Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
Crodog
Social climber
|
 |
The Most Powerful People on Earth 2010
by Nicole Perlroth and Michael Noer, Wednesday, November 3, 2010
|
|
Tony Bird
climber
Northridge, CA
|
 |
this gang discussed all this before, and i can't find the book for reference, although i believe i interested jan in it and she went out and purchased it.
sagan himself admitted the genuineness of some paranormal phenomena. the one that sticks with me is his acknowledgement that certain very young children seem to have memory of a previous life, which has been checked out and proven to be remarkably accurate. this is on a par with karl baba's experiences, which we've discussed on this thread and others.
like you fellows, sagan worked hard at closing his "scientific" mind to the rest of it. i wonder if he decided it was bad for business to keep it too open.
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
|
 |
"sagan himself admitted..."
Yeah, like I said before, that's bullsh'it. Post up ANY indication of this from anything of his HUGE body of work. Till you do, you're no better than Sharon Angle, just another disinformationist. A dime a dozen.
.....
"Chances are, for every piece of bullsh'it you see, there are 50 you don't see."
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
|
 |
del cross- Thank you for your accuracy and attention to detail on this.
|
|
rrrADAM
Trad climber
LBMF
|
 |
Nope, sorry. Slept in the room where Einstein statyed for a few months in 1930, but woke up just as dumb as ever. They must have cleaned the room or something between then and now.
Try one of these:
|
|
rrrADAM
Trad climber
LBMF
|
 |
like you fellows, sagan worked hard at closing his "scientific" mind to the rest of it. i wonder if he decided it was bad for business to keep it too open. It's good to have an open mind... But not so open that your brain falls out.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
 |
Those that try to understand only thru the material senses will always fail.
The material senses are always subjected to the four defects.
1) Sure to commit mistakes
2) Is invariably illusioned
3) Has the tendency to cheat others
4) Is limited by imperfect senses.
Using the ascending process of trying to gain knowledge of that which is beyond the senses will always prove failure.
Modern materialistic science will always remain in complete failure to understand the real truth due to using their imperfect senses.
All their instruments are ultimately defective because the creators of those instruments, (modern materialistic scientists), are themselves defective.
|
|
Mighty Hiker
climber
Vancouver, B.C.
|
 |
Who are the other people in the photo of Einstein that Mike Bolte posted? Ed?
|
|
High Fructose Corn Spirit
Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
|
 |
The material senses are always subjected to the four defects.
1) Sure to commit mistakes
2) Is invariably illusioned
3) Has the tendency to cheat others
4) Is limited by imperfect senses.
Agree. Finally, at long last!
But to then link that to the rest of the post goes too far.
|
|
rrrADAM
Trad climber
LBMF
|
 |
Curious Werner... Where/how do you attain your knowledge, and how do you judge it accurate?
Please, be specific.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
 |
a picture taken January 10, 1931 at CalTECH
Original caption:
"Dr. Albert Einstein, father of relativity, recently met Dr. Robert A. Millikan and Dr. Albert A. Michelson, foremost American scientists at the California Institute of Technology. The three professors will work in solitude on new theories of the universe. Einstein also met a group of noted astronomers, mathematicians, chemists and physicists with whom he will become associated in his work. Here, left to right, at the California Institute of Technology, are: Walter S. Adams; Dr. Albert A. Michelson, who measured the speed of light; Dr. Walther Mayer of Vienna; Dr. Einstein; Max Farrand; and Dr. Robert A. Millikan, discoverer of the cosmic ray and president of the California Institute of Technology."
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
 |
Werner has interesting criticisms, most of which are taken into account by experimental sciences...
first off though, it's not about seeking "truth" or even "Truth" but gaining understanding. I think the record stands for itself... Werner can communicate to me his criticisms via some alternative to this particular instantiation of technologies which are a result of our imperfect way of gaining understanding.
Otherwise, we expand our senses, but it is true that things beyond our senses remain a "speculation"... and what senses we have are finite, and so knowledge we gain through those senses and the extension of those senses is limited. However, or imperfect understanding leads to provisional predictions of what lays beyond our senses, and we devise tests, including the development of sensory apparatus, so that we can push that boundary out a bit at a time.
We make better and better instruments and have more and more refined understanding.
I don't know about "Truth"
perhaps Werner can fill us in on that...
|
|
Tony Bird
climber
Northridge, CA
|
 |
thanks for the original quote on that, del cross. yes, a fairly closed mind not quite totally slamming the door shut. as i noted, sagan underwent some changes at the end of his career. his last book preached to choirboys such as we have here.
the evidence, of course, continues to be apparent. we've had more than one discussion about such things on ST, and those who sincerely report genuine experiences are invariably dismissed with the kind of crap crodog posted up there. give ed credit for not calling karl a liar. he was too much of a gentleman even to call him a dupe, but, bottom line, i think that's how he feels about it. faced with reliably witnessed evidence, however, you guys, as you appear to the other half here, are clearing duping yourselves. i found it significant that the one article ed could cite involved a guarded study which did not address the factor of psychic ability, but rather the kind of mumbo-jumbo you get in astrology columns of american newspapers.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
 |
I didn't do an exhaustive search on this stuff, but I can... standby
We all "dupe" ourselves by assuming that we shouldn't examine our experiences in a much more skeptical and rigorous manner. The issue is to not waste time fooling ourselves about the significance of those experiences if, in fact, they aren't what they appeared to be. As Werner posted above, it is easy to be deceived, but the story of science for the last 400 years has been learning how to achieve understanding with imperfect information.
Everyone who climbs knows that the most coveted ascent is the one where the incorrect, sandbagging beta is overcome... so it is in science, but we actually do it to ourselves.
But I truly listen to peoples' experiences, I might not accept their interpretations of those experiences but that doesn't make them less real.
|
|
jstan
climber
|
 |
We each, swim in imperfect knowledge. Accepting this gives us what chance we have,
to reach the shore
|
|
rrrADAM
Trad climber
LBMF
|
 |
thanks for the original quote on that, del cross. yes, a fairly closed mind not quite totally slamming the door shut. as i noted, sagan underwent some changes at the end of his career. his last book preached to choirboys such as we have here.
the evidence, of course, continues to be apparent. we've had more than one discussion about such things on ST, and those who sincerely report genuine experiences are invariably dismissed with the kind of crap crodog posted up there. give ed credit for not calling karl a liar. he was too much of a gentleman even to call him a dupe, but, bottom line, i think that's how he feels about it. faced with reliably witnessed evidence, however, you guys, as you appear to the other half here, are clearing duping yourselves. i found it significant that the one article ed could cite involved a guarded study which did not address the factor of psychic ability, but rather the kind of mumbo-jumbo you get in astrology columns of american newspapers.
1. Carl was pretty much attacked by the likes of Reagan, and many in his administration, as well as by some scientists didn't like the way he 'dumbed down science, as they put it. He was on the front line when the anti-science, anti-inteligencia types got public oppinion swaying their way... He had cause to be dismayed.
2. As far as ANYTHING psychic goes... There is still an unclaimed X Prize (substantial monetary award) for ANYONE who can show genuine psychic ability while in controlled condidtions*. Problem is, it never works when a scientist is around to witness it in a controlled environment. Why do you suppose nobody has been able to collect this substancial prize? Because scientists have some "voodoo vortex" associated with them that makes it not happen, or that perhaps it isn't real, but is instead a sham?
Big difference between psychic events witness by some, under the psychic's conditions, vs psychic events under controlled condidtions*.
*Controlled conditions are only such that scientists can detect and thus eliminate fraud.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|