PT
Right wing disinformation: Bundy’s Land Is NOT Solar Farm for Harry Reid

http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2014/04/13/right-wing-disinformation-bundys-land-is-not-solar-farm-for-harry-reid/

The Solar Farm land is near Laughlin 300 hundred miles away from Bunkerville
Yet, ron clings to the propaganda
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 01:54pm PT
No, not intended as a slap in the face.

There seem to be a lot of competing entities for land usage, and though I'm not crazy about over-reaching government in the manner they propose to protect sage grouse, I'm also not wild about Chinese solar farms going in. The one wind farm project that was proposed to me was actually a US based firm, looking at the Virginia range up in my property's area. That project got shut down by local opposition. They didn't want their precious view spoiled. They objected to corporate entities operating on private land (which much of that range actually is), all the while operating their own farms, ranches, and private business in the valley below. It isn't just the government that speaks out of both sides of their mouths, Ron.

I've clearly stated my concern about the actions taking place in so-called Bundyville and how they're handling their opposition to so-called government land-grabs. If anything is short-sighted, it's thinking that local armed opposition is going to have a long-term net positive effect toward gaining state or personal rights. It's not that they opposed the government, it's the manner in which they did it and their seeming inability to take the fight to the government level with a winning argument, which ultimately is what it's going to take to win that kind of battle... finding some government action unconstitutional in a federal court of law. That's the part your boys are missing down there.
thebravecowboy

climber
Greyrock, CO
Mar 10, 2015 - 02:21pm PT
yes, this tyranny of paying for what we take from the collective commons is unjust. /snark
jonnyrig

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 02:39pm PT
Here,s the thing- its just my personal opinion based on the available facts. I could very well be wrong. It aint over, and time will tell the final outcome. Dont think for a second the feds just threw up their arms in a big "oh well"and gave up the ghost.
crankster

Trad climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 03:01pm PT
This thread, not surprisingly, provides a reactionary, far-right extremist a forum to spout the usual nonsense his ilk feeds on.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 10, 2015 - 03:29pm PT
Actually, you would first need to show that cows and horses eat the same species of plants.
Messages 3421 - 3440 of total 3753 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta