Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
|
Dec 20, 2016 - 10:24pm PT
|
You really need to check who has access to your account or seek help if it's really you.
|
|
TomCochrane
Trad climber
Cascade Mountains and Monterey Bay
|
|
|
Dec 20, 2016 - 10:24pm PT
|
It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of
only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out,
ARCHIVE AND POST!!!
3/11 was Japan's 9/11. It's all documented folks!
This is Japan's 911, and it's all based on official records and evidence which cannot be silenced.
What is here is every bit as damning as building 7 on 9/11, while being far more important, and
the fact that a large portion of even the truth movement has shunned this report will show you
just how deep the conspiracy goes. It is essential for people to link, re-post and mirror this report,
because e-mails related to it will be censored and people will not find their way here from an e-
mail. It will also get deleted from sites like Above Top Secret and Godlike productions, and
therefore failure to spread the word through other means will give the elite an ability to create a
similar disaster elsewhere, possibly near you. This report is public domain, use anything here on
your own site but mention my name and link back to here so people can find the source.
This printed version can be copied and handed out as the recipient desires.
__
Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, re formatted for print on September 16 2013
The 3/11 earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster did not occur naturally. In this report you
will find all the evidence needed to support this claim and more.
This is a vital report because it documents the dawning of a new type of environmental warfare
in which advanced technologies are used to make unsuspecting populations believe their
destruction occurred by the will of nature, thus leaving the destroyers in a position to demand
governments stay silent while they perform the job of destroying or enslaving their populations to
the will of the global “elite”.
This environmental threat tactic, when coupled with industrial virus attacks and nuclear
blackmail is the new direction the “elite” have chosen to take warfare now that false flag terror in
the name of Arabs has failed to convince the world's populations that massive hot wars are
needed.
The key points this report covers to prove this tactic is in use are:
1.
Reactor 3 is completely missing,
which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything
about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect at reactor 3 after March 14 2011 is lying and
people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of
the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event. Lies must be
told to hide what really happened at Fukushima, because like false flag terror in the name of
Arabs, once the secret about environmental terrorism and industrial warfare is known, it's
usefulness is minimized.
A missing reactor 3 proves the hydrogen explosion theory false, because all reactor
engineers know that you cannot lose a reactor entirely absent having a massive explosion
on the order of a nuclear weapon make it disappear. Yet reactor 3 is indeed blown to
smithereens with the control rods and reactor guts laying out in the open in the outer
containment structure, as shown in the photo below:
Here we have reactor 3's guts laying out in the
open, with the core spray system still trying to
function. Notice all the dust mixed in with the
debris, dust which could never have happened
from a mere hydrogen blast.
A large portion of this dust is reactor core
material as indicated by it's color, and the rest is
concrete.
It is important to know that it takes a detonation
(supersonic explosion) to turn concrete into dust,
and even under ideal conditions with a perfect
oxygen/hydrogen mixture, an open air hydrogen
ignition never achieves the shock wave speed of
a detonation. The dust alone proves that
something other than hydrogen did this.
2.
Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives.
The biggest smoking gun proving the
Fukushima disaster was in fact an act of war is the near mythically impossible destruction of
Reactor 4, which exploded despite not having a core, as mysteriously as building 7 fell on 9/11
despite never being hit by a plane.
Reactor 4 had been defueled and
was undergoing replacement of
it's internal stainless steel shroud,
yet according to the official story
blew it's containment anyway.
That is the FINAL smoking gun,
an empty reactor is inert and
cannot produce an explosion, yet
one happened at 4 that was so
powerful it destroyed the structure
which had a frame consisting of
solid steel columns a minimum of
12 feet thick, and solid concrete and rebar walls on that frame which were 4 feet thick, leaving
it in danger of falling over. There is nothing short of a small nuclear weapon that can blow a
structure that strong to pieces, demolition charges will not do it absent occupying much of the
interior space which would have been obvious to workers.
Unlike what some people have theorized, that the hydrogen came from the fuel pool, overheated
open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100
Celsius, and the hydrogen producing scenario requires water to be in pressurized form at 2,000
degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel
rods. The entire hydrogen story needs the right environment to happen, and that environment
requires temperatures of 2000 degrees Celsius, saturated steam, and thousands of PSI inside a
reactor to happen. This makes any explosion at reactor 4, which was wide open and
disassembled flatly impossible.
Knowing reactor 4 could never have exploded because it was disassembled created a problem
for the people fronting the environmental warfare scam. Since it was impossible for reactor 4 to
explode while mothballed, a fact which would be easy for the public to grasp, an alternate
explanation for the explosion at reactor 4 was hatched by none other than Arnie Gundersen,
who claimed a “prompt criticality” occurred in the fuel pool, which supposedly went off like a
nuclear weapon.
But that only flew with the most ignorant in the population, because a nuclear weapons style
“prompt criticality” can happen only with nuclear material that is 70 percent enriched
plutonium, or 90 percent enriched uranium, and THEN only when a high precision explosive
charge brings that material together in a calculated way at supersonic speeds. Even if the fuel in
the pool was 90 percent enriched, the racks it is in and lack of a nuclear trigger to bring it all
together correctly would have prevented any prompt criticality. Nuclear detonations are hard to
accomplish, they don't happen by accident.
This report includes a background investigation of Arnie Gundersen, who is in fact not a nuclear
expert of any sort and proves he is a media fraud and paid government shill. Arnie has made a
lot of money as a political tool and using the ignorance of nuclear topics in the general
population to do damage to good people and firmly root the ability of the “elite” to carry out
repeat attacks on facilities similar to Fukushima. This is accomplished by backstabbing the
nuclear industry, and pointing the finger in the wrong direction, away from the perpetrators.
His consulting firm “Farewinds and Associates” was founded as a one man show and remained
that way for decades, with Arnie as the “chief engineer” exaggerating and lying about his
credentials, which was proven in my investigation of Arnie and Farewinds. This investigation
is included as an attachment to this report.
Because Arnie's “prompt criticality” was an easily proven fraud, and there was no way for
reactor 4 to explode, an alternate theory which involved back feeding of hydrogen through
the hard vent piping from reactor 3 was hatched. Though hydrogen <i>could</i> have
back fed from reactor 3 in very small amounts under the most insanely poorly managed
circumstances, the sheer force of the explosion at reactor 4 alone proves the cause of that
explosion was not hydrogen. Add to this the story line that there was no power, no
switches or relays creating sparks, and the hydrogen explosion theory becomes all the
more ludicrous, it takes more than hydrogen to create an explosion, it takes an ignition
source and if we are to follow the “official” story line about no power being available that
source of ignition simply did not exist at <i>any</i> of the four reactors.
Reactor 4's dome was removed for
defueling. Drone photos prove it. This
dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's
explosion. Some people have said that
this reactor was secretly in operation to
enrich plutonium. This photo proves it
was disassembled for shroud replacement
as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way
trying to explain the explosions,
especially at reactor 4 because they did
indeed occur, so an explanation is needed.
As a result they are giving reasons that
cannot happen just to say something.
They need to see this report and get the
Arava perspective(Arava is a district
surrounding Dimona Israel).
Like building 7 on 9/11, if there ever was
a way to prove Fukushima was an act of
war and not an accident, reactor 4 is it.
This is the biggest smoking gun at
Fukushima that can be used to wake
people up.
You do not need to be any sort of expert
to see that without a core, nothing can
happen to a reactor other than willful
destruction as an act of war. Attached to
the end of this report is an additional
article which shows that other nuclear
facilities have been rigged to explode the
way reactor 4 did, with an example in
Sweden.
3.
That the destruction of reactors 3 and 4 is so severe it could only have been accomplished
with nuclear weapons.
Hydrogen gas produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn
concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the
reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes
a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than
supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics
that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility,
I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away
walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns well
over 12 feet thick.
|
|
TomCochrane
Trad climber
Cascade Mountains and Monterey Bay
|
|
|
Dec 20, 2016 - 10:48pm PT
|
healyje,
i realize you think you know a lot
i am surprised you even had time to read this, let alone make a considered study of the evidence presented
obviously a lot of work went into preparing this report and quotes a lot of apparently reputable sources
and i have seen a lot of the pieces show up elsewhere
if this is disinformation, then it appears to be the work of a very knowledgeable team
do you have evidence that refutes anything he has to say, or are you just personally part of a coverup?
if you think you have better data, then post up
if your are personally part of the coverup, then recognize you can't forever avoid the spot light
|
|
Roger Brown
climber
Oceano, California
|
|
|
Dec 21, 2016 - 10:01am PT
|
Tom,
You sound like a good person, but you really need to know just how hard it would be to do anything like you say. I am a contract nuke worker and I have worked the reactor building in a boiling water plant. It is easier to sneak something on an airplane than thru security at a nuke plant. Once you get inside, to bring anything into the dry well or any other FME area, unlogged, is pretty much impossible. They log everything in and if it goes in, it comes out. Period.
And the cameras, yea everywhere. And guards, armed, yea, everywhere. And the workers, yea, everyone is trained in anti bad guy stuff.
And last, but not least, the background check. Before you get access, they know more about you than you do. The hardest part about being a nuke worker is getting access and that access is only good for that plant, that outage. Most jobs are only a month or so long, then you do it all over again at another plant in another state or country. I am retired so I only work one or two plants a year. It seems to me that if you had a small device, there would be many more high profile, easier targets on this planet than a BW reactor in Japan. Just my thoughts on this fine morning,
Roger
|
|
TomCochrane
Trad climber
Cascade Mountains and Monterey Bay
|
|
|
Dec 21, 2016 - 03:20pm PT
|
Thank you, Roger,
This is exactly the kind of feedback that is really appreciated. This is not my report and my posting it does not represent my endorsement.
Rather I am asking for evaluation from the broader range of knowledge and experience found in this forum. I have also shared it with friends who are nuclear and space engineers.
I also have some experience around nuclear facilities, and also around space vehicles, where every tool, nut and bolt, and personal item is logged in and out.
I also am aware that there are small nuclear devices which could be disguised as a professional camera or other equipment.
Not sure if you had time to read the entire report, as there is much more to it than what you mention.
And on that note, I was warned years earlier that such an event was being staged for Japan in just the way it happened. So naturally I am very interested in aftermath analysis of it and other such events.
Thanks again,
Tom
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!