Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 13741 - 13760 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 3, 2014 - 10:41pm PT
Hey Mal,

Are you bipolar?

Have you missed your meds?

If not, what's with the boatload of links, C&Ps and colorful, informative graphics? What's your point?


Sketch, what's your point?
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Sep 3, 2014 - 10:41pm PT
CA Cap and Trade: It looks like much of the money will be wasted, esp on the High Speed Train. They is not a requirement of climate change policy, but in California it is standard procedure to set up massive new bureaucracies who siphon up the funding.
Other states: I suggest you don't follow our lead. Use a simple carbon tax, which in the long run we can push into WTO policy.

The reason we have this wasteful system is because it's too hard to sell a simple tax, because voters are idiots. So we never even took a vote on a simple tax. Rather than all these new programs, why not just dump the money in one line item into general education, or paying off debt?

see the summary chart on page 6 of

http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/budget/cap-and-trade/auction-revenue-expenditure-022414.pdf
Some of these things are good, just CA will waste half of it on admin.
Biggest item is High Speed Train, initial section to Nowhere, $31 billion.

Intro:
Several economists who have evaluated
California’s cap-and-trade program have estimated
that, over the life of the program, average allowance
price may be in the $15 to $20 range. If this were
to occur, total revenue for the program through
2020 could be roughly $15 billion. To the extent
that ARB does not increase the percentage of free
allowances, the above revenue estimates would be
higher.

Then it goes on to warn of lawsuits.
The biggest may be continuing lawsuits against the high speed train. It was voted in ONLY if it had a viable plan to need no subsidies. It has no such plan.

Here is a good example of how Cali will spend the money:
http://keepcaliforniaspromise.org/469/soon-every-faculty-member-will-have-a-personal-senior-manager

BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Sep 4, 2014 - 12:08am PT
Splat, Ur's are good post's inwhich i'll sleep on.
Cragar

climber
MSLA - MT
Sep 4, 2014 - 07:02am PT
But know its the messenger and not the science, that turns people off.

True and sad for a society that is supposed to be 'smart'. Have we not learned to dig into the message as opposed to the messenger? Nope, lack of humility and giant egos feed into it. Also, after perusing this thread, it appears that most can't understand the science.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 07:38am PT
But know its the messenger and not the science, that turns people off.


I don't agree with this statement; it's the message itself that turns people off.

An Inconvenient Truth was a very well-made movie. The "messenger", which is the movie and not Al Gore, was easy to watch and the points were well made. But people don't like the message it brings, so they ridicule the messenger. And they ridicule the host of the movie. Anything to discredit the message.


Simply, people don't want to hear that they have to change the way of life they are used to living. Instead, they will cry fowl, stomp their feet, and generally deny what is right in front of them. We see it in every page of this topic, and that can be extended to the general population at large.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 07:43am PT
Please do state where "the science" has been installed as all knowing entity and should now never be questioned.

Nobody said that science is "all knowing." That's a silly remark and you can't make that statement in earnest without looking a bit silly yourself.

But people do trust science, and they trust their lives to it every day.

Western medicine. People trust the science behind it.
Viagra--men trust their cocks to the science behind the pill.

You yourself trust that your computer is going to correctly post your message to this forum topic. Do you ever question the keystrokes you make, wondering if they will find the right destination.

I doubt it, because you trust the science.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 07:53am PT
The Chief. So quick to jump in with the hate.



[People] will cry fowl, stomp their feet, and generally deny what is right in front of them.

Thank you for proving my point, The Chief.
WBraun

climber
Sep 4, 2014 - 07:58am PT
K-man -- "Simply, people don't want to hear that they have to change the way of life they are used to living.
Instead, they will cry fowl, stomp their feet, and generally deny what is right in front of them,"

Yes this is it in a nutshell.

The American general public can not for the life of them assimilate scientific data as presented by
scientist themselves.

They need practical real world examples that the average person can see for themselves in real time in their own communities.

Not mounds and mounds of mathematical formulas and piles of graphs and data.

Education needs practical layman's examples that can be assimilated by them.

You scientists are like freaks to the average person.

