Camelot..50 years later. Lone man or conspiracy?

Subtract stopping distance from overall length then, and you will still see I am right. The comparable approach angles and time to go from descent to stably horizontal are no where near comparable. Like not even close. Look into it. Just look into it. Look into the host of the webpage too. Also, clearly we are talking about a commercial airliner here, not a cessna...nice try.

“He didn’t even have the satisfaction of being killed for civil rights. It’s — it had to be some silly little Communist.”

— Jacqueline Kennedy, Nov. 22, 1963

She thought it robbed his death of any meaning. But a meaning would be quickly manufactured to serve a new politics. First, however, an inconvenient fact — Oswald — had to be expunged from the story. So, just 24 months after the assassination, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., the Kennedys’ kept historian, published a 1,000-page history of the 1,000-day presidency without mentioning the assassin.

The transformation of a murder by a marginal man into a killing by a sick culture began instantly — before Kennedy was buried. The afternoon of the assassination, Chief Justice Earl Warren ascribed Kennedy’s “martyrdom” to “the hatred and bitterness that has been injected into the life of our nation by bigots.” The next day, James Reston, the New York Times luminary, wrote in a front-page story that JFK was a victim of a “streak of violence in the American character,” especially of “the violence of the extremists on the right.”

Never mind that adjacent to Reston’s article was a Times report on Oswald’s communist convictions and associations.

Three days after the assassination, a Times editorial, “Spiral of Hate,” identified JFK’s killer as a “spirit”: The Times deplored “the shame all America must bear for the spirit of madness and hate that struck down” Kennedy. The editorialists were, presumably, immune to this spirit. The new liberalism-as-paternalism would be about correcting other people’s defects.

...

The moral of liberalism’s explanation of Kennedy’s murder is that there is a human instinct to reject the fact that large events can have small, squalid causes; there is an intellectual itch to discern large hidden meanings in events. And political opportunism is perennial.

The joke is on you. If the point you are measuring your distance from is moving, your distance is off, and thus so is your speed and your acceleration with it. Your right you could still measure the time it took the building to fall, since this does not require a point in space for reference, however all you could calculate from that would be the average speed for the whole event, not at all the acceleration at any point.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x136109

No conspiracy, huh? So why, on November 22, 1963, were the Secret Service Agents charged with protecting President Kennedy’s back ordered off the bumper of his car? Unbelievable, but true. Check out Secret Service Agent Henry J. Rybka’s body language, who’s just been ORDERED off the car.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x136109

Agents Go On Record:

JFK DID NOT ORDER SECRET SERVICE OFF DALLAS LIMOUSINE

KENNEDY NEVER ORDERED SECURITY STAND-DOWN OR BUBBLE-TOP REMOVAL

PRESIDENTIAL SECURITY MYSTERIOUSLY "STRIPPED" AND OTHERWISE
COMPROMISED FOR FATAL MOTORCADE

SECRET SERVICE IGNORING OF ADVANCE WARNING OF THREATS DOCUMENTED



“HISTORY" CORRECTED 35 YEARS LATER BY PRIMARY SOURCES

by Vincent M. Palamara

EXCERPT…

THE RYBKA TAPE -- An important discovery was made by this correspondent during review of video of the Dallas trip shot by the ABC television affiliate in that city. During the start of the fatal motorcade at Love Field, Secret Service agent Henry J. Rybka begins to jog alongside the presidential limousine. He is immediately called back by his shift leader and commander of the follow-up car detail, Emory P. Roberts.

Rybka's dismay and confusion is made manifest by his unambiguous body language: He throws up his arms several times before, during and after the follow-up car passes him. He was not being allowed to do his job -- and it was not JFK who was ordering the stand-down.

Despite the discovery by this correspondent of three reports to the contrary (two by Roberts) written on November 22, 1963, this newly discovered photographic evidence confirms that frustrated and vocal-in-his-objections Rybka did not enter the follow-up car and was left behind at the airport.

CONTINUED…

http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/limo.html

Posner and Bugliosi have many valid points.
But they still can't explain away 50 witnesses who
were convinced shots came from the grassy knoll.
Over 100 people ran to the fence just after the shooting.
BS if you think that they merely heard echos.

Every single doctor from Parkland said Kennedy's throat wound
was one of entry.

The doctors there, also testified (post Warren Commission)
that the BACK of Kennedy's head was missing a 4 1/2 inch section of brain matter.

Finally, BOTH the Zapruder and Nix films show Kennedy's head
snap violently toward the rear of the limo.

None of any of this means that shots came ONLY from the front,
Just that he was indeed hit from the front.