The Massive Ark on the Moon (very OT, but of high interest)

Klimmer is not crazy, and he doesn't deserve the kind of treatment he is getting here.

Linda is a more reliable and meticulous researcher than most of the posters here

Linda has published extensively on what she knows. My experience with her tells me to trust her reports. I know very well that she would much rather report on much less controversial subjects. She has been drawn into this area of reporting against her will, out of a sense of duty and honesty and persistence.

So here goes on what Linda told me yesterday (the latest update on a lifelong research trail by her):

Linda believes that government insiders are madly withholding their knowledge for fear of upsetting everything that people think they know about ourselves and religions and the sciences; thereby collapsing what little structure is still holding our society together; and their tenuous hold on control of it. The stock market is already upside down over the greed of the kleptocrats. So just imagine how this news will affect confidence in the monetary system. However she also believes that our best chance for survival as a species consists of open revelations and honesty about what is known and working together to fix the overwhelming problems on the planet.

Part of the problem is that these government insiders have built such a network of lies and secrecy over the past 6o years that nobody believes much of anything they say to us anymore. So if they make an attempt at honest revelation on subjects that they have been pushing to be wild speculation; it will just release societal meltdown. That’s why you see instead so many heavily funded SiFi shows.

Linda believes that humans are genetically engineered experiments by entities that have been managing our development for longer than any recorded history. They are not ‘aliens’. These entities are perhaps on the order of a million years ahead of us in their development. She believes we have about as much influence on them as the lab animals in the secret high-tech Stanford dungeon have on the human medical research community. She believes our scientific and technical development progress is based upon little teasers that get dropped in the lap of some of our ‘geniuses’ (I’ve had NASA ‘geniuses’ reveal this to me). One of the results of this force-feeding is that we completely misunderstand some of what we consider to be our own knowledge of the sciences. Linda believes that part of the chaos in our society is created by the fact that not one, but several competing groups are involved: primarily the Nordics, the Little Greys, and the Reptilians. Linda believes that it is trivial for them to take on human form at will, so it is basically impossible to know when you are dealing directly with them. Linda believes that the Nazis are inspired by a Nordics enterprise to create a tall blond super race. And the Nordics are possibly the more sympathetic towards humans out of the three. Basically these creatures have about as much concern for the human race as our medical researchers have for big batches of lab rats. And we have about as much chance of confronting them militarily.

If some of you actually care to do your homework, you will find a huge amount of literature out there where people have researched and published pieces of this puzzle. These taco threads have only tugged on a few loose strings so far...

The more serious and persistent attacks on him seem to be coming from funded disinformation efforts - which only indicates to me that he is getting too close to some sensitive information.

These serious attacks seem to activate the childish bully personality aspects of some otherwise relatively civilized individuals; to their discredit. This has gone well beyond the fun stage to a point that could justify legal retaliation. My suggestion to these people is to wise up and grow up.

I want to say for the record that I think that any of you who are working on government disinformation campaigns should be completely ashamed of yourselves and should change your tune. Your time has passed!

This has gone well beyond the fun stage to a point that could justify legal retaliation.

The more serious and persistent attacks on him seem to be coming from funded disinformation efforts - which only indicates to me that he is getting too close to some sensitive information.

These serious attacks seem to activate the childish bully personality aspects of some otherwise relatively civilized individuals; to their discredit. This has gone well beyond the fun stage to a point that could justify legal retaliation. My suggestion to these people is to wise up and grow up.

I want to say for the record that I think that any of you who are working on government disinformation campaigns should be completely ashamed of yourselves and should change your tune. Your time has passed!

Like tom, i've had a hint of confirmation in the world i know of, in my case a childhood friend reportedly becoming an illuminatus. he had gone into the navy, served as an officer, and then apparently got the "call" to be an insider. it drove a real wedge between him and his brothers and involved bugging and helicopter buzzing of their rural home at the time of the supposed induction. these reports are all second-hand, but supposedly he told his family "the illuminati are good". if i get a little more footloose someday, i may look this mofo up and twist his arm in a dark alley.

Tom, I meant Linda's opinion, an unverifiable speculation about the ET equation. I know she is superb with presenting great evidence, but she must have come to some personal conclusions by now that are unpublished. Perhaps she might share them with you, and then second hand them to us.

Diego Garcia yes, but a Russian launch even more probable. The amount of publicity Apollo 20 gets almost cries out disinformation, why only footage from inside the lunar module, the prize would be closeups of the "Ark". Creating the phony Apollo thesis would be a great cover for the entire operation being russian in origin.

What's not along the same line is things we observe that don't fit our knowledge or anything we know how to do.

Ironically these observations are potentially the golden fleeces of physics, anti gravity, evidence of phasing in and out of higher dimensions. I don't understand why the mockery of such observations. I really wish I could get a physicist to look at some of my night vision footage taken whilst in close quarters with Sasquatch. I am convinced bigfoot is partially a physics problem, and would reveal many things physicists are currently theorizing about, plus more.

I knew a woman whom was a contractor at the underground base in Hawaii. A very deep underground trip to the control room where the computers were. She described a large area at the surface, just below ground level, covered with camo netting. What intrigued her most there was an array of tubes with colored lights blinking skywards. It sounded to me like optical communications systems pointed directly at a geostationary sattelite and then relayed to the mainland in the same fashion. Simple but very secure.

I still have a copy of the northrop? video of a B2 bomber in flight, showing the engines turning bright orange, kinda matches what I've read about dumping ions into them to achieve anti gravity lift or propulsion. The video is now impossible to find on the internet anywhere last i looked.

I have also done some reading on plasma cosmology, pretty damm interesting sh#t regarding planet formation, accretion disc theory is kind of a stretch for me, works for asteroids but come on, gas giants ? nope.

Existence of a 2nd orbiting space station military in nature, is that probable ?

Whew kinda broad spectrum post ...

i have to seriously question your motives