Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
John Butler
Social climber
SLC, Utah
|
|
They have a price on them?
No... and the guy I spoke with (from Liberty Mountain) had no idea what they were for. They were much more freaky to me in person than in the photos.
I would be totally warm and fuzzy hanging from the things, but can't see how they would stay put after climbing past them. The way the sling exits the bottom ensures that any outward pull will be on the bottom contact point, and the spring doesn't feel strong enough to withstand much more than a little tugging.
I can only imagine they are a special use anchor... industrial... rescue...?
|
|
nutstory
climber
Ajaccio, Corsica, France
|
|
€78,95 seems to be the price of the #5
|
|
Dutchmountains
Sport climber
Wageningen
|
|
|
Nov 15, 2011 - 05:08am PT
|
Please don't just shout that they are heavier, etc. First read the specs!
Just got a complete set (3) of the Kong Gipsy "cams".
Here are my first impressions:
-Stronger than BD cams: no.4: 18 kN, no 5 and 6: 15 kN. BD cams 3..6 are 14 kN.
-To cover the same range with BD cams you would need to buy 4 cams, number 3,4,5 and 6(which cost 390 euro total in Europe). The Gipsies are less than half that price.
-The BD cam set weighs about 1.427 kg (range: 50.7 ..195 mm)
-The Gipsy set weighs about 1.045 kg. (range: 52 .. 205 mm)
I think the little button to fix them wide open is innovatie. This button makes single handed operation easy (quick to learn). Its fun to hold the big one at the lower end and stick it into a crack and tab against the rock with the upper part. This tab unlocks the button and it will snap in place.
In some cases you may want to limit the use a large Gipsy in a small crack (so select a smaller Gipsy) since this changes the camming angle in such a way that holding power may be reduced. But this will depend on placement.
I shall post more comments once I have tested them more.
|
|
ClimbingOn
Trad climber
NY
|
|
|
Nov 15, 2011 - 09:27am PT
|
Your arguments are that they are stronger and that they have a greater range, thus making it possible to carry fewer cams. Are you seriously afraid of falling on a BD #6 and having it fail due to its strength? Really???
I am so tired of this argument that greater range equals fewer cams. How many times can you place one cam? ONCE. This is the same as the link cam argument. OK, so maybe the link cam can cover the range of three cams. Great. I can still only place it once. Become a competent climber, be able to look at a route and see what cams you will need multiples of, and carry them. The argument about greater range here doesn't even work for an anchor piece, like the pro-link cam people routinely use to defend their overpriced gear.
|
|
kev
climber
A pile of dirt.
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2011 - 03:38pm PT
|
Mmmm wide pro :)
|
|
Dutchmountains
Sport climber
Wageningen
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2011 - 09:03am PT
|
Commenting on ClimbingOn:
-Fact is that they are stronger than BD's so its not something low quality...
-To cover the same range you would need 3 Gipsies (1045 grams) or 4 BD's (1427 grams) OR: You can carry 4 Gipsies (no. 4,4,5,6: 1285 grams) or 4 BD's (1427 grams) both covering the same range but the Gipsy set is still lighter!
|
|
Steve Grossman
Trad climber
Seattle, WA
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2011 - 09:59am PT
|
I would expect a fairly strong spring on those puppies. Is that the case?
|
|
mucci
Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2011 - 10:23am PT
|
Hah!
I can't wait to booty one of those sawhorses in the valley.
|
|
franky
Trad climber
Bishop, CA
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2011 - 11:14am PT
|
those things will be worthless when open past about 32 degrees.
|
|
nutstory
climber
Ajaccio, Corsica, France
|
|
|
|
couchmaster
climber
pdx
|
|
Straight from conception to the museum.....short lifespan.
|
|
nature
climber
Aridzona for now Denver.... here I come...
|
|
It's simply bad marketing to print...
YER GONNA DIE
on the outside of the box
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!