Chomsky says 9/11 truthers are nutters

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 141 - 160 of total 269 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 08:25pm PT
What's funny is that this thread wouldn't be here if Apogee did not start it. There's no way I would start a 911 thread on my own because of what people like you are like. You are not somebody I would have a conversation with.
crankster

Trad climber
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 08:29pm PT
Hey, it's a free country. You idiots can believe whatever ludicrous nutjobbery you want.
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 08:29pm PT
Oh, well thank you!
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2013 - 08:53pm PT
"There happen to be a lot of people around who spend an hour on the Internet and think they know a lot about physics, but it doesn’t work like that."
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2013 - 08:55pm PT
"What's funny is that this thread wouldn't be here if Apogee did not start it. "


Dude....seriously?

This kinda ST whacknut truther BS is almost as common as 'Dogs at the Crags'....
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:14pm PT
Sorry, Dr. F., I don't see myself as the guy in charge of your education. To me though, it's not about who or why but just that is was done......that the buildings were blown up with explosives, taken down in controlled demolition manner that is. The towers are unusual though, in that that they were demolished from the top down - not the usual demolition technique! It's so obvious Bldg 7 was a very controlled demolition that it goes without saying. What I wonder Dr. F. is why you can't see that. It's obvious. The lay person just does not want to realize or believe it for obvious reasons. For many people, all of this will be in suspension for many years until the atmosphere surrounding it changes.

Dr.F. says;
I love these temporary fast running loon threads

As a LIHOPer Dr. F. you are about as loony. Not seeing yourself as the loon you claim others to be may explain why you don't see Bldg 7's demise as a demolition.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:17pm PT
"There happen to be a lot of people around who spend an hour on the Internet and think they know a lot about physics, but it doesn’t work like that."

This describes rSin, jammer and McHale's Navy to a tee--not that they are capable of recognizing it.

Curt
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:21pm PT
Nutters....indeed they are but you don't need a Chomsky to figure that out.
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:23pm PT
What do you believe Curt? Are you a LIHOPer like Dr.F.? You've put down many posts like crankster and haven't said a f*#king thing. Is that your MO in life - to never say a f*#king thing?
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:28pm PT
What do you believe Curt. You've put down many posts like crankster and haven't said a f*#king thing. Is that your MO in life - to never say a f*#king thing?

I've posted several times (including in this thread) that I believe the NIST report to be correct. In a rush to post your next fantastic piece of nonsensical drivel, you obviously didn't bother to read that. I asked rSin a couple of pages back exactly what his background in physics is. Naturally, he didn't reply. What's yours, by the way?

Curt
WBraun

climber
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:34pm PT
I believe the NIST report to be correct.

Where have been?

The guys on that NIST panel are saying themselves it was a shame .....
McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:35pm PT
none of the questions we can pose will be answered, just like so many other conspiracy theories

The way Bldg 7 goes down it does not need anybody's question or an answer. It's there in plain site for all to see. It's like the king with no clothes - either you see it or you don't.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:37pm PT
Where have been?

The guys on that NIST panel are saying themselves it was a shame .....

Werner,

If you have a citation for that, I'd like to see it. Thanks.

Curt
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:40pm PT
Research man research

I am not going to do any work for you disrespectful aszholes at all!

Yeah, I didn't think it existed. Just keep making sh#t up, though. That's how conspiracies work.

Curt
WBraun

climber
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:43pm PT
It really shows you can't do it except run your mouths.

You guys are pathetic waste of humanity ....
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 09:45pm PT
It really shows you can't do it except run your mouths.

You guys are pathetic waste of humanity ....

Says the guy who's pulling BS straight out of his ass.

Curt
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Dec 2, 2013 - 10:03pm PT
But you proved the point that you're just an internet aszhole like the rest of sh!theads like Crankfuk etc.

I'm an aszhole because I require actual evidence to believe in something? That's an interesting take, Werner.

Curt

McHale's Navy

Trad climber
From Panorama City, CA
Dec 3, 2013 - 01:32pm PT
Your (someone I was debating in a civil manner) argument starts and ends with "Controlled demolition"

If you can't fill in the why and how, then it has little merit against Occam's Razor,
the hijackers took down all the buildings with their planes alone. Period.

Occam's Razor might say to look at the most obvious; Skyscrapers don't collapse at freefall speed no matter what happens to them ( well, unless they have continual explosive incentive ). 3 of them fell at freefall speed that day. The small thing known as resistance is what structure is all about. If there is any 911 subject that is irrefutable it is this. Knowing this, we do not have to know who did it, why, or how they did it for it to be so.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Dec 3, 2013 - 01:34pm PT
The towers didn't collapse at freefall speeds.
WBraun

climber
Dec 3, 2013 - 01:39pm PT
NIST admitted that their report on WTC-7 is not consistent with basic principles of physics.

Those who still fall for the NIST explanation for WTC 7’s collapse are the ones who abandoned science and gave in to fantasy on the subject of 9/11.
Messages 141 - 160 of total 269 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta