Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Geochem labs all over the US are probably going ballistic now.

Plate tectonics began in Neoproterozoic time, and plumes from deep mantle have never operated

The widely accepted concepts that plate tectonics has operated throughout all or most of geologic time and that plumes from deep mantle have delivered heat and material to the crust are contradicted by powerful multidisciplinary evidence, some of which is summarized here. Pre-Neoproterozoic rocks, individually and as associations, and their geologic and crustal structures, are very different from modern ones, and include none of the definitive indicators of plate interactions that are abundant in the Phanerozoic record. The assumption that plumes rise from deep mantle is derived from false 1950s assumptions that Earth has evolved slowly from a cold start, and survives as dogma despite disproof of its early basis and of its subsequent generalizations and predictions. The history of science contains many gaps between consensus and truth, but most mainline literature presumes that consensus favoring ancient plates and plumes obviates the need for evaluation of assumptions, evidence, and alternatives.

Anthony Watts again does a Chiefy and draws a line between the first and last data points, then claims no warming.

I actually expected a little better even for that site but I see that I was wrong.
The really sad thing is that really few of his readers are going to see the problem with that graph.

comparison line for two points in time, and
thus accurate as presented."It is all there in the story.

Well finally a bit of undisputed truth comes forth from Larry regarding plate techtonics: " few contrary papers get through". Larry can you acknowledge the same treatment from the climate cabal of contrary papers?