The human touch is far superior when backed by your mounds of math and data ........
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 08:04am PT
A fool's paradise:





Anybody with a lack of critical thinking will gobble up this image. But I don't buy the message that the image is trying to convey--that the image in Gore's book is a snapshot of a day in history. That it is in fact a "photo" and not an illustration.

What is the context of Gore's illustration, The Chief? Is the book saying that this is what things might look like if we continue on our path, or does it really try to pass the illustration off as a day we have lived?

BTW, ever seen a picture of Katrina from space? Wow.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 08:14am PT
Sketch, why don't you just graph the large decline from the highest peak in 1998 to the following trough?

Why or why not would that be just as telling as the graph you posted?




And, haven't we been over this before? In detail??



You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know.
WBraun

climber
Sep 4, 2014 - 08:19am PT
Sketch

Nice job of spinning and twisting what I just said to fit your agenda.

Here's what I said;

"They need practical real world examples that the average person can see for themselves in real time in their own communities.

Not mounds and mounds of mathematical formulas and piles of graphs and data."

And what's the first thing you do, lol

Show a graph ......
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 4, 2014 - 08:25am PT
The science underpinning CAGW is a twisted crock of shet. The underlying agenda has used climate change as the vehicle of choice to achieve the desired end. Kelly's post upstream ( "this changes everything"-if memory serves me correctly) says it all, discontent with the world as is and desire for a unrealistic uptopian fantasy. The morons pushing it here are either invested with their careers or brain dead sheep. The possibility of imposition of their nightmarish agenda prompts vigorous opposition from any rational person.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 08:35am PT
Cherry picking?


Yes.



And we've been over this before. In detail.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 08:43am PT
Rick, I don't often read or reply to your posts, but this statement did catch my attention:

Kelly's post upstream ( "this changes everything"-if memory serves me correctly) says it all, discontent with the world as is and desire for a unrealistic uptopian fantasy.


First, I'm impressed that you viewed the link and saw what Naomi Klein had to say. Personally, I believe that the wholesale "belief" that capitalism is the best economic system we can muster is in err. It has not worked well for most people living on the planet, and it has not worked well for the planet itself. Every system appears to be in decline. Except, perhaps, the system that enriches the most wealthy on the planet.

We must move past the model to something that is sustaining.


Well, I suppose we don't really have to.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Sep 4, 2014 - 08:46am PT
BigFeet

Trad climber
Texas
Sep 4, 2014 - 08:46am PT
So much has been said here from different view points that I now believe this thread only has a goal of who gets the last word.

30,000 replies here we come.

:)
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 08:52am PT
Seriously, Al Gore's movie was well made???




Looks like The Chief has a beef with an awful lot of people who know movies:


An Inconvenient Truth (2006), Awards



But what do they know, when standing next to the incomparable The Chief.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Sep 4, 2014 - 09:00am PT
Hey Sketch, can you explain why for over 1000 data points your trend lines only get close to the data for about 50?

Doesn't sound like a very "hi fidelity" trend...

Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Sep 4, 2014 - 09:05am PT
my career is ending, The Chief and I have absolutely nothing vested professionally, monetary or otherwise, in climate science.

You are making your usual loud, vulgar noises again. As befits your type.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 4, 2014 - 09:15am PT
So much has been said here from different view points that I now believe this thread only has a goal of who gets the last word.


Actually, quite a few folks post here with the purpose of showing the latest climate science findings and other thoughts about the state of affairs. For example, I posted a link about a forward-thinking book that just came out, and one that addresses climate change and how our capitalistic model is one of the root causes.


The trouble is, the thread gets dragged into the gutter by people who are against these things. They scream loudly, and bring the discussion down to their level.

For example, we have climate scientists, and others, who can make an intelligent post on the latest discoveries. Then we have people, who couldn't understand a scientific paper if Mother Goose herself read it to them, critique their posts.

It's as if they are a skipping record, forever playing an out-of-tune chorus that you can't get out of your ear.

It's a crazy circle. But there's a lot of good information to discover here, if you can possibly clear out the noise.
Messages 13741 - 13760 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta