Chomsky says 9/11 truthers are nutters

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 221 - 240 of total 269 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Dec 3, 2013 - 10:27pm PT
And others learn the silliness of the truth movement, in the same way.
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 3, 2013 - 10:31pm PT
You have a right to your judgment. Clearly it works both ways though; people get see everything and make their own judgement.



McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 3, 2013 - 11:49pm PT
From; Pyroclastic event 911 images

crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:03am PT
From: Nutters will believe anything event.

McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:13am PT
crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:29am PT
In summary, the Truther's have no evidence of a conspiracy (of course, since there is none and never will be).


raymond phule

climber
Dec 4, 2013 - 04:31am PT

Lol. Yea, Mchale's picture clearly shows progressive collapse, CLEARLY.

What am I supposed to see in those pictures and what conclusion should a draw?

Everybody already know that the twin towers fell down in a progressive collapse.
raymond phule

climber
Dec 4, 2013 - 04:50am PT

You mean everyone already knows they were blown up with thermite?

Of course not. I just said that it obviously was a progressive collapse.

From wikipedia.

"A building undergoes progressive collapse when a primary structural element fails, resulting in the failure of adjoining structural elements, which in turn causes further structural failure."
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Dec 4, 2013 - 09:47am PT
Like this video of WTC 7 being demoed, with the building lesse saying they "pulled" it, which is the technical term used for the act of demolishing a building with explosives:


He meant that they pulled the firefighters, and the effort to save the building, because of how many firemen had already died that day.



Out of curiosity I looked at numerous building demolition sites and could not find the word "pulling" used as a "technical" term anywhere, not once.
crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 10:07am PT
So jammer, maybe you can enlighten us on just exactly who placed the thermite in the building.....pretend you have 30 seconds in front of an audience to make your case.

survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Dec 4, 2013 - 10:19am PT
AAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!

It was Hayduke and crew! Why didn't I think of it sooner?
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Dec 4, 2013 - 11:20am PT


For me, the story of Lloyde England is one of the most bazaar claims of the whole 9/11 fiasco.

link: Taxi driver comes close to admitting he was part of 9/11 cover story


If you believe the official story, then you have to believe that a jet hit the Pentagon, and that it knocked a light pole through this guy's windshield on the way to the party.

Go ahead, believe it.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 4, 2013 - 11:37am PT
Bringing down the towers is not part of a conspiracy. That is just gobbelty gook.

Nothing but a bunch of whack jobs who pretend to "know" things.

The very real conspiracy lies with Edward Snowden........


























































Duh!
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:05pm PT
So if Mr England's cab was impaled by the pole from the rear as his sketch
shows how come the rear window isn't broken?
WBraun

climber
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:07pm PT
NIST admit their report on WTC-7 is not consistent with basic principles of physics.

Thus shows the fools who all "believed" NIST the so called experts were in fact NOT ....
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:39pm PT
crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 12:53pm PT
Crazy, crazy stuff, Truther's, keep it coming. Hilarious.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Dec 4, 2013 - 01:02pm PT
So the simplest explanation is something that has never been done before, and requires an extensive ground operation to rig most of multiple buildings. Got it.
WBraun

climber
Dec 4, 2013 - 01:11pm PT
So the simplest explanation is something that has never been done before, and requires an extensive ground operation to rig most of the building.

Monolith

No one has proven how it was done.

There are several theories.

You keep projecting how it was done according to your wild warped mind.

So you are a real nutcase along with same people you are accusing.
crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 4, 2013 - 01:11pm PT
You're crazy as a loon, jammer, but I give you credit for being able to articulate your argument, as insane as it is.
Messages 221 - 240 of total 269 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta