Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
Rajmit: "hopefully some others will chime in with their opinions"
Pretty soon Karl will give us that same "answer my question" post for the tenth time, word for word just like the other nine.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
I don't even know if Karl will be able to make this far down in this hell we are at now, he's on dial up, it'll be a long elevator ride down for him.
Start a continuation thread: Part 2 for him
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
Ramjet, if that is really you, you are about as ugly as Shack.
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
New York, NY
|
|
...at least until Lois responds....
|
|
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
Damn, just when it was starting to get good.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Hi Ya'll
Funny that Chaz can mention a question that I've asked 5 times but not manage to type even a one sentence answer. PoopnGhost didn't answer it directly either but I appreciate his post very much.
Personally, I'm not putting much sway into how the towers went down and if that indicates some conspiracy. Not enough evidence either way and could just be distracting disinformation.
I do want to know questions like
Why former ISI director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad ordered Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh to wire Mohammed Atta $100,000 and why this same Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad was at a breakfast meeting on Capitol Hill hosted by Senator Bob Graham and Rep. Porter Goss, the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence committees on the morning of 9-11? He met with CIA director George Tenet a few days earlier. WHY IS HE WIRING MOHAMMED ATTA $100,000? Isn't that a question worth looking into for God's sake?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/qfisi.html
I'm not saying anybody did anything. I don't like wearing a tin foil hat. I'm saying there are serious unanswered questions like the one above and that it's sheeplike not to inquire about them.
Peace
Karl
I'll also post this on the new thread created at
http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.html?topic_id=136635&f=0&b=0
|
|
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
Karl, Has it ever occured to you the question might just be too far "out there" to justify an answer?
But here's your answer, from my perspective:
How do the Hell do I know?
It's a hypothetical question, based on something that never happened, reported (or made up) by someone,who for all I know, has about as much credibility as Ann Coulter, Jason Blair, Mary Mapes, Michael Savage, or Michael Moore.
I spent the entire Kennedy Administration learning how to eat solid food and Basic Potty Training 101.
Kind of reminds me of the old "If GrandMa had two wheels and a hand-brake, would she be a Bike?"
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
The new thread is exceedingly lame, so I'm still posting here.
Chaz. I don't think the the question is out there. You refuse to do any research nor have you examine the scanned documents, and you won't answer it hypothetically.
I will give you a half point for actually talking about it in some form.
I'm telling you a reality. Folks actually blank out when something beyond their conception is placed in front of them. I've seen it plenty of times. There is research to support it. There are plenty of folks here that can't bear to even examine the questions.
You can argue about how those towers fell all day long. That can be refuted. Nobody wants to talk about why the chief Pakistani Spy guy wired Mohammed Atta $100,000 before 9-11 and then met with the present and future CIA directors on and immediately before 9-11.
Same Islamic country that we allowed to develop Nuclear weapons and who spread the technology around the Islamic world with total impunity.
Peace
karl
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
"The new thread is exceedingly lame, so I'm still posting here."
I'll take the blame for that, Karl.
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
Ramjet, is that a formal request for thread deletion? Do you consider it a mercy killing?
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
Don't answer a question with a question. That smacks of indecision.
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
You get the votes and it dies.
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
I'm having trouble with my voting. I think you should wait on Werner. What about Happie, Karl, Lois and the others? Don't they get a say in this?
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
New York, NY
|
|
Oh come on. The thread is getting back onto topic. Have patience.
Oh! And interesting that you didn't include Karl in the vote. he's been one of the key debaters in the thread.
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
Happie, I think Ramjet is indicating bias toward Karl. Trying to disenfranchise him.
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
I'm tempted to say Nuke that thread.
Better even, would be to make a new thread, 9-11 Continued and just agree to let that second thread fade or continue to debate Howard Stern. We could adjust the links from this thread and just stay on topic in the third thread.
Peace
karl
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
Well, somebody else better do it. I messed that one up.
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
New York, NY
|
|
That's an idea; it does seem, now that I look again, that Lois is firmly entrenched in avoiding the thread topic in favor of her beloved radio. - Ouch!, Can you rename that other thread? You could call it "The Serius Debate" or something.....
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!