Rancher +Militia vs BLM,trouble on the range.(OT)

..........................
That is what the fight is about here in Nevada,..............

That's like the kid who takes a crap in the sandbox because he saw the cat do it.....so it must be ok.

edit: and to whomever replied about the arming of IRS agents,, since when do they need fire arms to levy bank accounts.. They used NONE when they levied mine, they simply did it over the internet and my account. And in over 20 years they COULDNT do the same with Bundy?? Anyone believing that should look at my beachfront in Omaha for sale..

The U.S. Constitution addresses the relationship of the federal government to lands. Article IV, § 3, Clause 2 — the Property Clause — gives Congress authority over federal property generally, and the Supreme Court has described Congress’s power to legislate under this Clause as “without limitation.” The equal footing doctrine(based on language within Article
IV, § 3, Clause 1), and found in state enabling acts, provides new states with equality to the original states in terms of constitutional rights, but has not been used successfully to force the divestment of federal lands. The policy question of whether to acquire more, or to dispose of any
or all, federal lands is left to Congress to decide.
The initial federal policy generally was to transfer ownership of many federal lands to private and state ownership. Congress enacted many laws granting lands and authorizing or directing sales or transfers, ultimately
disposing of 1.275 billion acres.
However, from the earliest times, Congress also provided for reserving lands for federal purposes, and over time has reserved or withdrawn areas for such entities as national parks, national forests, and wildlife refuges.
The Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 was enacted to remedy the de
terioration of the range on the remaining public lands. This was the first direct authority for federal management of these lands, and implicitly began the shift toward ending disposals and retaining lands in federal ownership. In 1976, Congress formally declared that national policy was generally to retain the remaining lands in federal ownership in
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.
The “Sagebrush Rebellion” was a collection of unsuccessful state and local
efforts, beginning in 1978, to assert title to federal lands or force their divestiture. It also included efforts by the Reagan Ad
ministration and in Congress to divest of many federal lands, which
also proved unsuccessful.

It took a LOT of pressure by the people to bring this into a more public light

the government can levy bank accounts to satisfy judgments

edit: Dingus, i manufactured NOTHING. And you certainly didnt "rip" anything apart. Nevada the "shythole as described by many here is 100% with me. From our congressmen to Senators to Governor and legislators

So just which of Bundy's assets should the Feds have tried to take?

If Bundy had a grain of sense he'd have given the cattle to the feds in exchange for his debts. I'm sure he could have worked out an even trade deal. He's just too damned stupid and pig headed for his own good. Digging his own grave and pulling some of his die hard supporters down with him.
You want a Patriot Poster Boy? You'll have to find somebody better than Bundy. Good riddance