The Gun debate sandbox

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 301 - 320 of total 4988 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 24, 2012 - 07:29pm PT
Yeah, but most Swiss have a pretty good life without too many worries.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 24, 2012 - 07:57pm PT
Wade Icey is right.

LEGALIZE CHEESE!
michaeld

Sport climber
Sacramento
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:06pm PT
Switzerland is very strict on it's laws too. No flippy floppy bullsh*t like here in America.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:07pm PT
cheese doesn't kill people. People with swiss cheese and guns kill people.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:09pm PT
There's a locally-made Mexican bathtub cheese that does.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:23pm PT
Only pussy's carry a piece...I pack a bow staff and nunchuks..Nobody has ever f*#ked with me...!
Don Paul

Big Wall climber
Colombia, South America
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:43pm PT


They're starting to SURGE.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Jul 24, 2012 - 08:54pm PT
The Swiss aren't going around waging unwinnable wars in Muslim countries. Could be a reason why they have it good.
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Jul 24, 2012 - 09:00pm PT
CORRECTION:

Obama has signed not one but TWO laws expanding gun rights, one allowing people to take guns on Amtrak trains, and another allowing guns to be taken into national parks. He hasn't tried to renew the assault-weapons ban, or proposed a national system of gun licensing, or adopted any of the other changes advocated by those who oppose gun proliferation.

The NRA has President Obama in their back pocket.

They own him.

giggle

http://prospect.org/comment/13272
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Jul 24, 2012 - 09:38pm PT
It seems the guy in CO gave very little evidence that he was going to go off. We won't ever be able to stop all the crazy lone gunmans that pop up every once in a while. But yes it is just as if not more important to try to control the crazy people as it is to control guns.

But it's a simple fact that if there are less guns with devastating potential around there will be less deaths when the psychos go off. Sure criminals can get them (drug gangs) but for the psychos who often obtain their guns legally and if they have 10 round capacity magazines there will be less deaths than 30 capacity magazines. Over time there are just fewer and fewer large capacity magazines available so that means less in the hands of people who shouldn't have them. I'm willing to have to load more often to save even just a few lives when these tragedies happen.

Luckily the guy in COs gun jammed or there would have been a lot more deaths. If a psycho has to reload it gives people a chance to run, it gives someone else with a gun or the cops and opportunity to shoot, or even someone brave enough to take him out with his fists a chance.
Shack

Big Wall climber
Reno NV
Jul 24, 2012 - 09:50pm PT
so sick of gun whacktards pretending that the solution is absolutely everyone everywhere should be carrying guns... this argument is too stupid for words

Yeah that would be crazy.
Who said that? Anyone on this thread? Or maybe just the little voice in your head?
Crimpergirl

Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
Jul 24, 2012 - 09:51pm PT
everyone starts screaming about gun laws....not the problem.

No, EVERYONE is not screaming about gun laws.

edit: Funny I posted this at the same time Shack posted his message above. Lots of little voices in people's heads saying different things it seems.
Binks

climber
Uranus
Jul 24, 2012 - 09:51pm PT
http://news.yahoo.com/3-arrested-separate-dark-knight-incidents-080930278.html

More reasons for gun control
Shack

Big Wall climber
Reno NV
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:02pm PT
Amen to that Cragman.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:04pm PT
Dean...Safe guns is an oxymoron...
Crimpergirl

Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:07pm PT
FACT: Legally carrying a firearm is NOT for MOST people, because MOST people are not willing to take the appropriate training to make carrying a sidearm SAFE.


I also offer:

FACT: Legally carrying a firearm is NOT for many people, because many people would threaten or shoot someone's arse for an inappropriate reason.

I include myself in that category. :)
Crimpergirl

Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:09pm PT
Question - what guarantees someone who buys a gun today, one who is not deemed a whacko today, won't become a whacko tomorrow? So is this policy of don't allow whackos guns any good?
Shack

Big Wall climber
Reno NV
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:12pm PT
No, you wouldn't Crimpie. No way...
you might think you "want" to but you wouldn't, any more than you would beat someone with the tire iron you undoubtedly have in your car.

If that were true, I would have left a trail of bodies in my wake. ;)

Your morals, judgement, common sense and rationality do not cease to exist when you buy a gun.

Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:21pm PT
After the Gabrielle Giffords shooting last year, no less a gun enthusiast than Dick Cheney said it was probably time to ban the kind of high-capacity magazine that allowed Jared Loughner to kill and wound 20 people and have figured in so many other mass shootings. Yet the NRA would have politicians believe that if they support even the most modest and thoughtful limits on guns, they will inevitably be defeated at the polls.
http://prospect.org/comment/13272
pazzo

climber
Vancouver BC
Jul 24, 2012 - 10:50pm PT
"High capacity" magazines are not the problem. That’s like saying that the government will restrict the total amount of gasoline a vehicle can fill up on JUST in case he decides to run from police.

Here in Canada our semi-auto rifle (AR-15 for example) magazines are limited to 5-rounds, and handguns are limited to 10-rounds (keeping in mind that the magazines come from the factory made for 30 rounds for the rifles and about 17 for the handguns, depending on calibre). The only thing (besides the law and your guilty conscience) that prevents us from loading up to 30 rounds, is a small, insignificant aluminum rivet, which can be popped out in about…2 seconds. Does the government know this? Yes. Does every single Canadian gun owner know this? Yes.
So why do we legally have to have our magazines pinned to 5 rounds? To pacify soccer mum’s and elementary school principals and other people who have absolutely NO clue how these things really work. They just think it’s safer cause the government says "but they can only carry 5 bullets in one magazine." So the commoners think it’s less lethal. HAHA.

Furthermore, how many bad guys are going to shoot up a school with a 5-round magazine? NONE. They are going to shoot the school up with a stolen weapon which comes with the illegal 30-round mags. And if for some strange reason the bad guy were to use a registered weapon with a magazine pinned to 5-rounds, he would have punched the rivet out first (remember, it takes 2-seconds to punch it out).

Besides, limiting magazine capacity will only cause people to get reeeally good at mag changes:
[Click to View YouTube Video]
[Click to View YouTube Video]


Messages 301 - 320 of total 4988 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta