risking his life to tell you about NSA surveillance [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1404 - 1423 of total 1468 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Topic Author's Reply - May 3, 2016 - 05:07pm PT
Escopeta wrote: "I'm struck by the juxtaposition of some posters crying for privacy and freedom, who coincidentally post as a advocate for further government control on numerous other threads"

could be...

without specifics it smells like a straw man...
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 9, 2016 - 02:20pm PT
You have skills, find the specifics yourself. In fact, to make the search easier...just hit the "My Settings" link in the upper right-hand corner and click on "Your Forum Posts". Lol
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Topic Author's Reply - May 9, 2016 - 03:26pm PT
^^^^

nah, if you don't care to have a discussion, i'm good with not wasting energy attempting to read minds...

ie. it's too bad, that with the lines above, you've chosen to drop the depth of argumentation and substantiation back down to a grade school level...

because, actual discussion with you, was, while it lasted, interesting...

so with sincerity, it's too bad that that appears to be a thing of the past.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 9, 2016 - 06:19pm PT
I wish I could say the same. As they say, "talkin' ain't doin". This all leads to one outcome anyway. Hope it happens after I die and not visa versa.
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Topic Author's Reply - May 9, 2016 - 11:37pm PT
^^^^

noted.

toodles...
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
May 10, 2016 - 12:08am PT
Not giving anyone a 'pass', the difference is who they are willing to target. Obama wouldn't target Snowden; W's crew would have in my opinion.

But, the legal confabulations associated with the 'war on terror' - whether it's John Yoo's Quasi-Constitutional Phantom Zone or Obama's - all are designed to erect a shelter of 'due diligence' rather than a finding of outright constitutionality which frankly everyone understands isn't there.

And those legal confabulations around the 'game', be it the Constitution, the Patriot Act, FISA court, or the legal findings associated with the NSA's domestic collection activities - all serve to highlight the basic conundrum: there are real dangerous people out in the world who want to do harm to the US on our soil. The fact acknowledged, the hard question - to steal a line - is, "what are you prepared to do about it?"

Take, say, a small, well-shielded nuke with a gps destination trigger in a shipping container - what lengths would you denizens of ST go to stop it from making port in LA or NY?

I don't see it as a black and white issue; I see it as a terminally grey one with no upsides, no good options, and the price of failure unthinkable. Personally, I don't believe for a minute Bernie would be making much different calls if he were to win the election, it's that brutal.

Probably the best legal rundown on these issues:



And his exploration of the recent roots of the revival of the imperial presidency:


Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 10, 2016 - 04:30am PT
50 pages of feigned outrage and concerned analysis and then 99% of the folks (who vote) will put the exact same people in office.

Yeah, you guys are outraged alright. I can really tell this time. Meh
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
May 10, 2016 - 06:31am PT
I'm still amused that anyone thinks the president(whoever it may be) really calls the shots anymore...

IMO, the Snowden 'leaks' were the equivalent of the "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU" billboards from Orwell's instruction manual for today. Nobody got arrested, nobody went to jail, nobody lost their jobs. Just enough was leaked to announce the eye of Sauron is upon us. Suppressing dissent becomes critical at the end of empires.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
May 10, 2016 - 07:09am PT
Only when I'm off my meds.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 10, 2016 - 07:12am PT
I'm still amazed that people think the president is the only thing you vote for anymore in this country....
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
May 10, 2016 - 07:47am PT
Wow Esco, what a zinger!
Keep up the good work.
couchmaster

climber
Sep 7, 2016 - 09:16pm PT


The conversation of this thread is damned stilted with Rsin and Joe Hedge being deleted along with all their posts. Looks like some folks are yammering to themselves, LOL!

I like a lot of what folks have said up thread. Most of us are right in our views. Even when we disagree. That's how complex this topic is. Enjoyed reading HealyJE's reasoned posts, even - or usually, when we disagree.

Todays Snowden news, great interview with Oliver Stone. He touches on Hillary and Trump as well. Well worth the read of the entire thing: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oliver-stone-edward-snowden-america-925611 Stone is coming out with a Snowden film. Expected to be a 9 on the rabblerousing scale of 1-10:-)



BTW, 2 big issues. Debt per taxpayer is now $163,000, which is how much YOU owe. YOU. If you cannot pay that bill, then your kids will have to do it. Maybe they'll thank you for that. NOT!

Next- update on Senator Wydens bill noted above, the "secure Data Act" I note above all but got sh#t on (by being ignored) and tossed into the trash.

Introduced: Jan 8, 2015
Status: Referred to Committee on Jan 8, 2015
This bill was assigned to a congressional committee on January 8, 2015, which will consider it before possibly sending it on to the House or Senate as a whole.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Sep 7, 2016 - 11:34pm PT
Not giving anyone a 'pass', the difference is who they are willing to target. Obama wouldn't target Snowden; W's crew would have in my opinion.

Conversely, Bush never went after Bin Laden, son of a guy the Bush family was partners with in the Carlisle Group.

And the Bin Ladens were the only flight permitted to leave the country when the Towers fell.


No Senate investigation.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Sep 7, 2016 - 11:40pm PT
NEVER went after Bin Laden? Proof? Yet another stupid statement by lorenza's oil.

Did they get him?

Again. No senate investigation of ties to Bin Laden family


But we did get. BENGHAZI!!!!!
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Sep 7, 2016 - 11:45pm PT
No, but I can translate English to retard for ya.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/george-w-bush-and-the-bin-laden-family-meet-in-new-york-city-one-day-before-911/5332870
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Sep 8, 2016 - 12:23am PT
[quote]http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bin-laden-family-evacuated/[/quote]

Common sense says that if the entire nation is on lockdown and no flights get out but bin Laden's brother's plane and he's partners with Bush, the senate might want to ask why.

They asked about BENGHAZI!!!!

Here's another Carlisle group partner, since you mentioned him.


kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Sep 8, 2016 - 12:23am PT
Interesting story about Ed Snowden's escape from Hong Kong:

http://news.nationalpost.com/features/how-edward-snowden-escaped-hong-kong

kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Sep 8, 2016 - 12:49am PT
https://www.instagram.com/lsjourney/

kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Sep 12, 2016 - 06:58pm PT
Information release from The Intercept of secret manuals on "Stingrays" (cell-site simulators), and how law enforcement spies on cell phones:

https://theintercept.com/2016/09/12/long-secret-stingray-manuals-detail-how-police-can-spy-on-phones/

couchmaster

climber
Sep 18, 2016 - 07:18am PT


Titled: Should Snowden Pardon President Obama? The upshot is that what the President is endorsing and allowing is illegal as hell, and he (and Bush) will never face charges for it. Interesting spin on the issue.

http://townhall.com/columnists/pauljacob/2016/09/18/should-snowden-pardon-president-obama-n2219876

Messages 1404 - 1423 of total 1468 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta