Rancher +Militia vs BLM,trouble on the range.(OT)

Have any of you wondered why Obama would seize ALL Natl guard battle fitted helos to redistribute and leave them only with transportation helicopters? Nawww probably not...

Yes, I did claim that Bundy claims some sort of "grazing rights," that's based on my quick reading of news reports, not on anything else. I don't know anything about "grazing rights."
But you are setting up a straw man in claiming that Bundy claims his rights through "any sort of occupation." For all I know, he claims rights pursuant to a contract or some other legal doctrine--I have no idea.
Do you believe that leases are recorded with county clerks? (They're not, in general.) Maybe Bundy claims a lease of sorts, I don't know.

This is silly in that apparently courts have found against Bundy, and I certainly haven't heard any clear articulation that substantiate his "grazing rights." As I said long ago in this thread, he seems like a crackpot.

But I called Base out for incorrectly claiming that he solved the case by noting that Bundy claimed rights through AP, which isn't possible. Base would be right if Bundy was claiming AP, but he isn't claiming AP either using those words or words to the same effect, as far as I know.

Base is wrong, you're wrong to the extent you support Base's reasoning (rather than his conclusion), Bundy is almost certainly wrong based on everything I've seen.
That's pretty much my "final answer" as far as this goes, but I'll leave you with a question to ponder:
We all know that there is in fact something called "grazing rights" or the like that authorize ranchers to graze their cattle on government-owned land.
Do you think those rights are recorded with county clerks (in the same way property deeds and the like are recorded)?
If no, do you admit that Base's contention that the (presumed) lack of any redecoration of Bundy's rights is generally irrelevant?

Probably because he's a no-birth-certificate-havin black socialist Muslim!